The role of remnant cholesterol in patients with ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction.

IF 8.4 2区 医学 Q1 CARDIAC & CARDIOVASCULAR SYSTEMS
Yan Zhou, Jasmine Melissa Madsen, Burcu Tas Özbek, Lars Køber, Lia Evi Bang, Jacob Thomsen Lønborg, Thomas Engstrøm
{"title":"The role of remnant cholesterol in patients with ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction.","authors":"Yan Zhou, Jasmine Melissa Madsen, Burcu Tas Özbek, Lars Køber, Lia Evi Bang, Jacob Thomsen Lønborg, Thomas Engstrøm","doi":"10.1093/eurjpc/zwae102","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Aims: </strong>Remnant cholesterol (RC) is the cholesterol content within triglyceride-rich lipoproteins. It promotes atherosclerotic cardiovascular disease beyond LDL cholesterol (LDL-C). The prognostic role of RC in patients with ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction (STEMI) is unknown. We aimed to estimate RC-related risk beyond LDL-C in patients with STEMI.</p><p><strong>Methods and results: </strong>A total of 6602 consecutive patients with STEMI treated with primary percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) from 1999 to 2016 were included. Remnant cholesterol was calculated as total cholesterol minus LDL-C minus HDL cholesterol. Adjusted Cox models were used to estimate the association between continuous RC levels and all-cause mortality, cardiovascular death, ischaemic stroke, and recurrent myocardial infarction (MI) at long-term (median follow-up of 6.0 years). Besides, discordance analyses were applied to examine the risk of the discordantly high RC (RC percentile rank minus LDL-C percentile rank > 10 units) compared with the discordantly low RC (LDL-C percentile rank minus RC percentile rank > 10 units). The concordance was defined as the percentile rank difference between RC and LDL-C ≤ 10 units. The median age of patients was 63 years [interquartile range (IQR) 54-72] and 74.8% were men. There were 2441, 1651, and 2510 patients in the discordantly low RC group, concordant group, and discordantly high RC group, respectively. All outcomes in the discordantly high RC group were higher than the other groups, and the event rate of all-cause mortality in this group was 31.87%. In the unadjusted analysis, the discordantly high RC was associated with increased all-cause mortality [hazard ratio (HR) 1.82, 95% confidence interval (CI) 1.63-2.04] and increased cardiovascular death (HR 1.79, 95% CI 1.55-2.06) compared with the discordantly low RC. In an adjusted model, RC was associated with higher all-cause mortality (HR 1.14, 95% CI 1.07-1.22). The discordantly high RC was associated with increased all-cause mortality (adjusted HR 1.55, 95% CI 1.37-1.75) and increased cardiovascular death (adjusted HR 1.47, 95% CI 1.25-1.72) compared with the discordantly low RC. There were no associations between RC and ischaemic stroke or recurrent MI.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>In patients with STEMI treated with primary PCI, elevated RC levels beyond LDL-C and discordantly high RC were independently associated with increased all-cause mortality.</p>","PeriodicalId":12051,"journal":{"name":"European journal of preventive cardiology","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":8.4000,"publicationDate":"2024-08-09","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"European journal of preventive cardiology","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1093/eurjpc/zwae102","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"CARDIAC & CARDIOVASCULAR SYSTEMS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Aims: Remnant cholesterol (RC) is the cholesterol content within triglyceride-rich lipoproteins. It promotes atherosclerotic cardiovascular disease beyond LDL cholesterol (LDL-C). The prognostic role of RC in patients with ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction (STEMI) is unknown. We aimed to estimate RC-related risk beyond LDL-C in patients with STEMI.

