Enforcing accurate volume conservation in VOF-based long-term simulations of turbulent bubble-laden flows on coarse grids

IF 1.7 4区 工程技术 Q3 COMPUTER SCIENCE, INTERDISCIPLINARY APPLICATIONS
Elias Trautner, Josef Hasslberger, Paolo Cifani, Markus Klein
{"title":"Enforcing accurate volume conservation in VOF-based long-term simulations of turbulent bubble-laden flows on coarse grids","authors":"Elias Trautner,&nbsp;Josef Hasslberger,&nbsp;Paolo Cifani,&nbsp;Markus Klein","doi":"10.1002/fld.5279","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p>This study proposes two different strategies to enforce accurate volume conservation in volume-of-fluid (VOF)-based simulations of turbulent bubble-laden flows on coarse grids. It is demonstrated that, without a correction, minimal volume errors on a time-step level, caused by the under-resolution of the interface, can accumulate to significant deviations from the intended flow conditions despite the comparably good volume conservation properties of the geometric VOF method. In particular, large volume errors are observed for challenging setups combining coarse grid resolutions and comparably high Reynolds and Eötvös numbers. The problem is reinforced for long-term simulations in periodic domains, which are often performed to collect flow statistics of bubbly flows. The first proposed volume conservation method simply corrects the volume error of a bubble by uniformly adding or removing the respective amount of gas volume in the interface cells. The second proposed method performs an additional reconstruction and advection step of the VOF field using a non-divergence-free velocity field, which can be interpreted as a slight dilatation or contraction of the bubble. A comparison between the global flow statistics as well as the individual bubble dynamics for both volume conservation methods reveals that the results are quasi-identical for a number of challenging test cases, while the gas volume is accurately conserved. The proposed methods allow to perform numerical simulations of freely deformable bubbles in turbulent flows for setups that have previously been out of reach for this numerical framework.</p>","PeriodicalId":50348,"journal":{"name":"International Journal for Numerical Methods in Fluids","volume":"96 6","pages":"1057-1077"},"PeriodicalIF":1.7000,"publicationDate":"2024-03-05","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1002/fld.5279","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"International Journal for Numerical Methods in Fluids","FirstCategoryId":"5","ListUrlMain":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1002/fld.5279","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"工程技术","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"COMPUTER SCIENCE, INTERDISCIPLINARY APPLICATIONS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

This study proposes two different strategies to enforce accurate volume conservation in volume-of-fluid (VOF)-based simulations of turbulent bubble-laden flows on coarse grids. It is demonstrated that, without a correction, minimal volume errors on a time-step level, caused by the under-resolution of the interface, can accumulate to significant deviations from the intended flow conditions despite the comparably good volume conservation properties of the geometric VOF method. In particular, large volume errors are observed for challenging setups combining coarse grid resolutions and comparably high Reynolds and Eötvös numbers. The problem is reinforced for long-term simulations in periodic domains, which are often performed to collect flow statistics of bubbly flows. The first proposed volume conservation method simply corrects the volume error of a bubble by uniformly adding or removing the respective amount of gas volume in the interface cells. The second proposed method performs an additional reconstruction and advection step of the VOF field using a non-divergence-free velocity field, which can be interpreted as a slight dilatation or contraction of the bubble. A comparison between the global flow statistics as well as the individual bubble dynamics for both volume conservation methods reveals that the results are quasi-identical for a number of challenging test cases, while the gas volume is accurately conserved. The proposed methods allow to perform numerical simulations of freely deformable bubbles in turbulent flows for setups that have previously been out of reach for this numerical framework.

Abstract Image

在粗网格上基于 VOF 的含气泡湍流长期模拟中强制执行精确的体积守恒
本研究提出了两种不同的策略,用于在基于流体体积(VOF)的粗网格湍流气泡流模拟中执行精确的体积守恒。结果表明,尽管几何 VOF 方法具有相当好的体积守恒特性,但如果不进行修正,由于界面分辨率不足而导致的时间步级上的最小体积误差会累积成与预期流动条件的显著偏差。特别是在结合粗网格分辨率和相当高的雷诺数和埃特沃斯数的挑战性设置中,可以观察到较大的体积误差。这一问题在周期性区域的长期模拟中更为突出,而这种模拟通常是为了收集气泡流的流动统计数据。第一种建议的体积守恒方法只是通过在界面单元中均匀添加或移除相应数量的气体体积来修正气泡的体积误差。第二种拟议方法使用无发散速度场对 VOF 场执行额外的重建和平流步骤,这可以理解为气泡的轻微扩张或收缩。对两种体积守恒方法的全局流动统计和单个气泡动力学进行比较后发现,在一些具有挑战性的测试案例中,结果基本相同,同时气体体积得到了精确守恒。所提出的方法可以对湍流中的可自由变形气泡进行数值模拟,而以前的数值框架是无法实现这种模拟的。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
International Journal for Numerical Methods in Fluids
International Journal for Numerical Methods in Fluids 物理-计算机:跨学科应用
CiteScore
3.70
自引率
5.60%
发文量
111
审稿时长
8 months
期刊介绍: The International Journal for Numerical Methods in Fluids publishes refereed papers describing significant developments in computational methods that are applicable to scientific and engineering problems in fluid mechanics, fluid dynamics, micro and bio fluidics, and fluid-structure interaction. Numerical methods for solving ancillary equations, such as transport and advection and diffusion, are also relevant. The Editors encourage contributions in the areas of multi-physics, multi-disciplinary and multi-scale problems involving fluid subsystems, verification and validation, uncertainty quantification, and model reduction. Numerical examples that illustrate the described methods or their accuracy are in general expected. Discussions of papers already in print are also considered. However, papers dealing strictly with applications of existing methods or dealing with areas of research that are not deemed to be cutting edge by the Editors will not be considered for review. The journal publishes full-length papers, which should normally be less than 25 journal pages in length. Two-part papers are discouraged unless considered necessary by the Editors.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信