The influence of prairie strips sown in midwestern corn and soybean fields on sediment discharge throughout the year

IF 2.2 4区 农林科学 Q2 ECOLOGY
J.A. Stephenson, M. Liebman, J. Niemi, R. Cruse, J. Tyndall, C. Witte, D. James, M. Helmers
{"title":"The influence of prairie strips sown in midwestern corn and soybean fields on sediment discharge throughout the year","authors":"J.A. Stephenson, M. Liebman, J. Niemi, R. Cruse, J. Tyndall, C. Witte, D. James, M. Helmers","doi":"10.2489/jswc.2024.00037","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Many crop fields in the United States Corn Belt continue to erode at rates in excess of soil regeneration leading to sediment being transported from farms to adjacent surface water and degrading wildlife habitat. To reduce or eliminate sediment loss, vegetative filter strips can be established perpendicular to the hillslope and at the edge-of-field to intercept and filter surface runoff transporting sediment. The filter strips can be planted with native prairie vegetation to filter sediment out of runoff as well as establishing high quality habitat. A long-term study at Neal Smith Wildlife Refuge Farm in central Iowa found that with as little as 10% of a field converted to prairie filter strips, sediment discharge from fields could be reduced up to 95%. To improve our understanding of prairie filter strips and erosion processes over a broader range of landscapes, this study was conducted at six farm sites throughout Iowa. Following a paired treatment approach, each farm site was broken into two different subcatchments; one subcatchment was fully cropped (control) while the other had a portion of the field sown with native prairie vegetation. Each subcatchment had an H-flume installed to sample runoff water and determine the total suspended sediment (TSS) load and a rain gauge to monitor rainfall amount, frequency, and duration. Between 2016 and 2021, subcatchments with prairie strips median TSS load was 89.5% lower (95% CI, 69.2% to 96.4%, p < 0.001) than the control subcatchments. In fields when corn was planted, the subcatchments with prairie strips had significantly lower TSS discharged, with a median TSS load 97.6% less (95% CI, 92.1% to 99.3%, p < 0.001) compared to the control subcatchments. The TSS loads were significantly influenced by the amount of rainfall ( p < 0.001) despite the treatment. To investigate effects of seasonality and rainfall amount, the data set was parsed out based on the growing season of the dominant cropping system. There was no prairie strip effect during the primary growing months (PGS) (May to August); however, outside of the primary growing months (OPGS) (March to April and September to November) the prairie strip subcatchments median TSS load was 96.1% less (95% CI, 82.5% to 99.1%, p < 0.001) than the controls. The significant interaction of crop planted with prairie strip treatment and the differences between PGS and OPGS suggest that prairie strips have the capacity to reduce sediment leaving a field when they are the most vulnerable to effects of splash erosion (i.e., low ground cover and higher rainfall amount). Climate change models predict that areas like Iowa will continue to trend toward higher frequency and intensity rain events, so the compounded benefits of prairie planted in cropped fields could promote biodiverse landscapes that increase resilience to predicted effects from climate change during parts of the year when the land is more susceptible to erosion.","PeriodicalId":50049,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Soil and Water Conservation","volume":"21 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.2000,"publicationDate":"2024-03-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Soil and Water Conservation","FirstCategoryId":"97","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.2489/jswc.2024.00037","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"农林科学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"ECOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Many crop fields in the United States Corn Belt continue to erode at rates in excess of soil regeneration leading to sediment being transported from farms to adjacent surface water