Reframing Research and Assessment Practices: Advancing an Antiracist and Anti-Ableist Research Agenda

IF 2.7 4区 教育学 Q1 EDUCATION & EDUCATIONAL RESEARCH
Angela Johnson, Elizabeth Barker, Marcos Viveros Cespedes
{"title":"Reframing Research and Assessment Practices: Advancing an Antiracist and Anti-Ableist Research Agenda","authors":"Angela Johnson,&nbsp;Elizabeth Barker,&nbsp;Marcos Viveros Cespedes","doi":"10.1111/emip.12601","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p>Educators and researchers strive to build policies and practices on data and evidence, especially on academic achievement scores. When assessment scores are inaccurate for specific student populations or when scores are inappropriately used, even data-driven decisions will be misinformed. To maximize the impact of the research-practice-policy collaborative, every stage of the assessment and research process needs to be critically interrogated. In this paper, we highlight the need to reframe assessment and research for multilingual learners, students with disabilities, and multilingual students with disabilities. We outline a framework that integrates three critical perspectives (QuantCrit, DisCrit, and critical multiculturalism) and discuss how this framework can be applied to assessment creation and research.</p>","PeriodicalId":47345,"journal":{"name":"Educational Measurement-Issues and Practice","volume":"43 3","pages":"95-105"},"PeriodicalIF":2.7000,"publicationDate":"2024-03-03","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Educational Measurement-Issues and Practice","FirstCategoryId":"95","ListUrlMain":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/emip.12601","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"教育学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"EDUCATION & EDUCATIONAL RESEARCH","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Educators and researchers strive to build policies and practices on data and evidence, especially on academic achievement scores. When assessment scores are inaccurate for specific student populations or when scores are inappropriately used, even data-driven decisions will be misinformed. To maximize the impact of the research-practice-policy collaborative, every stage of the assessment and research process needs to be critically interrogated. In this paper, we highlight the need to reframe assessment and research for multilingual learners, students with disabilities, and multilingual students with disabilities. We outline a framework that integrates three critical perspectives (QuantCrit, DisCrit, and critical multiculturalism) and discuss how this framework can be applied to assessment creation and research.

重构研究与评估实践:推进反种族主义和反偏见研究议程
教育工作者和研究人员努力根据数据和证据,特别是学业成绩分数来制定政策和实践。如果针对特定学生群体的评估分数不准确,或者分数使用不当,那么即使是数据驱动的决策也会被误导。为了最大限度地发挥 "研究-实践-政策 "合作的影响,需要对评估和研究过程的每一个阶段进行严格审查。在本文中,我们强调了为多语言学习者、残疾学生和多语言残疾学生重新构建评估和研究的必要性。我们概述了一个整合了三种批判性视角(QuantCrit、DisCrit 和批判性多元文化主义)的框架,并讨论了如何将这一框架应用于评估创建和研究。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
3.90
自引率
15.00%
发文量
47
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信