Does Size Matter? The Effect of Size of Distal Perfusion Catheter on Acute Limb Ischemia: A Meta-Analysis.

IF 3.1 3区 医学 Q2 ENGINEERING, BIOMEDICAL
ASAIO Journal Pub Date : 2024-10-01 Epub Date: 2024-03-06 DOI:10.1097/MAT.0000000000002178
Doug A Gouchoe, Sameer Chaurasia, Matthew C Henn, Bryan A Whitson, Nahush A Mokadam, David Mast, Sree Satyapriya, Ajay Vallakati, Asvin M Ganapathi
{"title":"Does Size Matter? The Effect of Size of Distal Perfusion Catheter on Acute Limb Ischemia: A Meta-Analysis.","authors":"Doug A Gouchoe, Sameer Chaurasia, Matthew C Henn, Bryan A Whitson, Nahush A Mokadam, David Mast, Sree Satyapriya, Ajay Vallakati, Asvin M Ganapathi","doi":"10.1097/MAT.0000000000002178","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Prevention of limb ischemia in patients with venoarterial extracorporeal membrane oxygenation (VA-ECMO) is primarily achieved through the use of distal perfusion catheters (DPC). Our objective was to assess the role of DPC, and specifically the size of the catheter, in reducing the incidence of acute limb ischemia (ALI) through a meta-analysis. Seventeen studies met criteria for analysis. Pooled analysis included a total of 2,040 patients, of which 904 patients received ECMO with DPC and 1,136 patients underwent ECMO without DPC. Compared with ECMO alone, ECMO with DPC, regardless of size, significantly decreased ALI (relative risk [RR]: 0.49, 95% confidence interval [CI]: 0.31-0.77; p = 0.002). When comparing reactive versus prophylactic placement of DPC, prophylactic DPC was associated with significantly decreased ALI (RR: 0.41, 95% CI: 0.24-0.71; p = 0.02). No differences in mortality (RR: 0.89, 95% CI: 0.76-1.03; p = 0.12) and bleeding events (RR: 1.43, 95% CI: 0.41-4.96; p = 0.58) were observed between the two groups. This analysis demonstrates that the placement of DPC, if done prophylactically and regardless of size, is associated with a reduced risk of ALI versus the absence of DPC placement, but is not associated with differences in mortality or bleeding events.</p>","PeriodicalId":8844,"journal":{"name":"ASAIO Journal","volume":" ","pages":"853-860"},"PeriodicalIF":3.1000,"publicationDate":"2024-10-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"ASAIO Journal","FirstCategoryId":"5","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1097/MAT.0000000000002178","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2024/3/6 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"ENGINEERING, BIOMEDICAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Prevention of limb ischemia in patients with venoarterial extracorporeal membrane oxygenation (VA-ECMO) is primarily achieved through the use of distal perfusion catheters (DPC). Our objective was to assess the role of DPC, and specifically the size of the catheter, in reducing the incidence of acute limb ischemia (ALI) through a meta-analysis. Seventeen studies met criteria for analysis. Pooled analysis included a total of 2,040 patients, of which 904 patients received ECMO with DPC and 1,136 patients underwent ECMO without DPC. Compared with ECMO alone, ECMO with DPC, regardless of size, significantly decreased ALI (relative risk [RR]: 0.49, 95% confidence interval [CI]: 0.31-0.77; p = 0.002). When comparing reactive versus prophylactic placement of DPC, prophylactic DPC was associated with significantly decreased ALI (RR: 0.41, 95% CI: 0.24-0.71; p = 0.02). No differences in mortality (RR: 0.89, 95% CI: 0.76-1.03; p = 0.12) and bleeding events (RR: 1.43, 95% CI: 0.41-4.96; p = 0.58) were observed between the two groups. This analysis demonstrates that the placement of DPC, if done prophylactically and regardless of size, is associated with a reduced risk of ALI versus the absence of DPC placement, but is not associated with differences in mortality or bleeding events.

尺寸重要吗?远端灌注导管的尺寸对急性肢体缺血的影响:元分析。
静脉动脉体外膜肺氧合(VA-ECMO)患者肢体缺血的预防主要通过使用远端灌注导管(DPC)来实现。我们的目标是通过荟萃分析评估 DPC(特别是导管的大小)在降低急性肢体缺血(ALI)发生率方面的作用。17项研究符合分析标准。汇总分析共纳入 2,040 名患者,其中 904 名患者接受了带 DPC 的 ECMO,1,136 名患者接受了不带 DPC 的 ECMO。与单纯的 ECMO 相比,无论规模大小,使用 DPC 的 ECMO 都能显著降低 ALI(相对风险 [RR]: 0.49,95% 置信区间):0.49,95% 置信区间 [CI]:0.31-0.77; p = 0.002).在比较反应性与预防性 DPC 置入时,预防性 DPC 与 ALI 的显著降低相关(RR:0.41,95% CI:0.24-0.71;P = 0.02)。两组患者的死亡率(RR:0.89,95% CI:0.76-1.03;P = 0.12)和出血事件(RR:1.43,95% CI:0.41-4.96;P = 0.58)无差异。这项分析表明,如果预防性地放置 DPC,无论其大小如何,与未放置 DPC 相比,ALI 风险降低,但与死亡率或出血事件的差异无关。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
ASAIO Journal
ASAIO Journal 医学-工程:生物医学
CiteScore
6.60
自引率
7.10%
发文量
651
审稿时长
4-8 weeks
期刊介绍: ASAIO Journal is in the forefront of artificial organ research and development. On the cutting edge of innovative technology, it features peer-reviewed articles of the highest quality that describe research, development, the most recent advances in the design of artificial organ devices and findings from initial testing. Bimonthly, the ASAIO Journal features state-of-the-art investigations, laboratory and clinical trials, and discussions and opinions from experts around the world. The official publication of the American Society for Artificial Internal Organs.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信