Trends in AAA Repair in Australia Over Twenty Years.

IF 2.6 Q2 PERIPHERAL VASCULAR DISEASE
Vascular Health and Risk Management Pub Date : 2024-02-28 eCollection Date: 2024-01-01 DOI:10.2147/VHRM.S449375
Lakmali Anthony, Madeline Gillies, David Goh
{"title":"Trends in AAA Repair in Australia Over Twenty Years.","authors":"Lakmali Anthony, Madeline Gillies, David Goh","doi":"10.2147/VHRM.S449375","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>The advent of endovascular techniques has revolutionised the treatment of abdominal aortic aneurysms (AAA). Many countries have seen a transition from open AAA repair (OAR) to endovascular AAA repair (EVAR) over the past 25 years. The only study done in Australia that describes this change was done in the private sector. Majority of healthcare in Australia is delivered through the public, universal healthcare system. The aim of this study was to evaluate the trends in AAA repair in the Australian public sector over the past two decades.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>The Australian Institute of Health and Welfare (AIHW) Procedures Data Cubes from the National Hospitals Data Collection was used to extract data pertaining to AAA repairs from 2000 to 2021. Population data from the Australian Bureau of Statistics was used to calculate incidence of each type of repair per 100,000 population.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>There were 65,529 AAA repairs performed in the Australian public sector from 2000 to 2021. EVARs accounted for 64.4% (42,205) and OARs accounted for 35.6% (23, 324) of them. EVAR surpassed OAR as the preferred method of AAA repair in 2006. This trend was observed in both males and females and across all age groups.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>There was a consistent and steady transition from OAR to EVAR over the 21 year period with EVAR surpassing OAR as the preferred method of AAA repair relatively early in Australia compared to other countries. Further research that investigates medium- and long-term outcomes of newer stent grafts is needed to further ascertain the continued viability and effectiveness of this trend in AAA treatment.</p>","PeriodicalId":23597,"journal":{"name":"Vascular Health and Risk Management","volume":"20 ","pages":"69-75"},"PeriodicalIF":2.6000,"publicationDate":"2024-02-28","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10909325/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Vascular Health and Risk Management","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.2147/VHRM.S449375","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2024/1/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"PERIPHERAL VASCULAR DISEASE","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: The advent of endovascular techniques has revolutionised the treatment of abdominal aortic aneurysms (AAA). Many countries have seen a transition from open AAA repair (OAR) to endovascular AAA repair (EVAR) over the past 25 years. The only study done in Australia that describes this change was done in the private sector. Majority of healthcare in Australia is delivered through the public, universal healthcare system. The aim of this study was to evaluate the trends in AAA repair in the Australian public sector over the past two decades.

Methods: The Australian Institute of Health and Welfare (AIHW) Procedures Data Cubes from the National Hospitals Data Collection was used to extract data pertaining to AAA repairs from 2000 to 2021. Population data from the Australian Bureau of Statistics was used to calculate incidence of each type of repair per 100,000 population.

Results: There were 65,529 AAA repairs performed in the Australian public sector from 2000 to 2021. EVARs accounted for 64.4% (42,205) and OARs accounted for 35.6% (23, 324) of them. EVAR surpassed OAR as the preferred method of AAA repair in 2006. This trend was observed in both males and females and across all age groups.

Conclusion: There was a consistent and steady transition from OAR to EVAR over the 21 year period with EVAR surpassing OAR as the preferred method of AAA repair relatively early in Australia compared to other countries. Further research that investigates medium- and long-term outcomes of newer stent grafts is needed to further ascertain the continued viability and effectiveness of this trend in AAA treatment.

二十年来澳大利亚 AAA 的维修趋势。
背景:血管内技术的出现彻底改变了腹主动脉瘤(AAA)的治疗方法。在过去的 25 年中,许多国家已从开放式 AAA 修复术(OAR)过渡到血管内 AAA 修复术(EVAR)。澳大利亚唯一一项描述这种变化的研究是在私营部门进行的。澳大利亚的大部分医疗保健服务都是通过公共、全民医疗保健系统提供的。本研究旨在评估过去二十年来澳大利亚公共部门 AAA 修复的趋势:方法:使用澳大利亚卫生与福利研究所(AIHW)的全国医院数据收集程序数据立方体,提取2000年至2021年AAA修复的相关数据。澳大利亚统计局(Australian Bureau of Statistics)提供的人口数据被用来计算每10万人口中各类修复的发生率:结果:2000-2021年间,澳大利亚公共部门共进行了65529例AAA修复手术。其中EVAR占64.4%(42205例),OAR占35.6%(23324例)。2006年,EVAR超过OAR成为AAA修复的首选方法。这一趋势在所有年龄段的男性和女性中均可观察到:结论:与其他国家相比,在澳大利亚,EVAR较早地超越OAR成为AAA修复的首选方法。需要进一步研究新型支架移植物的中期和长期疗效,以进一步确定这种 AAA 治疗趋势的持续可行性和有效性。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Vascular Health and Risk Management
Vascular Health and Risk Management PERIPHERAL VASCULAR DISEASE-
CiteScore
4.20
自引率
3.40%
发文量
109
审稿时长
16 weeks
期刊介绍: An international, peer-reviewed journal of therapeutics and risk management, focusing on concise rapid reporting of clinical studies on the processes involved in the maintenance of vascular health; the monitoring, prevention, and treatment of vascular disease and its sequelae; and the involvement of metabolic disorders, particularly diabetes. In addition, the journal will also seek to define drug usage in terms of ultimate uptake and acceptance by the patient and healthcare professional.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信