Methods and results: A total of 6602 consecutive patients with STEMI treated with primary percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) from 1999 to 2016 were included. Remnant cholesterol was calculated as total cholesterol minus LDL-C minus HDL cholesterol. Adjusted Cox models were used to estimate the association between continuous RC levels and all-cause mortality, cardiovascular death, ischaemic stroke, and recurrent myocardial infarction (MI) at long-term (median follow-up of 6.0 years). Besides, discordance analyses were applied to examine the risk of the discordantly high RC (RC percentile rank minus LDL-C percentile rank > 10 units) compared with the discordantly low RC (LDL-C percentile rank minus RC percentile rank > 10 units). The concordance was defined as the percentile rank difference between RC and LDL-C ≤ 10 units. The median age of patients was 63 years [interquartile range (IQR) 54-72] and 74.8% were men. There were 2441, 1651, and 2510 patients in the discordantly low RC group, concordant group, and discordantly high RC group, respectively. All outcomes in the discordantly high RC group were higher than the other groups, and the event rate of all-cause mortality in this group was 31.87%. In the unadjusted analysis, the discordantly high RC was associated with increased all-cause mortality [hazard ratio (HR) 1.82, 95% confidence interval (CI) 1.63-2.04] and increased cardiovascular death (HR 1.79, 95% CI 1.55-2.06) compared with the discordantly low RC. In an adjusted model, RC was associated with higher all-cause mortality (HR 1.14, 95% CI 1.07-1.22). The discordantly high RC was associated with increased all-cause mortality (adjusted HR 1.55, 95% CI 1.37-1.75) and increased cardiovascular death (adjusted HR 1.47, 95% CI 1.25-1.72) compared with the discordantly low RC. There were no associations between RC and ischaemic stroke or recurrent MI.

Conclusion: In patients with STEMI treated with primary PCI, elevated RC levels beyond LDL-C and discordantly high RC were independently associated with increased all-cause mortality.

残余胆固醇在 ST 段抬高型心肌梗死患者中的作用。
背景:残余胆固醇(RC)是富含甘油三酯的脂蛋白中的胆固醇含量。它对动脉粥样硬化性心血管疾病的促进作用超过了低密度脂蛋白胆固醇(LDL-C)。RC对ST段抬高型心肌梗死(STEMI)患者的预后作用尚不清楚。我们旨在估算 STEMI 患者 LDL-C 以外的 RC 相关风险:纳入了 1999 年至 2016 年期间接受初级经皮冠状动脉介入治疗(PCI)的 6602 例 STEMI 连续患者。RC的计算方法为总胆固醇减去低密度脂蛋白胆固醇再减去高密度脂蛋白胆固醇。使用调整后的 Cox 模型估计连续 RC 水平与长期(中位随访 6.0 年)全因死亡率、心血管死亡、缺血性卒中和复发性心肌梗死(MI)之间的关系。此外,还应用了不一致性分析来研究不一致性高RC(RC百分位数等级减去LDL-C百分位数等级> 10个单位)与不一致性低RC(LDL-C百分位数等级减去RC百分位数等级> 10个单位)的风险比较。一致性的定义是 RC 与 LDL-C 的百分位数差值小于 10 个单位。患者的中位年龄为 63 岁[四分位数间距 (IQR) 54-72],74.8% 为男性。不一致低 RC 组、一致组和不一致高 RC 组分别有 2441、1651 和 2510 名患者。不一致高 RC 组的所有结果均高于其他组,该组的全因死亡率为 31.87%。在未经调整的分析中,与不一致的低 RC 相比,不一致的高 RC 与更高的全因死亡率[危险比 (HR) 1.82,95% 置信区间 (CI) 1.63-2.04]和更高的心血管死亡(HR 1.79,95% CI 1.55-2.06)相关。在调整模型中,RC 与更高的全因死亡率相关(HR 1.14,95% CI 1.07-1.22)。与不一致的低 RC 相比,不一致的高 RC 与更高的全因死亡率(调整后 HR 1.55,95% CI 1.37-1.75)和更高的心血管死亡(调整后 HR 1.47,95% CI 1.25-1.72)相关。RC与缺血性卒中或复发性心肌梗死之间没有关联:结论:在接受初级PCI治疗的STEMI患者中,RC水平升高超过低密度脂蛋白胆固醇和不一致的高RC与全因死亡率升高密切相关。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
European journal of preventive cardiology
European journal of preventive cardiology CARDIAC & CARDIOVASCULAR SYSTEMS-
CiteScore
12.50
自引率
12.00%
发文量
601
审稿时长
3-8 weeks
期刊介绍: European Journal of Preventive Cardiology (EJPC) is an official journal of the European Society of Cardiology (ESC) and the European Association of Preventive Cardiology (EAPC). The journal covers a wide range of scientific, clinical, and public health disciplines related to cardiovascular disease prevention, risk factor management, cardiovascular rehabilitation, population science and public health, and exercise physiology. The categories covered by the journal include classical risk factors and treatment, lifestyle risk factors, non-modifiable cardiovascular risk factors, cardiovascular conditions, concomitant pathological conditions, sport cardiology, diagnostic tests, care settings, epidemiology, pharmacology and pharmacotherapy, machine learning, and artificial intelligence.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信