Sedentary activity, sedentary bouts, and patterns of total daily sedentary activity, and their relationship with stress and well-being in individuals with diabetes and prediabetes: The Lolland-Falster Health Study

IF 4.6 Q2 MATERIALS SCIENCE, BIOMATERIALS
Sofie Rath Mortensen , Anders Grøntved , Jan Christian Brønd , Mathias Ried-Larsen , Therese Lockenwitz Petersen , Lars Bo Jørgensen , Randi Jepsen , Lars Hermann Tang , Søren T. Skou
{"title":"Sedentary activity, sedentary bouts, and patterns of total daily sedentary activity, and their relationship with stress and well-being in individuals with diabetes and prediabetes: The Lolland-Falster Health Study","authors":"Sofie Rath Mortensen ,&nbsp;Anders Grøntved ,&nbsp;Jan Christian Brønd ,&nbsp;Mathias Ried-Larsen ,&nbsp;Therese Lockenwitz Petersen ,&nbsp;Lars Bo Jørgensen ,&nbsp;Randi Jepsen ,&nbsp;Lars Hermann Tang ,&nbsp;Søren T. Skou","doi":"10.1016/j.mhpa.2024.100588","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Aims</h3><p>This study aimed to investigate the cross-sectional associations of stress and well-being with the total amount of sedentary activity and sedentary bouts in adults with diabetes and prediabetes. A secondary aim was to explore the sedentary activity pattern during a day in adults with diabetes and prediabetes.</p></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><p>This cross-sectional study from the Danish Lolland-Falster Health Study categorized participants into diabetes (including both type 1 and type 2 diabetes) and prediabetes based on their HbA1c level and self-reported use of diabetes medication. Exposures were Perceived Stress Scale (scores ≥18 = moderate to high stress) and WHO-5 Well-Being Index (scores ≤50 = low well-being). Outcomes were total daily sedentary activity and sedentary bouts assessed with thigh-worn and back-worn accelerometers.</p></div><div><h3>Results</h3><p>Among the 562 included adult participants, 15 % had low well-being and 65 % had moderate to high stress. Higher well-being was associated with lower total sedentary activity in participants with diabetes (−1.1 min/day, 95 % CI -2.0; −0.2, for every 1-point increase in WHO-score) and participants with prediabetes (−0.6 min/day, 95 % CI -1.1; −0.05, for every 1-point increase in WHO-score). No association was found between stress and sedentary activity. During a day, participants with diabetes were more sedentary with a mean difference of −0.7 h/day (95 % CI -1.1; −0.4) when compared with participants with prediabetes.</p></div><div><h3>Conclusions</h3><p>This study found that higher well-being is associated with lower total daily sedentary activity in individuals with diabetes and prediabetes, while no association between stress and sedentary activity was found. These findings imply that individuals with diabetes and prediabetes and low well-being may need additional support to reduce time spent on daily sedentary activity.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":2,"journal":{"name":"ACS Applied Bio Materials","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":4.6000,"publicationDate":"2024-03-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1755296624000139/pdfft?md5=d5ae55b60171cb97b964db45bf2010b9&pid=1-s2.0-S1755296624000139-main.pdf","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"ACS Applied Bio Materials","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1755296624000139","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"MATERIALS SCIENCE, BIOMATERIALS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Aims

This study aimed to investigate the cross-sectional associations of stress and well-being with the total amount of sedentary activity and sedentary bouts in adults with diabetes and prediabetes. A secondary aim was to explore the sedentary activity pattern during a day in adults with diabetes and prediabetes.

Methods

This cross-sectional study from the Danish Lolland-Falster Health Study categorized participants into diabetes (including both type 1 and type 2 diabetes) and prediabetes based on their HbA1c level and self-reported use of diabetes medication. Exposures were Perceived Stress Scale (scores ≥18 = moderate to high stress) and WHO-5 Well-Being Index (scores ≤50 = low well-being). Outcomes were total daily sedentary activity and sedentary bouts assessed with thigh-worn and back-worn accelerometers.

Results

Among the 562 included adult participants, 15 % had low well-being and 65 % had moderate to high stress. Higher well-being was associated with lower total sedentary activity in participants with diabetes (−1.1 min/day, 95 % CI -2.0; −0.2, for every 1-point increase in WHO-score) and participants with prediabetes (−0.6 min/day, 95 % CI -1.1; −0.05, for every 1-point increase in WHO-score). No association was found between stress and sedentary activity. During a day, participants with diabetes were more sedentary with a mean difference of −0.7 h/day (95 % CI -1.1; −0.4) when compared with participants with prediabetes.

Conclusions

This study found that higher well-being is associated with lower total daily sedentary activity in individuals with diabetes and prediabetes, while no association between stress and sedentary activity was found. These findings imply that individuals with diabetes and prediabetes and low well-being may need additional support to reduce time spent on daily sedentary activity.

糖尿病患者和糖尿病前期患者的久坐活动、久坐阵发、每日总久坐活动模式及其与压力和幸福感的关系:洛兰-法尔斯特健康研究
研究目的:本研究旨在调查糖尿病和糖尿病前期成人患者的压力和幸福感与久坐活动总量和久坐次数之间的横断面关联。方法这项横断面研究来自丹麦洛兰-法尔斯特健康研究(Danish Lolland-Falster Health Study),根据参与者的 HbA1c 水平和自我报告的糖尿病药物使用情况,将其分为糖尿病(包括 1 型和 2 型糖尿病)和糖尿病前期。暴露量表为感知压力量表(得分≥18分=中度至高度压力)和WHO-5幸福指数(得分≤50分=低幸福感)。结果562名成年参与者中,15%的人幸福感较低,65%的人有中度至高度压力。幸福感越高,糖尿病患者的总久坐活动量越低(WHO评分每增加1分,久坐活动量为-1.1分钟/天,95% CI为-2.0;-0.2),糖尿病前期患者的久坐活动量也越低(WHO评分每增加1分,久坐活动量为-0.6分钟/天,95% CI为-1.1;-0.05)。压力与久坐不动之间没有关联。与糖尿病前期患者相比,糖尿病患者在一天中的久坐时间更长,平均差异为-0.7小时/天(95 % CI -1.1; -0.4)。结论这项研究发现,糖尿病患者和糖尿病前期患者的幸福感越高,每天的久坐活动总量就越低,而压力与久坐活动之间没有关联。这些研究结果表明,糖尿病和糖尿病前期患者如果幸福感较低,可能需要额外的支持来减少每天久坐不动的时间。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
ACS Applied Bio Materials
ACS Applied Bio Materials Chemistry-Chemistry (all)
CiteScore
9.40
自引率
2.10%
发文量
464
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信