Intrapleural Fibrinolysis with Urokinase versus Alteplase in Complicated Pleural Effusions and Empyema: A Prospective Randomized Controlled Trial.

IF 2.5 Q2 RESPIRATORY SYSTEM
Tuberculosis and Respiratory Diseases Pub Date : 2024-07-01 Epub Date: 2024-03-07 DOI:10.4046/trd.2022.0168
Sudipt Adhikari, Vikas Marwah, Robin Choudhary, Indermani Pandey, Tentu Ajai Kumar, Virender Malik, Arpita Pemmaraju, Shrinath Vasudevan, Suraj Kapoor
{"title":"Intrapleural Fibrinolysis with Urokinase versus Alteplase in Complicated Pleural Effusions and Empyema: A Prospective Randomized Controlled Trial.","authors":"Sudipt Adhikari, Vikas Marwah, Robin Choudhary, Indermani Pandey, Tentu Ajai Kumar, Virender Malik, Arpita Pemmaraju, Shrinath Vasudevan, Suraj Kapoor","doi":"10.4046/trd.2022.0168","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Intrapleural fibrinolytic therapy (IPFT) has been used as an effective agent since 1949 for managing complicated pleural effusion and empyema. Several agents, such as streptokinase, urokinase (UK), and recombinant tissue plasminogen activator (rt-PA), have been found to be effective with variable effectiveness. However, a head-tohead controlled trial comparing the efficacy of the most frequently used agents, i.e., UK and rt-PA (alteplase) for managing complicated pleural effusion has rarely been reported.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>A total of 50 patients were randomized in two intervention groups, i.e., UK and rt-PA. The dose of rt-PA was 10 mg, and that of UK was 1.0 lac units. UK was given thrice daily for 2 days, followed by clamping to allow the retainment of drugs in the pleural space for 2 hours. rt-PA was instilled into the pleural space twice daily for 2 days, and intercostal drainage was clamped for 1 hour.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>A total of 50 patients were enrolled into the study, of which 84% (n=42) were males and 16% (n=8) were females. Among them, 30 (60%) patients received UK, and 20 (40%) patients received alteplase as IPFT agents. The percentage of mean± standard deviation changes in pleural opacity was -33.0%±9.9% in the UK group and -41.0%±14.9% in the alteplase group, respectively (p=0.014). Pain was the most common adverse side effect, occurring in 60% (n=18) of the patients in the UK group and in 40% (n=8) of the patients in the alteplase group (p=0.24), while fever was the second most common side effect. Patients who reported early (within 6 weeks of onset of symptoms) showed a greater response than those who reported late for the intervention.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>IPFT is a safe and effective option for managing complicated pleural effusion or empyema, and newer agents, such as alteplase, have greater efficacy and a similar adverse effect profile when compared with conventional agents, such as UK.</p>","PeriodicalId":23368,"journal":{"name":"Tuberculosis and Respiratory Diseases","volume":" ","pages":"378-385"},"PeriodicalIF":2.5000,"publicationDate":"2024-07-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11222100/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Tuberculosis and Respiratory Diseases","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.4046/trd.2022.0168","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2024/3/7 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"RESPIRATORY SYSTEM","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: Intrapleural fibrinolytic therapy (IPFT) has been used as an effective agent since 1949 for managing complicated pleural effusion and empyema. Several agents, such as streptokinase, urokinase (UK), and recombinant tissue plasminogen activator (rt-PA), have been found to be effective with variable effectiveness. However, a head-tohead controlled trial comparing the efficacy of the most frequently used agents, i.e., UK and rt-PA (alteplase) for managing complicated pleural effusion has rarely been reported.

Methods: A total of 50 patients were randomized in two intervention groups, i.e., UK and rt-PA. The dose of rt-PA was 10 mg, and that of UK was 1.0 lac units. UK was given thrice daily for 2 days, followed by clamping to allow the retainment of drugs in the pleural space for 2 hours. rt-PA was instilled into the pleural space twice daily for 2 days, and intercostal drainage was clamped for 1 hour.

Results: A total of 50 patients were enrolled into the study, of which 84% (n=42) were males and 16% (n=8) were females. Among them, 30 (60%) patients received UK, and 20 (40%) patients received alteplase as IPFT agents. The percentage of mean± standard deviation changes in pleural opacity was -33.0%±9.9% in the UK group and -41.0%±14.9% in the alteplase group, respectively (p=0.014). Pain was the most common adverse side effect, occurring in 60% (n=18) of the patients in the UK group and in 40% (n=8) of the patients in the alteplase group (p=0.24), while fever was the second most common side effect. Patients who reported early (within 6 weeks of onset of symptoms) showed a greater response than those who reported late for the intervention.

Conclusion: IPFT is a safe and effective option for managing complicated pleural effusion or empyema, and newer agents, such as alteplase, have greater efficacy and a similar adverse effect profile when compared with conventional agents, such as UK.

用尿激酶与阿替普酶进行胸膜腔内纤维蛋白溶解治疗复杂性胸腔积液和肺水肿:一项前瞻性随机对照试验。
导言:自 1949 年以来,胸膜腔内纤维蛋白溶解疗法一直是治疗复杂性胸腔积液和肺水肿的有效药物。链激酶(STK)、尿激酶(UK)和重组组织纤溶酶原激活剂(rt-PA)等几种药物的疗效各不相同。然而,比较最常用的尿激酶和重组组织纤溶酶原激活剂(阿替普酶)治疗复杂性胸腔积液疗效的头对头对照试验却鲜有报道。rt-PA 的剂量为 10 毫克,UK 的剂量为 1.0 拉克单位。英国每天三次,连续两天,然后夹闭胸膜,让药物在胸膜腔内保留 2 小时;rt-PA 每天两次,连续两天灌入胸膜腔,夹闭肋间引流 1 小时:共有 50 名患者参与研究,其中男性占 84%(42 人),女性占 16%(8 人)。其中,30 名患者(60%)接受了英国治疗,20 名患者(40%)接受了阿替普酶治疗。英国组胸膜翳的平均变化率为-33.0%(SD +/-9.9),阿替普酶组为-41.0%(SD +/-14.9)(P-值-0.014)。疼痛是最常见的不良副作用,英国组有60%(18人)的患者出现疼痛,阿替普酶组有40%(8人)的患者出现疼痛(P值0.24),发热是第二常见的副作用。早期(发病后 6 周内)报告的患者比晚期报告的患者反应更大:IPFT是治疗复杂性胸腔积液或肺水肿的一种安全有效的方法,与UK等传统药物相比,阿替普酶等新型药物疗效更好,不良反应也相似。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
5.30
自引率
0.00%
发文量
42
审稿时长
12 weeks
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信