Social protection for refugees and migrants: Examining access to benefits and labour market interventions

IF 1.2 Q3 PUBLIC ADMINISTRATION
Karin Seyfert, Héctor Alonso
{"title":"Social protection for refugees and migrants: Examining access to benefits and labour market interventions","authors":"Karin Seyfert, Héctor Alonso","doi":"10.1111/issr.12347","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The article discusses the current practices for providing social protection to refugees and migrants, focusing primarily on low‐ and middle‐income (LMICs) destination countries. It examines formal providers of social protection, including state institutions, development agencies and humanitarian organizations. In recent years, there has been an increase in funding from multilateral donors, especially in the context of the COVID–19 pandemic, leading to the establishment of national assistance programmes in LMICs that also encompass refugees and to a lesser extent migrant workers. International agencies play a crucial role in providing humanitarian cash assistance to refugees, given their status under international protection under the 1951 Refugee Convention and related protocols. Access to social insurance remains tied to formal employment. Social insurance entitlements for migrants are often restricted and refugees are typically excluded from formal employment in LMICs. Regarding labour market interventions, refugees and migrants are often excluded from national programmes, with migrants’ residence permits being often tied to employment. For refugees, international agencies take a prominent role in providing livelihood programmes aimed at enhancing income‐generating opportunities, economic inclusion and financial independence. However, the effectiveness of these interventions remains unclear, lacking rigorous evidence, and often being short‐term with limited coverage.","PeriodicalId":44996,"journal":{"name":"International Social Security Review","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":1.2000,"publicationDate":"2024-02-27","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"International Social Security Review","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1111/issr.12347","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"PUBLIC ADMINISTRATION","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

The article discusses the current practices for providing social protection to refugees and migrants, focusing primarily on low‐ and middle‐income (LMICs) destination countries. It examines formal providers of social protection, including state institutions, development agencies and humanitarian organizations. In recent years, there has been an increase in funding from multilateral donors, especially in the context of the COVID–19 pandemic, leading to the establishment of national assistance programmes in LMICs that also encompass refugees and to a lesser extent migrant workers. International agencies play a crucial role in providing humanitarian cash assistance to refugees, given their status under international protection under the 1951 Refugee Convention and related protocols. Access to social insurance remains tied to formal employment. Social insurance entitlements for migrants are often restricted and refugees are typically excluded from formal employment in LMICs. Regarding labour market interventions, refugees and migrants are often excluded from national programmes, with migrants’ residence permits being often tied to employment. For refugees, international agencies take a prominent role in providing livelihood programmes aimed at enhancing income‐generating opportunities, economic inclusion and financial independence. However, the effectiveness of these interventions remains unclear, lacking rigorous evidence, and often being short‐term with limited coverage.
难民和移民的社会保护:审查获得福利的机会和劳动力市场干预措施
文章讨论了为难民和移民提供社会保护的现行做法,主要侧重于中低收入(LMICs)目的地国家。文章探讨了社会保护的正式提供者,包括国家机构、发展机构和人道主义组织。近年来,多边捐助方提供的资金有所增加,尤其是在 COVID-19 大流行的背景下,这促使低收入和中等收入国家制定了国家援助计划,其中也包括难民,其次是移民工人。国际机构在向难民提供人道主义现金援助方面发挥着至关重要的作用,因为根据 1951 年《难民公约》及相关议定书,难民享有国际保护。获得社会保险仍然与正规就业挂钩。在低收入和中等收入国家,移民的社会保险权利往往受到限制,难民通常被排除在正规就业之外。在劳动力市场干预方面,难民和移民往往被排除在国家方案之外,移民的居留许可往往与就业挂钩。对于难民,国际机构在提供旨在增加创收机会、经济包容和经济独立的生计方案方面发挥着突出作用。然而,这些干预措施的有效性仍不明确,缺乏严格的证据,而且往往是短期的,覆盖面有限。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
International Social Security Review
International Social Security Review PUBLIC ADMINISTRATION-
CiteScore
2.00
自引率
8.30%
发文量
29
期刊介绍: The International Social Security Review, the world"s major international quarterly publication in the field of social security. First published in 1948, the journal appears in four language editions (English, French, German and Spanish). Articles by leading social security experts around the world present international comparisons and in-depth discussions of topical questions as well as studies of social security systems in different countries, and there is a regular, comprehensive round-up of the latest publications in its field.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信