First and Second Stage Risk Factors Associated with Perineal Lacerations.

IF 1.8 4区 医学 Q3 PUBLIC, ENVIRONMENTAL & OCCUPATIONAL HEALTH
Maternal and Child Health Journal Pub Date : 2024-07-01 Epub Date: 2024-03-05 DOI:10.1007/s10995-024-03919-1
Alexander M Saucedo, Methodius G Tuuli, W Thomas Gregory, Holly E Richter, Jerry L Lowder, Candice Woolfolk, Aaron B Caughey, Sindhu K Srinivas, Alan T N Tita, George A Macones, Alison G Cahill
{"title":"First and Second Stage Risk Factors Associated with Perineal Lacerations.","authors":"Alexander M Saucedo, Methodius G Tuuli, W Thomas Gregory, Holly E Richter, Jerry L Lowder, Candice Woolfolk, Aaron B Caughey, Sindhu K Srinivas, Alan T N Tita, George A Macones, Alison G Cahill","doi":"10.1007/s10995-024-03919-1","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>To determine intrapartum factors associated with perineal laceration at delivery.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>This was a planned secondary analysis of a multicenter randomized clinical trial of delayed versus immediate pushing among term nulliparous women in labor with neuraxial analgesia conducted in the United States. Intrapartum characteristics were extracted from the medical charts. The primary outcome was perineal laceration, defined as second degree or above, characterized at delivery in women participating in longer term pelvic floor assessments post-delivery. Multivariable logistic regression was used to refine risk estimates while adjusting for randomization group, birth weight, and maternal age.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Among the 941 women participating in the pelvic floor follow-up, 40.6% experienced a perineal laceration. No first stage labor characteristics were associated with perineal laceration, including type of labor or length of first stage. Receiving an amnioinfusion appeared protective of perineal laceration (adjusted odds ratio, 0.48; 95% confidence interval 0.26-0.91; P = 0.01). Second stage labor characteristics associated with injury were length of stage (2.01 h vs. 1.50 h; adjusted odds ratio, 1.36; 95% confidence interval 1.18-1.57; P < 0.01) and a prolonged second stage (adjusted odds ratio, 1.64; 95% confidence interval 1.06-2.56; P < 0.01). Operative vaginal delivery was strongly associated with perineal laceration (adjusted odds ratio, 3.57; 95% confidence interval 1.85-6.90; P < 0.01).</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Operative vaginal delivery is a modifiable risk factor associated with an increased risk of perineal laceration. Amnioinfusion appeared protective against injury, which could reflect a spurious finding, but may also represent true risk reduction similar to the mechanism of warm perineal compress.</p>","PeriodicalId":48367,"journal":{"name":"Maternal and Child Health Journal","volume":" ","pages":"1228-1233"},"PeriodicalIF":1.8000,"publicationDate":"2024-07-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Maternal and Child Health Journal","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1007/s10995-024-03919-1","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2024/3/5 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"PUBLIC, ENVIRONMENTAL & OCCUPATIONAL HEALTH","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Objective: To determine intrapartum factors associated with perineal laceration at delivery.

Methods: This was a planned secondary analysis of a multicenter randomized clinical trial of delayed versus immediate pushing among term nulliparous women in labor with neuraxial analgesia conducted in the United States. Intrapartum characteristics were extracted from the medical charts. The primary outcome was perineal laceration, defined as second degree or above, characterized at delivery in women participating in longer term pelvic floor assessments post-delivery. Multivariable logistic regression was used to refine risk estimates while adjusting for randomization group, birth weight, and maternal age.

Results: Among the 941 women participating in the pelvic floor follow-up, 40.6% experienced a perineal laceration. No first stage labor characteristics were associated with perineal laceration, including type of labor or length of first stage. Receiving an amnioinfusion appeared protective of perineal laceration (adjusted odds ratio, 0.48; 95% confidence interval 0.26-0.91; P = 0.01). Second stage labor characteristics associated with injury were length of stage (2.01 h vs. 1.50 h; adjusted odds ratio, 1.36; 95% confidence interval 1.18-1.57; P < 0.01) and a prolonged second stage (adjusted odds ratio, 1.64; 95% confidence interval 1.06-2.56; P < 0.01). Operative vaginal delivery was strongly associated with perineal laceration (adjusted odds ratio, 3.57; 95% confidence interval 1.85-6.90; P < 0.01).

Conclusion: Operative vaginal delivery is a modifiable risk factor associated with an increased risk of perineal laceration. Amnioinfusion appeared protective against injury, which could reflect a spurious finding, but may also represent true risk reduction similar to the mechanism of warm perineal compress.

与会阴撕裂相关的第一和第二阶段风险因素
目的确定与分娩时会阴裂伤有关的产期因素:这是对在美国进行的一项多中心随机临床试验进行的二次分析,该试验针对使用神经镇痛的足月无痛分娩产妇进行延迟用力与立即用力的比较。从病历中提取了产中特征。主要结果是参加产后盆底长期评估的产妇在分娩时出现的会阴裂伤(定义为二度或二度以上)。在调整随机分组、出生体重和产妇年龄的同时,采用多变量逻辑回归来完善风险估计值:结果:在参与盆底随访的941名产妇中,40.6%的产妇出现会阴裂伤。第一产程的特征与会阴裂伤无关,包括分娩类型或第一产程的长度。接受羊膜腔注射似乎对会阴裂伤有保护作用(调整后的几率比为0.48;95%置信区间为0.26-0.91;P = 0.01)。与损伤相关的第二产程特征是产程长度(2.01 小时 vs. 1.50 小时;调整后的几率比为 1.36;95% 置信区间为 1.18-1.57;P 结论:手术阴道分娩是一个可改变的风险因素,与会阴裂伤风险增加有关。无痛分娩似乎对损伤有保护作用,这可能是一个虚假的发现,但也可能与会阴部热敷的机制类似,真正降低了风险。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Maternal and Child Health Journal
Maternal and Child Health Journal PUBLIC, ENVIRONMENTAL & OCCUPATIONAL HEALTH-
CiteScore
3.20
自引率
4.30%
发文量
271
期刊介绍: Maternal and Child Health Journal is the first exclusive forum to advance the scientific and professional knowledge base of the maternal and child health (MCH) field. This bimonthly provides peer-reviewed papers addressing the following areas of MCH practice, policy, and research: MCH epidemiology, demography, and health status assessment Innovative MCH service initiatives Implementation of MCH programs MCH policy analysis and advocacy MCH professional development. Exploring the full spectrum of the MCH field, Maternal and Child Health Journal is an important tool for practitioners as well as academics in public health, obstetrics, gynecology, prenatal medicine, pediatrics, and neonatology. Sponsors include the Association of Maternal and Child Health Programs (AMCHP), the Association of Teachers of Maternal and Child Health (ATMCH), and CityMatCH.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信