YouTube as a source of information about rubber dam: quality and content analysis.

Restorative Dentistry & Endodontics Pub Date : 2024-02-05 eCollection Date: 2024-02-01 DOI:10.5395/rde.2024.49.e10
Gülsen Kiraz, Arzu Kaya Mumcu, Safa Kurnaz
{"title":"YouTube as a source of information about rubber dam: quality and content analysis.","authors":"Gülsen Kiraz, Arzu Kaya Mumcu, Safa Kurnaz","doi":"10.5395/rde.2024.49.e10","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objectives: </strong>This study aimed to evaluate the content, quality and demographics of YouTube videos about rubber dam as an information source for clinicians and dental students.</p><p><strong>Materials and methods: </strong>\"Rubber dam,\" \"rubber dam application,\" \"dental isolation,\" \"rubber dam isolation,\" and \"dental dam\" were determined as keywords for the detection of YouTube videos related to rubber dam. Seventy 3 videos were evaluated and a total of 34 videos met the inclusion criteria. All selected videos were evaluated according to 8 parameters. The videos were scored 1 if the videos contained information about the selected parameter, but if the videos did not contain enough information, they were scored 0. The data were statistically analyzed with the analysis of variance and <i>post hoc</i> Tukey test (<i>p</i> < 0.05).</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>We found that 41% of the videos have poor, 47% have moderate, and 12% have good information. There is a statistically significant difference in time between poor and good information content (<i>p</i> < 0.05). There is a statistically significant difference between the poor and good information in the video information and quality index 1.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Rubber dam-related videos available on YouTube are generally moderately informed and insufficient. YouTube is currently not sufficient as a source of information for patients and clinicians at the moment. The YouTube platform should be developed and enriched with quality information on current and dental issues.</p>","PeriodicalId":21102,"journal":{"name":"Restorative Dentistry & Endodontics","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-02-05","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10912544/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Restorative Dentistry & Endodontics","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.5395/rde.2024.49.e10","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2024/2/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Objectives: This study aimed to evaluate the content, quality and demographics of YouTube videos about rubber dam as an information source for clinicians and dental students.

Materials and methods: "Rubber dam," "rubber dam application," "dental isolation," "rubber dam isolation," and "dental dam" were determined as keywords for the detection of YouTube videos related to rubber dam. Seventy 3 videos were evaluated and a total of 34 videos met the inclusion criteria. All selected videos were evaluated according to 8 parameters. The videos were scored 1 if the videos contained information about the selected parameter, but if the videos did not contain enough information, they were scored 0. The data were statistically analyzed with the analysis of variance and post hoc Tukey test (p < 0.05).

Results: We found that 41% of the videos have poor, 47% have moderate, and 12% have good information. There is a statistically significant difference in time between poor and good information content (p < 0.05). There is a statistically significant difference between the poor and good information in the video information and quality index 1.

Conclusions: Rubber dam-related videos available on YouTube are generally moderately informed and insufficient. YouTube is currently not sufficient as a source of information for patients and clinicians at the moment. The YouTube platform should be developed and enriched with quality information on current and dental issues.

作为橡胶坝信息来源的 YouTube:质量和内容分析。
研究目的本研究旨在评估作为临床医生和牙科学生信息来源的YouTube上有关橡胶坝的视频的内容、质量和人口统计学特征:将 "橡胶坝"、"橡胶坝应用"、"牙科隔离"、"橡胶坝隔离 "和 "牙科水坝 "确定为检测 YouTube 上与橡胶坝相关视频的关键词。共评估了 703 个视频,其中 34 个视频符合纳入标准。所有入选视频均根据 8 项参数进行评估。如果视频包含所选参数的相关信息,则打 1 分;如果视频没有包含足够的信息,则打 0 分。数据采用方差分析和事后 Tukey 检验(P < 0.05)进行统计分析:我们发现,41% 的视频信息量较少,47% 的视频信息量中等,12% 的视频信息量较多。信息内容差和信息内容好在时间上有显著的统计学差异(P < 0.05)。在视频信息和质量指数 1.结论中,信息差和信息好的差异有统计学意义:YouTube 上与橡胶坝相关的视频信息量一般,信息不足。目前,YouTube 还不足以成为患者和临床医生的信息来源。应开发 YouTube 平台并丰富其内容,提供有关当前和牙科问题的优质信息。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
0.20
自引率
0.00%
发文量
35
审稿时长
12 weeks
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信