A New Fudge Factor for Persson’s Theory of Purely Normal Elastic Rough Surface Contact

IF 2.9 3区 工程技术 Q2 ENGINEERING, CHEMICAL
Yang Xu, Longan Zhu, Feiyun Xiao, Yunong Zhou
{"title":"A New Fudge Factor for Persson’s Theory of Purely Normal Elastic Rough Surface Contact","authors":"Yang Xu,&nbsp;Longan Zhu,&nbsp;Feiyun Xiao,&nbsp;Yunong Zhou","doi":"10.1007/s11249-024-01838-4","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><p>After more than two decades of development, Persson’s theory has become one of the dominantly used theoretical tools to analyze the interaction between a nominally flat rough surface and a rigid flat. The original theory (Persson in J. Chem. Phys. 115(8):3840–3861, 2001) tends to overestimate and underestimate the relative contact area and strain energy, respectively, for linear elastic purely normal contact. Several fudge factors, obtained empirically based on numerical solutions, have been used to amend the strain energy associated with each wavenumber, resulting in scale history-dependent formulations for the relative contact area and probability density function (PDF) of contact pressure, which significantly complicate the solution process. We provide a new fudge factor that results in simple formulations of the relative contact area and PDF of contact pressure, which only relies on the present scale. Compared with the relative contact area and PDF of contact pressure solved by Green’s Function Molecular Dynamics (GFMD), Persson’s theory using the new fudge factor shows similar accuracy to other variants. Among all variants of Persson’s theory, the use of the new hybrid formulation of strain energy results in the best agreement with GFMD. Using the new fudge factor, various interfacial properties (e.g., the average interfacial gap) can be derived with a simple form, and solved more quickly, with acceptable accuracy.</p><h3>Graphical Abstract</h3>\n<div><figure><div><div><picture><source><img></source></picture></div></div></figure></div></div>","PeriodicalId":806,"journal":{"name":"Tribology Letters","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":2.9000,"publicationDate":"2024-03-05","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Tribology Letters","FirstCategoryId":"5","ListUrlMain":"https://link.springer.com/article/10.1007/s11249-024-01838-4","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"工程技术","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"ENGINEERING, CHEMICAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

After more than two decades of development, Persson’s theory has become one of the dominantly used theoretical tools to analyze the interaction between a nominally flat rough surface and a rigid flat. The original theory (Persson in J. Chem. Phys. 115(8):3840–3861, 2001) tends to overestimate and underestimate the relative contact area and strain energy, respectively, for linear elastic purely normal contact. Several fudge factors, obtained empirically based on numerical solutions, have been used to amend the strain energy associated with each wavenumber, resulting in scale history-dependent formulations for the relative contact area and probability density function (PDF) of contact pressure, which significantly complicate the solution process. We provide a new fudge factor that results in simple formulations of the relative contact area and PDF of contact pressure, which only relies on the present scale. Compared with the relative contact area and PDF of contact pressure solved by Green’s Function Molecular Dynamics (GFMD), Persson’s theory using the new fudge factor shows similar accuracy to other variants. Among all variants of Persson’s theory, the use of the new hybrid formulation of strain energy results in the best agreement with GFMD. Using the new fudge factor, various interfacial properties (e.g., the average interfacial gap) can be derived with a simple form, and solved more quickly, with acceptable accuracy.

Graphical Abstract

佩尔松纯法向弹性粗糙表面接触理论的新软弱系数
摘要 经过二十多年的发展,佩尔松理论已成为分析名义上平坦的粗糙表面与刚性平面之间相互作用的主要理论工具之一。最初的理论(Persson 在 J. Chem.115(8):3840-3861, 2001)往往会分别高估和低估线性弹性纯法线接触的相对接触面积和应变能。根据数值求解经验获得的几个微调因子被用来修正与每个波数相关的应变能,从而产生了与尺度历史相关的相对接触面积和接触压力概率密度函数 (PDF) 公式,这大大增加了求解过程的复杂性。我们提供了一种新的微调因子,从而使相对接触面积和接触压力概率密度函数的计算公式变得简单,而且只依赖于当前的尺度。与格林函数分子动力学(GFMD)求解的相对接触面积和接触压力 PDF 相比,使用新的微分因子的佩尔松理论显示出与其他变体相似的精度。在佩尔松理论的所有变体中,使用新的应变能混合公式与 GFMD 的一致性最好。使用新的微分因子,各种界面特性(如平均界面间隙)都能以简单的形式推导出来,并能以可接受的精度更快地求解。 图表摘要
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Tribology Letters
Tribology Letters 工程技术-工程:化工
CiteScore
5.30
自引率
9.40%
发文量
116
审稿时长
2.5 months
期刊介绍: Tribology Letters is devoted to the development of the science of tribology and its applications, particularly focusing on publishing high-quality papers at the forefront of tribological science and that address the fundamentals of friction, lubrication, wear, or adhesion. The journal facilitates communication and exchange of seminal ideas among thousands of practitioners who are engaged worldwide in the pursuit of tribology-based science and technology.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信