and degrading wildlife habitat. To reduce or eliminate sediment loss, vegetative filter strips can be established perpendicular to the hillslope and at the edge-of-field to intercept and filter surface runoff transporting sediment. The filter strips can be planted with native prairie vegetation to filter sediment out of runoff as well as establishing high quality habitat. A long-term study at Neal Smith Wildlife Refuge Farm in central Iowa found that with as little as 10% of a field converted to prairie filter strips, sediment discharge from fields could be reduced up to 95%. To improve our understanding of prairie filter strips and erosion processes over a broader range of landscapes, this study was conducted at six farm sites throughout Iowa. Following a paired treatment approach, each farm site was broken into two different subcatchments; one subcatchment was fully cropped (control) while the other had a portion of the field sown with native prairie vegetation. Each subcatchment had an H-flume installed to sample runoff water and determine the total suspended sediment (TSS) load and a rain gauge to monitor rainfall amount, frequency, and duration. Between 2016 and 2021, subcatchments with prairie strips median TSS load was 89.5% lower (95% CI, 69.2% to 96.4%, p < 0.001) than the control subcatchments. In fields when corn was planted, the subcatchments with prairie strips had significantly lower TSS discharged, with a median TSS load 97.6% less (95% CI, 92.1% to 99.3%, p < 0.001) compared to the control subcatchments. The TSS loads were significantly influenced by the amount of rainfall ( p < 0.001) despite the treatment. To investigate effects of seasonality and rainfall amount, the data set was parsed out based on the growing season of the dominant cropping system. There was no prairie strip effect during the primary growing months (PGS) (May to August); however, outside of the primary growing months (OPGS) (March to April and September to November) the prairie strip subcatchments median TSS load was 96.1% less (95% CI, 82.5% to 99.1%, p < 0.001) than the controls. The significant interaction of crop planted with prairie strip treatment and the differences between PGS and OPGS suggest that prairie strips have the capacity to reduce sediment leaving a field when they are the most vulnerable to effects of splash erosion (i.e., low ground cover and higher rainfall amount). Climate change models predict that areas like Iowa will continue to trend toward higher frequency and intensity rain events, so the compounded benefits of prairie planted in cropped fields could promote biodiverse landscapes that increase resilience to predicted effects from climate change during parts of the year when the land is more susceptible to erosion.
中西部玉米田和大豆田中播种的草原带对全年沉积物排放量的影响
美国玉米带的许多作物田的侵蚀速度仍然超过土壤再生速度,导致沉积物从农场流向邻近的地表水,并使野生动物栖息地退化。为了减少或消除泥沙流失,可以在垂直于山坡和田地边缘的地方建立植被过滤带,以拦截和过滤输送泥沙的地表径流。过滤带可种植本地草原植被,以过滤径流中的沉积物,并建立高质量的栖息地。在爱荷华州中部的尼尔-史密斯野生动物保护农场进行的一项长期研究发现,只要将田地的 10% 改造成草原过滤带,就能将田地的沉积物排放量减少 95%。为了更好地了解草原过滤带和更广泛的地貌侵蚀过程,这项研究在爱荷华州的六个农场进行。按照配对处理的方法,每个农场场地被分成两个不同的子流域;一个子流域被完全耕种(对照组),而另一个子流域的部分田地则播种了原生草原植被。每个子流域都安装了一个 H 型水槽,用于采集径流水样并确定总悬浮物 (TSS) 负荷,还安装了一个雨量计,用于监测降雨量、降雨频率和降雨持续时间。2016 年至 2021 年期间,与对照子流域相比,种植了草原带的子流域 TSS 负荷中位数降低了 89.5%(95% CI,69.2% 至 96.4%,p < 0.001)。在种植玉米的田块中,有草原带的子流域排放的 TSS 量明显较低,与对照子流域相比,TSS 量中值降低了 97.6%(95% CI,92.1% 至 99.3%,p < 0.001)。尽管采用了不同的处理方法,但总悬浮固体负荷仍受到降雨量的显著影响(p < 0.001)。为了研究季节性和降雨量的影响,根据主要种植系统的生长季节对数据集进行了解析。在主要生长月(PGS)(5 月至 8 月)期间,草原带没有影响;但在主要生长月(OPGS)(3 月至 4 月和 9 月至 11 月)之外,草原带子流域的 TSS 负荷中位数比对照组低 96.1%(95% CI,82.5% 至 99.1%,p < 0.001)。作物种植与草原带处理之间的显着交互作用以及 PGS 和 OPGS 之间的差异表明,草原带有能力在最容易受到飞溅侵蚀影响的时候(即地面覆盖率低、降雨量大的时候)减少泥沙离开田地。据气候变化模型预测,爱荷华州等地区的降雨频率和强度将继续呈上升趋势,因此在耕地中种植大草原的复合效益可促进生物多样性景观,从而在一年中土地更容易受到侵蚀的时期提高对气候变化预测影响的适应能力。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
4.10
自引率
2.60%
发文量
0
审稿时长
3.3 months
期刊介绍: The Journal of Soil and Water Conservation (JSWC) is a multidisciplinary journal of natural resource conservation research, practice, policy, and perspectives. The journal has two sections: the A Section containing various departments and features, and the Research Section containing peer-reviewed research papers.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信