Examining patterns suggestive of acquisition during functional analyses: A consecutive controlled series of 116 cases

IF 2.9 2区 心理学 Q1 PSYCHOLOGY, CLINICAL
Nathalie Fernandez, Michelle A. Frank-Crawford, Courtney Hanlin, Ryan Benson, John M. Falligant, Iser G. DeLeon
{"title":"Examining patterns suggestive of acquisition during functional analyses: A consecutive controlled series of 116 cases","authors":"Nathalie Fernandez,&nbsp;Michelle A. Frank-Crawford,&nbsp;Courtney Hanlin,&nbsp;Ryan Benson,&nbsp;John M. Falligant,&nbsp;Iser G. DeLeon","doi":"10.1002/jaba.1068","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p>The functional analysis approach described by Iwata et al. (1982/1994) has been used widely to determine the variables evoking and maintaining challenging behavior. However, one potential concern with conducting functional analyses is that repeated exposure to contingencies may induce a novel functional relation. To examine the likelihood of these potential iatrogenic effects, we evaluated social test conditions of the functional analysis for 116 participants and searched for patterns of responding indicative of acquisition. Patterns suggestive of acquisition occurred in 13.70% of tangible reinforcement conditions; however, the prevalence was only slightly lower in the attention condition (8.75%). Much lower prevalence was observed for the escape condition (2.13%). When grouped by quotient score, a pattern of acquisition was just as likely to be observed in the attention condition as in the tangible condition. Additionally, patterns indicative of acquisition were no more likely to be observed with participants who emitted automatically reinforced challenging behavior.</p>","PeriodicalId":14983,"journal":{"name":"Journal of applied behavior analysis","volume":"57 2","pages":"426-443"},"PeriodicalIF":2.9000,"publicationDate":"2024-03-04","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of applied behavior analysis","FirstCategoryId":"102","ListUrlMain":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1002/jaba.1068","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"心理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"PSYCHOLOGY, CLINICAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

The functional analysis approach described by Iwata et al. (1982/1994) has been used widely to determine the variables evoking and maintaining challenging behavior. However, one potential concern with conducting functional analyses is that repeated exposure to contingencies may induce a novel functional relation. To examine the likelihood of these potential iatrogenic effects, we evaluated social test conditions of the functional analysis for 116 participants and searched for patterns of responding indicative of acquisition. Patterns suggestive of acquisition occurred in 13.70% of tangible reinforcement conditions; however, the prevalence was only slightly lower in the attention condition (8.75%). Much lower prevalence was observed for the escape condition (2.13%). When grouped by quotient score, a pattern of acquisition was just as likely to be observed in the attention condition as in the tangible condition. Additionally, patterns indicative of acquisition were no more likely to be observed with participants who emitted automatically reinforced challenging behavior.

在功能分析过程中检查提示获得的模式:116 例连续对照系列。
岩田等人(1982/1994)描述的功能分析方法已被广泛用于确定诱发和维持挑战性行为的变量。然而,进行功能分析的一个潜在顾虑是,反复接触或然条件可能会诱发一种新的功能关系。为了研究这些潜在先天效应的可能性,我们对 116 名参与者进行了功能分析的社会测试条件评估,并寻找表明习得的反应模式。在 13.70% 的有形强化条件中出现了暗示习得的模式;然而,在注意条件中的发生率略低(8.75%)。逃跑条件下的发生率要低得多(2.13%)。如果按商数得分分组,在注意力条件下和在有形条件下同样有可能观察到习得模式。此外,在自动强化挑战行为的参与者身上,也没有观察到更多的习得模式。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Journal of applied behavior analysis
Journal of applied behavior analysis PSYCHOLOGY, CLINICAL-
CiteScore
5.80
自引率
20.70%
发文量
61
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信