SURGICAL DRAINAGE METHODS DURING PARS PLANA VITRECTOMY FOR RHEGMATOGENOUS RETINAL DETACHMENT: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.

IF 2.3 2区 医学 Q2 OPHTHALMOLOGY
Justin R Grad, Amin Hatamnejad, Peter W Huan, Marko M Popovic, Bryon R McKay, Peter J Kertes, Rajeev H Muni
{"title":"SURGICAL DRAINAGE METHODS DURING PARS PLANA VITRECTOMY FOR RHEGMATOGENOUS RETINAL DETACHMENT: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.","authors":"Justin R Grad, Amin Hatamnejad, Peter W Huan, Marko M Popovic, Bryon R McKay, Peter J Kertes, Rajeev H Muni","doi":"10.1097/IAE.0000000000004083","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Purpose: </strong>To assess efficacy and safety outcomes of subretinal fluid drainage methods during pars plana vitrectomy for rhegmatogenous retinal detachment.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>A systematic search strategy was conducted for studies published between January 2000 and October 2022. Included studies reported on either the safety or efficacy of two or more drainage methods during pars plana vitrectomy for patients with rhegmatogenous retinal detachment.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Two randomized and five observational studies consisting of 1,524 eyes were included. Best-corrected visual acuity at the last study observation and primary reattachment rates were similar across groups. A significantly lower risk of epiretinal membrane formation was associated with draining subretinal fluid through preexisting retinal breaks (risk ratio = 0.70, 95% confidence interval = [0.60, 0.83], P = <0.01, I 2 = 0%) or with perfluorocarbon liquid (risk ratios = 0.70, 95% confidence interval = [0.59, 0.83], P = <0.01, I 2 = 0%) compared with posterior retinotomy. The risk of an abnormal foveal contour was significantly greater in perfluorocarbon liquid-treated eyes relative to posterior retinotomy (risk ratios = 1.56, 95% confidence interval = [1.13, 2.17], P = <0.01, I 2 = 0%).</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>No significant differences were observed in the final best-corrected visual acuity at the last study observation and primary reattachment rates across different drainage methods. There remains limited information on the topic, so future research is warranted.</p>","PeriodicalId":54486,"journal":{"name":"Retina-The Journal of Retinal and Vitreous Diseases","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":2.3000,"publicationDate":"2024-05-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Retina-The Journal of Retinal and Vitreous Diseases","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1097/IAE.0000000000004083","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"OPHTHALMOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Purpose: To assess efficacy and safety outcomes of subretinal fluid drainage methods during pars plana vitrectomy for rhegmatogenous retinal detachment.

Methods: A systematic search strategy was conducted for studies published between January 2000 and October 2022. Included studies reported on either the safety or efficacy of two or more drainage methods during pars plana vitrectomy for patients with rhegmatogenous retinal detachment.

Results: Two randomized and five observational studies consisting of 1,524 eyes were included. Best-corrected visual acuity at the last study observation and primary reattachment rates were similar across groups. A significantly lower risk of epiretinal membrane formation was associated with draining subretinal fluid through preexisting retinal breaks (risk ratio = 0.70, 95% confidence interval = [0.60, 0.83], P = <0.01, I 2 = 0%) or with perfluorocarbon liquid (risk ratios = 0.70, 95% confidence interval = [0.59, 0.83], P = <0.01, I 2 = 0%) compared with posterior retinotomy. The risk of an abnormal foveal contour was significantly greater in perfluorocarbon liquid-treated eyes relative to posterior retinotomy (risk ratios = 1.56, 95% confidence interval = [1.13, 2.17], P = <0.01, I 2 = 0%).

Conclusion: No significant differences were observed in the final best-corrected visual acuity at the last study observation and primary reattachment rates across different drainage methods. There remains limited information on the topic, so future research is warranted.

流变性视网膜脱离的玻璃体旁切除术中的手术引流方法:系统综述和荟萃分析。
目的:评估流变性视网膜脱离(RRD)的玻璃体旁切除术(PPV)中视网膜下积液引流方法的有效性和安全性:对2000年1月至2022年10月期间发表的研究进行了系统性检索。方法:对 2000 年 1 月至 2022 年 10 月间发表的研究进行了系统性检索,纳入的研究报告了 RRD 患者 PPV 期间两种或两种以上引流方法的安全性或有效性:结果:共纳入了 2 项随机研究和 5 项观察性研究,涉及 1524 只眼睛。各组在最后一次研究观察时的最佳矫正视力和初次再接合率相似。通过先前存在的视网膜断裂(PRB)引流视网膜下积液与视网膜上膜形成(ERM)的风险明显较低(RR= 0.70,95% CI=[0.60,0.83],p=结论:不同引流方法在最后一次研究观察时的最终 BCVA 和原发性再粘连率方面无明显差异。有关该主题的信息仍然有限,未来的研究值得期待。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
5.70
自引率
9.10%
发文量
554
审稿时长
3-6 weeks
期刊介绍: ​RETINA® focuses exclusively on the growing specialty of vitreoretinal disorders. The Journal provides current information on diagnostic and therapeutic techniques. Its highly specialized and informative, peer-reviewed articles are easily applicable to clinical practice. In addition to regular reports from clinical and basic science investigators, RETINA® publishes special features including periodic review articles on pertinent topics, special articles dealing with surgical and other therapeutic techniques, and abstract cards. Issues are abundantly illustrated in vivid full color. Published 12 times per year, RETINA® is truly a “must have” publication for anyone connected to this field.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信