Exploring the outcome "days with bothersome pain" and its association with pain intensity, disability, and quality of life.

IF 1.5 Q4 CLINICAL NEUROLOGY
Scandinavian Journal of Pain Pub Date : 2024-03-06 eCollection Date: 2024-01-01 DOI:10.1515/sjpain-2023-0049
Anne Marie Gausel, Ingvild Dalen, Andreas Eklund, Andreas Hoff Norvik, Iben Axén
{"title":"Exploring the outcome \"days with bothersome pain\" and its association with pain intensity, disability, and quality of life.","authors":"Anne Marie Gausel, Ingvild Dalen, Andreas Eklund, Andreas Hoff Norvik, Iben Axén","doi":"10.1515/sjpain-2023-0049","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objectives: </strong>The aim of this study is to investigate the criterion validity, specifically the concurrent validity of the measure of days with bothersome pain, by investigating its association with measures of pain intensity, disability, and quality of life.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>We used two separate cohorts to study the concurrent validity of \"days with bothersome pain,\" by investigating its association with pain intensity, disability, and quality of life: (1) 321 patients with low back pain (LBP), using follow-up data at 1 year, and (2) 170 pregnant women with pelvic girdle pain (PGP), using data at 12 and 30 weeks of their pregnancy. In both studies, weekly text messages asked for the number of days with bothersome pain the previous week. Pearson's correlation, univariable, and multivariable linear regression were used to assess the association between days with bothersome pain per week and pain intensity, disability, and quality of life. Non-linear associations were explored.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Days with bothersome pain were moderately and inversely correlated with quality of life (<i>r</i> = -0.45, <i>p</i> < 0.001), and moderately correlated with pain intensity (<i>r</i> = 0.70, <i>p</i> < 0.001) and disability ( <i>r</i> = 0.51, <i>p</i> < 0.001), among patients with LBP, and to a lesser degree among pregnant women with PGP (corresponding values at 18 weeks of pregnancy for quality of life; <i>r</i> = -0.27, <i>p</i> = 0.005, for pain intensity <i>r</i> = 0.41, <i>p</i> < 0.001, and for disability <i>r</i> = 0.41, <i>p</i> < 0.001). Furthermore, it was best explained by pain intensity for LBP patients, and by pain intensity and disability for pregnant women with pelvic pain. For the latter cohort, non-linear analyses suggested that days with bothersome pain could not distinguish between individuals with different high pain intensities and disabilities and low quality of life.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>We consider the concurrent validity of \"days with bothersome pain\" to be moderate in the correlations with pain intensity, disability, and quality of life in patients with LBP and in pregnant women with PGP. Ceiling effects may be an issue in populations with high pain severity. The differences between the cohorts suggested that also other constructs are involved in the concept of days with bothersome pain.</p>","PeriodicalId":47407,"journal":{"name":"Scandinavian Journal of Pain","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":1.5000,"publicationDate":"2024-03-06","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Scandinavian Journal of Pain","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1515/sjpain-2023-0049","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2024/1/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"CLINICAL NEUROLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Objectives: The aim of this study is to investigate the criterion validity, specifically the concurrent validity of the measure of days with bothersome pain, by investigating its association with measures of pain intensity, disability, and quality of life.

Methods: We used two separate cohorts to study the concurrent validity of "days with bothersome pain," by investigating its association with pain intensity, disability, and quality of life: (1) 321 patients with low back pain (LBP), using follow-up data at 1 year, and (2) 170 pregnant women with pelvic girdle pain (PGP), using data at 12 and 30 weeks of their pregnancy. In both studies, weekly text messages asked for the number of days with bothersome pain the previous week. Pearson's correlation, univariable, and multivariable linear regression were used to assess the association between days with bothersome pain per week and pain intensity, disability, and quality of life. Non-linear associations were explored.

Results: Days with bothersome pain were moderately and inversely correlated with quality of life (r = -0.45, p < 0.001), and moderately correlated with pain intensity (r = 0.70, p < 0.001) and disability ( r = 0.51, p < 0.001), among patients with LBP, and to a lesser degree among pregnant women with PGP (corresponding values at 18 weeks of pregnancy for quality of life; r = -0.27, p = 0.005, for pain intensity r = 0.41, p < 0.001, and for disability r = 0.41, p < 0.001). Furthermore, it was best explained by pain intensity for LBP patients, and by pain intensity and disability for pregnant women with pelvic pain. For the latter cohort, non-linear analyses suggested that days with bothersome pain could not distinguish between individuals with different high pain intensities and disabilities and low quality of life.

Conclusions: We consider the concurrent validity of "days with bothersome pain" to be moderate in the correlations with pain intensity, disability, and quality of life in patients with LBP and in pregnant women with PGP. Ceiling effects may be an issue in populations with high pain severity. The differences between the cohorts suggested that also other constructs are involved in the concept of days with bothersome pain.

探索 "疼痛困扰天数 "这一结果及其与疼痛强度、残疾和生活质量的关联。
研究目的本研究的目的是通过调查 "令人烦恼的疼痛天数 "与疼痛强度、残疾程度和生活质量的相关性,研究其标准效度,特别是并发效度:我们使用两个不同的队列来研究 "令人烦恼的疼痛天数 "的并发有效性,调查其与疼痛强度、残疾和生活质量的关联:(1)321 名腰背痛(LBP)患者,使用 1 年的随访数据;(2)170 名骨盆腰痛(PGP)孕妇,使用怀孕 12 周和 30 周的数据。在这两项研究中,每周的短信都会询问前一周出现疼痛的天数。采用皮尔逊相关性、单变量和多变量线性回归来评估每周疼痛天数与疼痛强度、残疾和生活质量之间的关系。研究还探讨了非线性关联:结果:在腰椎间盘突出症患者中,困扰性疼痛天数与生活质量呈中度反相关(r = -0.45,p < 0.001),与疼痛强度(r = 0.70,p < 0.001)和残疾(r = 0.51,p < 0.001),在患有肺结核的患者中,与生活质量的相关性较低,在患有肺结核的孕妇中,与生活质量的相关性较低(在怀孕 18 周时,生活质量的相应值为 r = -0.27,p = 0.005;疼痛强度的相关性为 r = 0.41,p < 0.001;残疾程度的相关性为 r = 0.41,p < 0.001)。此外,对腰椎间盘突出症患者来说,疼痛强度能最好地解释疼痛强度,而对患有骨盆疼痛的孕妇来说,疼痛强度和残疾程度能最好地解释疼痛强度。对于后者,非线性分析表明,"令人烦恼的疼痛天数 "并不能区分不同的高疼痛强度、残疾和低生活质量的个体:我们认为,"令人烦恼的疼痛天数 "与腰椎间盘突出症患者和患有前列腺增生症的孕妇的疼痛强度、残疾程度和生活质量之间的相关性具有中等程度的并发有效性。在疼痛严重程度较高的人群中,上限效应可能是一个问题。不同组群之间的差异表明,"令人烦恼的疼痛天数 "这一概念还涉及到其他结构。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Scandinavian Journal of Pain
Scandinavian Journal of Pain CLINICAL NEUROLOGY-
CiteScore
3.30
自引率
6.20%
发文量
73
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信