Color discrepancy of single-shade composites at different distances from the interface measured using cell phone images.

Restorative Dentistry & Endodontics Pub Date : 2024-01-24 eCollection Date: 2024-02-01 DOI:10.5395/rde.2024.49.e7
Márcia Luciana Carregosa Santana, Gabriella de Jesus Santos Livi, André Luis Faria-E-Silva
{"title":"Color discrepancy of single-shade composites at different distances from the interface measured using cell phone images.","authors":"Márcia Luciana Carregosa Santana, Gabriella de Jesus Santos Livi, André Luis Faria-E-Silva","doi":"10.5395/rde.2024.49.e7","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objectives: </strong>This study aimed to evaluate the impact of substrate color and interface distance on the color adjustment of 2 single-shade composites, Vittra APS Unique and Charisma Diamond One.</p><p><strong>Materials and methods: </strong>Dual disc-shaped specimens were created using Vittra APS Unique or Charisma Diamond One as the center composite, surrounded by shaded composites (A1 or A3). Color measurements were taken with a spectrophotometer against a gray background, recording the color coordinates in the CIELAB color space. Illumination with a light-correcting device and image acquisition using a polarizing filter-equipped cell phone were performed on specimens over the same background. Image processing software was used to measure the color coordinates in the center and periphery of the inner composite and in the outer composite. The color data were then converted to CIELAB coordinates and adjusted using data from the spectrophotometer. Color differences (ΔE<sub>00</sub>) between the center/periphery of single-shade and outer composites were calculated, along with color changes in single-shade composites caused by different outer composites. Color differences for the inner composites surrounded by A1 and A3 were also calculated. Data were analyzed using repeated-measures analysis of variance (α = 0.05).</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The results showed that color discrepancies were lowest near the interface and when the outer composite was whiter (A1). Additionally, Charisma Diamond One exhibited better color adjustment ability than Vittra APS Unique.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Color discrepancies between the investigated single-shade composites diminished towards the interface with the surrounding composite, particularly when the latter exhibited a lighter shade.</p>","PeriodicalId":21102,"journal":{"name":"Restorative Dentistry & Endodontics","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-01-24","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10912548/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Restorative Dentistry & Endodontics","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.5395/rde.2024.49.e7","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2024/2/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Objectives: This study aimed to evaluate the impact of substrate color and interface distance on the color adjustment of 2 single-shade composites, Vittra APS Unique and Charisma Diamond One.

Materials and methods: Dual disc-shaped specimens were created using Vittra APS Unique or Charisma Diamond One as the center composite, surrounded by shaded composites (A1 or A3). Color measurements were taken with a spectrophotometer against a gray background, recording the color coordinates in the CIELAB color space. Illumination with a light-correcting device and image acquisition using a polarizing filter-equipped cell phone were performed on specimens over the same background. Image processing software was used to measure the color coordinates in the center and periphery of the inner composite and in the outer composite. The color data were then converted to CIELAB coordinates and adjusted using data from the spectrophotometer. Color differences (ΔE00) between the center/periphery of single-shade and outer composites were calculated, along with color changes in single-shade composites caused by different outer composites. Color differences for the inner composites surrounded by A1 and A3 were also calculated. Data were analyzed using repeated-measures analysis of variance (α = 0.05).

Results: The results showed that color discrepancies were lowest near the interface and when the outer composite was whiter (A1). Additionally, Charisma Diamond One exhibited better color adjustment ability than Vittra APS Unique.

Conclusions: Color discrepancies between the investigated single-shade composites diminished towards the interface with the surrounding composite, particularly when the latter exhibited a lighter shade.

使用手机图像测量的离界面不同距离的单一色调复合材料的色差。
研究目的本研究旨在评估基材颜色和界面距离对两种单阴影复合材料(Vittra APS Unique 和 Charisma Diamond One)颜色调节的影响:以 Vittra APS Unique 或 Charisma Diamond One 为中心复合材料,周围环绕阴影复合材料(A1 或 A3),制作双圆盘状试样。在灰色背景下使用分光光度计测量颜色,并记录 CIELAB 色彩空间中的颜色坐标。在相同背景下,使用光校正装置对试样进行照明,并使用配备偏振滤光镜的手机进行图像采集。使用图像处理软件测量内层复合材料中心和外围以及外层复合材料的颜色坐标。然后将颜色数据转换为 CIELAB 坐标,并使用分光光度计的数据进行调整。计算单色复合材料和外层复合材料中心/外围的色差(ΔE00),以及不同外层复合材料引起的单色复合材料的颜色变化。还计算了 A1 和 A3 包围的内部复合材料的颜色差异。数据采用重复测量方差分析法(α = 0.05)进行分析:结果表明,界面附近和外层复合材料(A1)较白时,色差最小。此外,与 Vittra APS Unique 相比,Charisma Diamond One 的色彩调整能力更强:结论:所研究的单色调复合材料与周围复合材料的色差在界面附近减小,特别是当后者的色调较浅时。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
0.20
自引率
0.00%
发文量
35
审稿时长
12 weeks
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信