Global dynamics of heterogeneous epidemic models with exponential and nonexponential latent period distributions

IF 4.6 Q2 MATERIALS SCIENCE, BIOMATERIALS
Huiping Zang, Yi Lin, Shengqiang Liu
{"title":"Global dynamics of heterogeneous epidemic models with exponential and nonexponential latent period distributions","authors":"Huiping Zang,&nbsp;Yi Lin,&nbsp;Shengqiang Liu","doi":"10.1111/sapm.12678","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p>Many epidemic models assume an exponential distribution for the latent stage, but this may not accurately represent reality and could impact disease transmission predictions. Previous studies for short time scale models have shown that the choice of latency distribution affects estimates of the epidemic peak, time to peak, and infection eradication time, but has little effect on the final infection size. However, it is unclear if these conclusions hold for long time scale models. To address this, we investigate the impact of different latency distributions on disease dynamics in long-term models, comparing them with short-term models. We propose two susceptible-exposed-infected-hospitalized-recovered (<span></span><math>\n <semantics>\n <mrow>\n <mi>S</mi>\n <mi>E</mi>\n <mi>I</mi>\n <mi>H</mi>\n <mi>R</mi>\n </mrow>\n <annotation>$SEIHR$</annotation>\n </semantics></math>) models with multiple groups, using exponential and gamma distributions for latency. We derive the basic reproduction number (<span></span><math>\n <semantics>\n <msub>\n <mi>R</mi>\n <mn>0</mn>\n </msub>\n <annotation>$R_{0}$</annotation>\n </semantics></math>) for both models and prove the global stability of the equilibrium points. We conduct numerical simulations and find that the gamma distribution may lead to larger epidemic peak sizes and longer peak times compared to the exponential distribution. However, the impact of latency distribution on estimating the peak and time to peak is smaller in long-term models than in short-term models. Additionally, the effect on the final total infected size is negligible regardless of the time scale. Therefore, when analyzing long-term epidemic dynamics using heterogeneity models, the choice of latency distribution does not significantly affect the results. Assuming an exponential distribution for the latency is sufficient for simplifying the model and facilitating analysis. Our study provides valuable insights for selecting appropriate mathematical models in epidemiology.</p>","PeriodicalId":2,"journal":{"name":"ACS Applied Bio Materials","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":4.6000,"publicationDate":"2024-03-05","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"ACS Applied Bio Materials","FirstCategoryId":"100","ListUrlMain":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/sapm.12678","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"MATERIALS SCIENCE, BIOMATERIALS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Many epidemic models assume an exponential distribution for the latent stage, but this may not accurately represent reality and could impact disease transmission predictions. Previous studies for short time scale models have shown that the choice of latency distribution affects estimates of the epidemic peak, time to peak, and infection eradication time, but has little effect on the final infection size. However, it is unclear if these conclusions hold for long time scale models. To address this, we investigate the impact of different latency distributions on disease dynamics in long-term models, comparing them with short-term models. We propose two susceptible-exposed-infected-hospitalized-recovered ( S E I H R $SEIHR$ ) models with multiple groups, using exponential and gamma distributions for latency. We derive the basic reproduction number ( R 0 $R_{0}$ ) for both models and prove the global stability of the equilibrium points. We conduct numerical simulations and find that the gamma distribution may lead to larger epidemic peak sizes and longer peak times compared to the exponential distribution. However, the impact of latency distribution on estimating the peak and time to peak is smaller in long-term models than in short-term models. Additionally, the effect on the final total infected size is negligible regardless of the time scale. Therefore, when analyzing long-term epidemic dynamics using heterogeneity models, the choice of latency distribution does not significantly affect the results. Assuming an exponential distribution for the latency is sufficient for simplifying the model and facilitating analysis. Our study provides valuable insights for selecting appropriate mathematical models in epidemiology.

具有指数和非指数潜伏期分布的异质性流行病模型的全局动力学
许多流行病模型假定潜伏期为指数分布,但这可能无法准确反映现实情况,并可能影响疾病传播的预测。以往对短时标模型的研究表明,潜伏期分布的选择会影响对流行高峰、达到高峰的时间和感染消除时间的估计,但对最终感染规模的影响很小。然而,目前还不清楚这些结论是否适用于长时间尺度模型。为了解决这个问题,我们研究了长期模型中不同潜伏期分布对疾病动态的影响,并与短期模型进行了比较。我们提出了两种具有多组的易感-暴露-感染-住院-康复()模型,并对潜伏期使用了指数分布和伽马分布。我们推导出了这两个模型的基本繁殖数(),并证明了平衡点的全局稳定性。我们进行了数值模拟,发现与指数分布相比,伽马分布可能会导致更大的流行高峰规模和更长的高峰时间。然而,在长期模型中,延迟分布对估计峰值和达到峰值时间的影响要小于短期模型。此外,无论时间尺度如何,对最终总感染规模的影响都可以忽略不计。因此,在使用异质性模型分析长期流行动态时,潜伏期分布的选择不会对结果产生重大影响。假设潜伏期呈指数分布,就足以简化模型并方便分析。我们的研究为在流行病学中选择合适的数学模型提供了宝贵的见解。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
ACS Applied Bio Materials
ACS Applied Bio Materials Chemistry-Chemistry (all)
CiteScore
9.40
自引率
2.10%
发文量
464
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信