Gender drag and parody: Performances of professionalism by two young Chinese women academics

IF 2.6 3区 教育学 Q1 EDUCATION & EDUCATIONAL RESEARCH
Li Bao
{"title":"Gender drag and parody: Performances of professionalism by two young Chinese women academics","authors":"Li Bao","doi":"10.1016/j.ijer.2024.102328","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><p>In recent decades, research has extensively explored the contextualized performances of women academics, primarily focusing on their academic achievements linked to career progression, predominantly within Western contexts. This study, however, delves into the nonacademic strategies employed by Chinese women academics to establish their professionalism within China’s neoliberal academic and institutional discourses. This approach contributes to a more nuanced understanding of women academics within the Asian higher education context. To unravel this issue, the study employs Butlerian theoretical concepts of drag and parody, qualitatively examining the experiences of two young Chinese women academics. It investigates how they navigate gender performance to portray professionalism through a feminist poststructural lens. The findings reveal that women academics encounter nonacademic assessments that significantly influence their career advancement. This paper provides valuable insights into the challenges faced by Chinese women academics concerning gender and academic subjectivities. It highlights their utilization of dragging and parodic acts as strategies to redefine their academic “excellence.” These discoveries prompt reflection on the profound impact of academic and institutional discourses as modes of governance on Chinese women academics.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":48076,"journal":{"name":"International Journal of Educational Research","volume":"125 ","pages":"Article 102328"},"PeriodicalIF":2.6000,"publicationDate":"2024-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"International Journal of Educational Research","FirstCategoryId":"95","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0883035524000156","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"教育学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"EDUCATION & EDUCATIONAL RESEARCH","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

In recent decades, research has extensively explored the contextualized performances of women academics, primarily focusing on their academic achievements linked to career progression, predominantly within Western contexts. This study, however, delves into the nonacademic strategies employed by Chinese women academics to establish their professionalism within China’s neoliberal academic and institutional discourses. This approach contributes to a more nuanced understanding of women academics within the Asian higher education context. To unravel this issue, the study employs Butlerian theoretical concepts of drag and parody, qualitatively examining the experiences of two young Chinese women academics. It investigates how they navigate gender performance to portray professionalism through a feminist poststructural lens. The findings reveal that women academics encounter nonacademic assessments that significantly influence their career advancement. This paper provides valuable insights into the challenges faced by Chinese women academics concerning gender and academic subjectivities. It highlights their utilization of dragging and parodic acts as strategies to redefine their academic “excellence.” These discoveries prompt reflection on the profound impact of academic and institutional discourses as modes of governance on Chinese women academics.

性别拖曳与模仿:两位中国年轻女学者的专业精神表演
近几十年来,相关研究广泛探讨了女学者在不同背景下的表现,主要集中在她们与职业发展相关的学术成就上,这主要是在西方背景下进行的。而本研究则深入探讨了中国女学者为在中国新自由主义学术和制度话语中确立其专业性而采取的非学术策略。这种研究方法有助于我们更细致地了解亚洲高等教育背景下的女学者。为了揭示这一问题,本研究采用了布特勒理论中的 "变装 "和 "戏仿 "概念,对两位年轻的中国女学者的经历进行了定性研究。研究从女性主义后结构视角出发,探讨了她们如何通过性别表演来塑造专业形象。研究结果表明,女学者遇到的非学术评价极大地影响了她们的职业发展。本文就中国女学者在性别和学术主体性方面所面临的挑战提供了有价值的见解。它强调了她们利用拖沓和模仿行为作为重新定义其学术 "卓越性 "的策略。这些发现促使我们反思作为管理模式的学术和机构话语对中国女学者的深刻影响。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
International Journal of Educational Research
International Journal of Educational Research EDUCATION & EDUCATIONAL RESEARCH-
CiteScore
6.20
自引率
3.10%
发文量
141
审稿时长
21 days
期刊介绍: The International Journal of Educational Research publishes regular papers and special issues on specific topics of interest to international audiences of educational researchers. Examples of recent Special Issues published in the journal illustrate the breadth of topics that have be included in the journal: Students Perspectives on Learning Environments, Social, Motivational and Emotional Aspects of Learning Disabilities, Epistemological Beliefs and Domain, Analyzing Mathematics Classroom Cultures and Practices, and Music Education: A site for collaborative creativity.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信