How do price (risk) changes influence farmers’ preferences to reduce fertilizer application?

IF 4.5 3区 经济学 Q1 AGRICULTURAL ECONOMICS & POLICY
Sergei Schaub, Nadja El Benni
{"title":"How do price (risk) changes influence farmers’ preferences to reduce fertilizer application?","authors":"Sergei Schaub,&nbsp;Nadja El Benni","doi":"10.1111/agec.12824","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p>The decision of farmers to reduce fertilizer applications and, thus, the achievement of agri-environmental policy goals interacts with market price developments. In this study, we analyze how changes in price levels and volatility over time (i.e., 1991–2006 vs. 2007–2022) affected farmers’ preferences to reduce fertilizer application using statistical inferences of stochastic dominances. The analysis considers two cropping systems and fertilizer reduction measures: (i) grassland-based milk production and the use of legumes and (ii) wheat production and the use of variable rate application. We show that the economic value of reducing fertilizer increased over time in both grassland-based milk and wheat production. However, only in the case of wheat production was the reduction in fertilizer application observed as more risk-reducing over time. In contrast, in grassland-based milk production, the co-movement of fertilizer and milk prices canceled out the increase in risk reduction. We conclude that changes in market price, along with agri-environmental subsidies, can increasingly incentivize the reduction of fertilizer use.</p>","PeriodicalId":50837,"journal":{"name":"Agricultural Economics","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":4.5000,"publicationDate":"2024-03-03","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1111/agec.12824","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Agricultural Economics","FirstCategoryId":"96","ListUrlMain":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/agec.12824","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"经济学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"AGRICULTURAL ECONOMICS & POLICY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

The decision of farmers to reduce fertilizer applications and, thus, the achievement of agri-environmental policy goals interacts with market price developments. In this study, we analyze how changes in price levels and volatility over time (i.e., 1991–2006 vs. 2007–2022) affected farmers’ preferences to reduce fertilizer application using statistical inferences of stochastic dominances. The analysis considers two cropping systems and fertilizer reduction measures: (i) grassland-based milk production and the use of legumes and (ii) wheat production and the use of variable rate application. We show that the economic value of reducing fertilizer increased over time in both grassland-based milk and wheat production. However, only in the case of wheat production was the reduction in fertilizer application observed as more risk-reducing over time. In contrast, in grassland-based milk production, the co-movement of fertilizer and milk prices canceled out the increase in risk reduction. We conclude that changes in market price, along with agri-environmental subsidies, can increasingly incentivize the reduction of fertilizer use.

Abstract Image

价格(风险)变化如何影响农民减少化肥施用量的偏好?
农民减少化肥施用量的决策以及农业环境政策目标的实现与市场价格的发展相互影响。在本研究中,我们利用随机占优的统计推断方法,分析了价格水平和波动随时间(即 1991-2006 年与 2007-2022 年)的变化如何影响农民减少化肥施用量的偏好。分析考虑了两种耕作制度和减少化肥施用量的措施:(i) 以草原为基础的牛奶生产和豆科植物的使用;(ii) 小麦生产和可变施肥量的使用。我们发现,在以草原为基础的牛奶和小麦生产中,减少化肥的经济价值随着时间的推移而增加。然而,只有在小麦生产中,随着时间的推移,减少化肥施用量才更能降低风险。相反,在以草原为基础的牛奶生产中,化肥和牛奶价格的共同变动抵消了风险降低的增加。我们的结论是,市场价格的变化与农业环境补贴一起,可以越来越多地激励化肥使用量的减少。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Agricultural Economics
Agricultural Economics 管理科学-农业经济与政策
CiteScore
7.30
自引率
4.90%
发文量
62
审稿时长
3 months
期刊介绍: Agricultural Economics aims to disseminate the most important research results and policy analyses in our discipline, from all regions of the world. Topical coverage ranges from consumption and nutrition to land use and the environment, at every scale of analysis from households to markets and the macro-economy. Applicable methodologies include econometric estimation and statistical hypothesis testing, optimization and simulation models, descriptive reviews and policy analyses. We particularly encourage submission of empirical work that can be replicated and tested by others.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信