The status of clinical trials regarding root canal sealers.

Restorative Dentistry & Endodontics Pub Date : 2024-01-15 eCollection Date: 2024-02-01 DOI:10.5395/rde.2024.49.e5
Ahmad Al Malak, Yasmina El Masri, Mira Al Ziab, Nancy Zrara, Tarek Baroud, Pascale Salameh
{"title":"The status of clinical trials regarding root canal sealers.","authors":"Ahmad Al Malak, Yasmina El Masri, Mira Al Ziab, Nancy Zrara, Tarek Baroud, Pascale Salameh","doi":"10.5395/rde.2024.49.e5","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objectives: </strong>This study aimed to present the results and analyses of clinical trials, including updates on the different functions of root canal sealers.</p><p><strong>Materials and methods: </strong>In June 2023, we performed a comprehensive search of ClinicalTrials.gov to identify interventional clinical trials pertaining to root canal sealers. In total, 23 clinical trials conducted up to June 2023 were included in this study.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Approximately half of the trials (11 out of 23) were completed, while none were terminated or withdrawn. Each included trial had a minimum of 10 participants, with 11 trials having more than 100 participants. None of the assessed trials provided outcomes, and the majority (17 out of 23) lacked associated publications. In terms of geographic distribution, the USA and Canada did not contribute to any root canal sealer trials.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>This study highlights the lack of diversity in trial locations, the absence of reported results, and a scarcity of clinical trials examining the physicochemical properties of different sealers. Most published trials primarily focused on assessing the post-operative pain effect of these sealers, but no significant difference was found regarding post-operative pain control.</p>","PeriodicalId":21102,"journal":{"name":"Restorative Dentistry & Endodontics","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-01-15","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10912543/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Restorative Dentistry & Endodontics","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.5395/rde.2024.49.e5","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2024/2/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Objectives: This study aimed to present the results and analyses of clinical trials, including updates on the different functions of root canal sealers.

Materials and methods: In June 2023, we performed a comprehensive search of ClinicalTrials.gov to identify interventional clinical trials pertaining to root canal sealers. In total, 23 clinical trials conducted up to June 2023 were included in this study.

Results: Approximately half of the trials (11 out of 23) were completed, while none were terminated or withdrawn. Each included trial had a minimum of 10 participants, with 11 trials having more than 100 participants. None of the assessed trials provided outcomes, and the majority (17 out of 23) lacked associated publications. In terms of geographic distribution, the USA and Canada did not contribute to any root canal sealer trials.

Conclusions: This study highlights the lack of diversity in trial locations, the absence of reported results, and a scarcity of clinical trials examining the physicochemical properties of different sealers. Most published trials primarily focused on assessing the post-operative pain effect of these sealers, but no significant difference was found regarding post-operative pain control.

根管封闭剂的临床试验现状。
研究目的本研究旨在介绍临床试验的结果和分析,包括根管封闭剂不同功能的最新情况:2023 年 6 月,我们对 ClinicalTrials.gov 进行了全面搜索,以确定与根管封闭剂有关的介入性临床试验。本研究共纳入了截至 2023 年 6 月进行的 23 项临床试验:大约一半的试验(23 项中的 11 项)已经完成,没有一项试验被终止或撤销。每项纳入的试验至少有 10 名参与者,其中 11 项试验的参与者超过 100 人。所评估的试验均未提供结果,大多数试验(23 项中的 17 项)未发表相关论文。从地理分布来看,美国和加拿大没有参与任何根管封闭剂试验:本研究强调了试验地点缺乏多样性、缺乏报告结果以及缺乏检查不同封闭剂理化特性的临床试验。大多数已发表的试验主要侧重于评估这些封闭剂的术后疼痛效果,但在术后疼痛控制方面没有发现明显的差异。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
0.20
自引率
0.00%
发文量
35
审稿时长
12 weeks
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信