Neuropathic pain after orthopaedic surgery with continuous peripheral nerve block.

IF 1 4区 医学 Q3 MEDICINE, GENERAL & INTERNAL
Phillip Kaasgaard Sperling, Nicolai Launa, Arash Ghaffari, Helle Rømer, Maibrit Pape B Sørensen, Ole Rahbek, Søren Kold, Jannie Bisgaard
{"title":"Neuropathic pain after orthopaedic surgery with continuous peripheral nerve block.","authors":"Phillip Kaasgaard Sperling, Nicolai Launa, Arash Ghaffari, Helle Rømer, Maibrit Pape B Sørensen, Ole Rahbek, Søren Kold, Jannie Bisgaard","doi":"10.61409/A09230581","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Introduction: </strong>Continuous peripheral nerve blocks (cPNBs) have shown favourable post-operative pain control results but may be associated with a risk for long-term neurological complications. This study sought to examine factors associated with persistent post-operative pain and potential neuropathy after orthopaedic lower-limb surgery with the use of post-operative cPNB.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Patients who underwent lower limb orthopaedic procedures with cPNBs between November 2021 to May 2022 were included. Patient demographics and perioperative data were noted. At discharge, patients completed the PainDetect (PD) questionnaire and were followed up six months after discharge.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Seventy-seven patients with a total of 171 catheters completed the follow up. The median time to follow-up was 214 days after catheter removal, and 18 patients (23%) had a PD score ≥ 13. Univariate analysis showed that multiple variables were associated with a PD score ≥ 13 at the six-month follow-up. Multiple logistic regression showed that a high PD score at discharge, high BMI and longer duration of cPNBs were associated with higher risk of having a PD score ≥ 13 at the six-month follow-up.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Several factors were associated with a higher risk of having possible neuropathy after six months. BMI, duration of catheter and PD score at discharge were correlated with risk of possible neuropathic pain.</p><p><strong>Funding: </strong>None.</p><p><strong>Trial registration: </strong>The study was a quality control project and therefore did not require registration under Danish law.</p>","PeriodicalId":11119,"journal":{"name":"Danish medical journal","volume":"71 3","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":1.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-02-15","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Danish medical journal","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.61409/A09230581","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"MEDICINE, GENERAL & INTERNAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Introduction: Continuous peripheral nerve blocks (cPNBs) have shown favourable post-operative pain control results but may be associated with a risk for long-term neurological complications. This study sought to examine factors associated with persistent post-operative pain and potential neuropathy after orthopaedic lower-limb surgery with the use of post-operative cPNB.

Methods: Patients who underwent lower limb orthopaedic procedures with cPNBs between November 2021 to May 2022 were included. Patient demographics and perioperative data were noted. At discharge, patients completed the PainDetect (PD) questionnaire and were followed up six months after discharge.

Results: Seventy-seven patients with a total of 171 catheters completed the follow up. The median time to follow-up was 214 days after catheter removal, and 18 patients (23%) had a PD score ≥ 13. Univariate analysis showed that multiple variables were associated with a PD score ≥ 13 at the six-month follow-up. Multiple logistic regression showed that a high PD score at discharge, high BMI and longer duration of cPNBs were associated with higher risk of having a PD score ≥ 13 at the six-month follow-up.

Conclusion: Several factors were associated with a higher risk of having possible neuropathy after six months. BMI, duration of catheter and PD score at discharge were correlated with risk of possible neuropathic pain.

Funding: None.

Trial registration: The study was a quality control project and therefore did not require registration under Danish law.

骨科手术后的神经性疼痛与连续周围神经阻滞。
简介连续性外周神经阻滞(cPNBs)显示出良好的术后疼痛控制效果,但可能与长期神经并发症的风险有关。本研究旨在探讨使用术后 cPNB 的下肢矫形手术后持续疼痛和潜在神经病变的相关因素:研究纳入了 2021 年 11 月至 2022 年 5 月期间接受下肢矫形手术并使用 cPNB 的患者。注意患者的人口统计学和围手术期数据。出院时,患者填写疼痛检测(PD)问卷,并在出院后六个月进行随访:共有 77 名患者完成了随访,共使用了 171 根导管。中位随访时间为拔除导管后 214 天,18 名患者(23%)的 PD 评分≥ 13 分。单变量分析显示,多个变量与六个月随访时 PD 评分≥13 相关。多元逻辑回归显示,出院时PD评分高、体重指数高和cPNB持续时间长与6个月随访时PD评分≥13分的风险较高有关:有几个因素与 6 个月后可能发生神经病变的较高风险有关。BMI、导管使用时间和出院时的PD评分与可能发生神经病理性疼痛的风险相关:无:该研究是一项质量控制项目,因此无需根据丹麦法律进行注册。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Danish medical journal
Danish medical journal MEDICINE, GENERAL & INTERNAL-
CiteScore
2.30
自引率
6.20%
发文量
78
审稿时长
3-8 weeks
期刊介绍: The Danish Medical Journal (DMJ) is a general medical journal. The journal publish original research in English – conducted in or in relation to the Danish health-care system. When writing for the Danish Medical Journal please remember target audience which is the general reader. This means that the research area should be relevant to many readers and the paper should be presented in a way that most readers will understand the content. DMJ will publish the following articles: • Original articles • Protocol articles from large randomized clinical trials • Systematic reviews and meta-analyses • PhD theses from Danish faculties of health sciences • DMSc theses from Danish faculties of health sciences.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信