Development and Validation of a Deep Learning Model to Reduce the Interference of Rectal Artifacts in MRI-based Prostate Cancer Diagnosis.

IF 8.1 Q1 COMPUTER SCIENCE, ARTIFICIAL INTELLIGENCE
Lei Hu, Xiangyu Guo, Dawei Zhou, Zhen Wang, Lisong Dai, Liang Li, Ying Li, Tian Zhang, Haining Long, Chengxin Yu, Zhen-Wei Shi, Chu Han, Cheng Lu, Jungong Zhao, Yuehua Li, Yunfei Zha, Zaiyi Liu
{"title":"Development and Validation of a Deep Learning Model to Reduce the Interference of Rectal Artifacts in MRI-based Prostate Cancer Diagnosis.","authors":"Lei Hu, Xiangyu Guo, Dawei Zhou, Zhen Wang, Lisong Dai, Liang Li, Ying Li, Tian Zhang, Haining Long, Chengxin Yu, Zhen-Wei Shi, Chu Han, Cheng Lu, Jungong Zhao, Yuehua Li, Yunfei Zha, Zaiyi Liu","doi":"10.1148/ryai.230362","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Purpose To develop an MRI-based model for clinically significant prostate cancer (csPCa) diagnosis that can resist rectal artifact interference. Materials and Methods This retrospective study included 2203 male patients with prostate lesions who underwent biparametric MRI and biopsy between January 2019 and June 2023. Targeted adversarial training with proprietary adversarial samples (TPAS) strategy was proposed to enhance model resistance against rectal artifacts. The automated csPCa diagnostic models trained with and without TPAS were compared using multicenter validation datasets. The impact of rectal artifacts on the diagnostic performance of each model at the patient and lesion levels was compared using the area under the receiver operating characteristic curve (AUC) and the area under the precision-recall curve (AUPRC). The AUC between models was compared using the DeLong test, and the AUPRC was compared using the bootstrap method. Results The TPAS model exhibited diagnostic performance improvements of 6% at the patient level (AUC: 0.87 vs 0.81, <i>P</i> < .001) and 7% at the lesion level (AUPRC: 0.84 vs 0.77, <i>P</i> = .007) compared with the control model. The TPAS model demonstrated less performance decline in the presence of rectal artifact-pattern adversarial noise than the control model (ΔAUC: -17% vs -19%, ΔAUPRC: -18% vs -21%). The TPAS model performed better than the control model in patients with moderate (AUC: 0.79 vs 0.73, AUPRC: 0.68 vs 0.61) and severe (AUC: 0.75 vs 0.57, AUPRC: 0.69 vs 0.59) artifacts. Conclusion This study demonstrates that the TPAS model can reduce rectal artifact interference in MRI-based csPCa diagnosis, thereby improving its performance in clinical applications. <b>Keywords:</b> MR-Diffusion-weighted Imaging, Urinary, Prostate, Comparative Studies, Diagnosis, Transfer Learning Clinical trial registration no. ChiCTR23000069832 <i>Supplemental material is available for this article.</i> Published under a CC BY 4.0 license.</p>","PeriodicalId":29787,"journal":{"name":"Radiology-Artificial Intelligence","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":8.1000,"publicationDate":"2024-03-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10985636/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Radiology-Artificial Intelligence","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1148/ryai.230362","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"COMPUTER SCIENCE, ARTIFICIAL INTELLIGENCE","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Purpose To develop an MRI-based model for clinically significant prostate cancer (csPCa) diagnosis that can resist rectal artifact interference. Materials and Methods This retrospective study included 2203 male patients with prostate lesions who underwent biparametric MRI and biopsy between January 2019 and June 2023. Targeted adversarial training with proprietary adversarial samples (TPAS) strategy was proposed to enhance model resistance against rectal artifacts. The automated csPCa diagnostic models trained with and without TPAS were compared using multicenter validation datasets. The impact of rectal artifacts on the diagnostic performance of each model at the patient and lesion levels was compared using the area under the receiver operating characteristic curve (AUC) and the area under the precision-recall curve (AUPRC). The AUC between models was compared using the DeLong test, and the AUPRC was compared using the bootstrap method. Results The TPAS model exhibited diagnostic performance improvements of 6% at the patient level (AUC: 0.87 vs 0.81, P < .001) and 7% at the lesion level (AUPRC: 0.84 vs 0.77, P = .007) compared with the control model. The TPAS model demonstrated less performance decline in the presence of rectal artifact-pattern adversarial noise than the control model (ΔAUC: -17% vs -19%, ΔAUPRC: -18% vs -21%). The TPAS model performed better than the control model in patients with moderate (AUC: 0.79 vs 0.73, AUPRC: 0.68 vs 0.61) and severe (AUC: 0.75 vs 0.57, AUPRC: 0.69 vs 0.59) artifacts. Conclusion This study demonstrates that the TPAS model can reduce rectal artifact interference in MRI-based csPCa diagnosis, thereby improving its performance in clinical applications. Keywords: MR-Diffusion-weighted Imaging, Urinary, Prostate, Comparative Studies, Diagnosis, Transfer Learning Clinical trial registration no. ChiCTR23000069832 Supplemental material is available for this article. Published under a CC BY 4.0 license.

深度学习模型的开发与验证:在基于核磁共振成像的前列腺癌诊断中减少直肠伪影的干扰》(Deep Learning Model of Development and Validation of a Deep Learning Model to Reduce Rectal Artifacts in MRI-based Prostate Cancer Diagnosis)。
"刚刚接受 "的论文经过同行评审,已被接受在《放射学》上发表:人工智能》上发表。这篇文章在以最终版本发表之前,还将经过校对、排版和校对审核。请注意,在制作最终校对稿的过程中,可能会发现一些错误,从而影响文章内容。目的 开发一种基于磁共振成像的临床重要前列腺癌(csPCa)诊断模型,该模型可抵御直肠伪影干扰。材料与方法 这项回顾性研究纳入了 2203 名男性前列腺病变患者,他们在 2019 年 1 月至 2023 年 6 月期间接受了双参数 MRI 和活检。为了增强模型对直肠伪影的抵抗力,研究人员提出了使用专有对抗样本(TPAS)进行有针对性对抗训练的策略。使用多中心验证数据集比较了使用和不使用 TPAS 训练的 csPCa 自动诊断模型。使用接收者操作特征曲线下面积(AUC)和精确度-召回曲线下面积(AUPRC)比较了直肠伪影对每个模型在患者和病灶层面诊断性能的影响。模型间的 AUC 采用 Delong 检验进行比较,AUPRC 采用 Bootstrap 方法进行比较。结果 与对照模型相比,TPAS 模型在患者层面的诊断性能提高了 6%(AUC:0.87 对 0.81;P < .001),在病灶层面的诊断性能提高了 7%(AUPRC:0.84 对 0.77;P = .007)。与对照模型相比,TPAS 模型在出现直肠伪影模式对抗噪声时的性能下降较少(ΔAUC:-17% 对 -19%;ΔAUPRC:-18% 对 -21%)。在中度(AUC:0.79 对 0.73;AUPRC:0.68 对 0.61)和重度(AUC:0.75 对 0.57;AUPRC:0.69 对 0.59)伪影患者中,TPAS 模型的表现优于对照模型。结论 本研究表明,TPAS 模型可以减少直肠伪影对基于 MRI 的 PCa 诊断的干扰,从而提高其在临床应用中的性能。以 CC BY 4.0 许可发布。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
16.20
自引率
1.00%
发文量
0
期刊介绍: Radiology: Artificial Intelligence is a bi-monthly publication that focuses on the emerging applications of machine learning and artificial intelligence in the field of imaging across various disciplines. This journal is available online and accepts multiple manuscript types, including Original Research, Technical Developments, Data Resources, Review articles, Editorials, Letters to the Editor and Replies, Special Reports, and AI in Brief.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信