To what extent do England's local offer websites adhere to the statutory guidance as set out in the special educational needs and disabilities code of practice?

IF 3 3区 教育学 Q1 EDUCATION & EDUCATIONAL RESEARCH
Jacob Matthews, Kristine Black-Hawkins, Arina Basu, Andreea-Ioana Necula, Jonny Downs, Tamsin Ford, Jennifer Saxton, the HOPE Study
{"title":"To what extent do England's local offer websites adhere to the statutory guidance as set out in the special educational needs and disabilities code of practice?","authors":"Jacob Matthews,&nbsp;Kristine Black-Hawkins,&nbsp;Arina Basu,&nbsp;Andreea-Ioana Necula,&nbsp;Jonny Downs,&nbsp;Tamsin Ford,&nbsp;Jennifer Saxton,&nbsp;the HOPE Study","doi":"10.1002/berj.3996","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p>In England the 2014 Children and Families Act introduced wide ranging changes to the assessment of and provision for children and young people with special educational needs and disabilities (SEND). Guidance underpinning implementation was then published in the Code of Practice. Our study focuses on a key component of that legislation, known as the ‘local offer’, which requires local authorities to establish and maintain, clear, comprehensive, accessible and up to date information for children and young people with SEND, and their families, about available SEND provision. Local authorities are expected to involve children and young people and their families in co-designing and reviewing their local offer, alongside other key stakeholders, to ensure provision is responsive to local needs and aspirations. To support our assessment of local offers we first established six categories based on the criteria in the Code of Practice about expected availability of SEND-related information (e.g. financial support, health service information, accessibility information). We used these categories to evaluate the relevant local offer websites of all 151 English local authorities with legal responsibilities for SEND assessment and provision. We further assessed whether each local offer website included three common website accessibility functions. Our findings demonstrate variation in the availability of information at local authority level, therefore limiting the ability of some young people and families to make informed decisions about the support available to them. This provides further evidence to support growing concerns about ‘postcode lottery’ inequities for families and their children with SEND.</p>","PeriodicalId":51410,"journal":{"name":"British Educational Research Journal","volume":"50 4","pages":"1724-1740"},"PeriodicalIF":3.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-02-28","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1002/berj.3996","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"British Educational Research Journal","FirstCategoryId":"95","ListUrlMain":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1002/berj.3996","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"教育学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"EDUCATION & EDUCATIONAL RESEARCH","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

In England the 2014 Children and Families Act introduced wide ranging changes to the assessment of and provision for children and young people with special educational needs and disabilities (SEND). Guidance underpinning implementation was then published in the Code of Practice. Our study focuses on a key component of that legislation, known as the ‘local offer’, which requires local authorities to establish and maintain, clear, comprehensive, accessible and up to date information for children and young people with SEND, and their families, about available SEND provision. Local authorities are expected to involve children and young people and their families in co-designing and reviewing their local offer, alongside other key stakeholders, to ensure provision is responsive to local needs and aspirations. To support our assessment of local offers we first established six categories based on the criteria in the Code of Practice about expected availability of SEND-related information (e.g. financial support, health service information, accessibility information). We used these categories to evaluate the relevant local offer websites of all 151 English local authorities with legal responsibilities for SEND assessment and provision. We further assessed whether each local offer website included three common website accessibility functions. Our findings demonstrate variation in the availability of information at local authority level, therefore limiting the ability of some young people and families to make informed decisions about the support available to them. This provides further evidence to support growing concerns about ‘postcode lottery’ inequities for families and their children with SEND.

Abstract Image

英格兰的地方教育网站在多大程度上遵守了《特殊教育需求与残疾守则》中规定的法定指南?
在英格兰,《2014 年儿童和家庭法案》对有特殊教育需求和残疾的儿童和青少年的评估和供给进行了广泛的改革。随后,在《实践准则》中发布了实施指南。我们的研究重点是该立法的一个关键组成部分,即 "地方提供",它要求地方当局为有特殊教育需要和残疾的儿童和青少年及其家庭建立并维护清晰、全面、无障碍和最新的信息,使其了解现有的特殊教育需要和残疾儿童和青少年服务。地方当局应与其他主要利益相关者一起,让儿童和青少年及其家庭参与共同设计和审查当地提供的服务,以确保提供的服务能够满足当地的需求和愿望。为了支持我们对当地提供的服务进行评估,我们首先根据《业务守则》中与特殊教育需要相关的信息(如经济支持、医疗服务信息、无障碍信息)的预期可用性标准确定了六个类别。我们使用这些类别来评估所有 151 个对特殊教育需要评估和提供负有法律责任的英格兰地方当局的相关本地提供网站。我们进一步评估了每个地方提供的网站是否包含三种常见的网站无障碍功能。我们的研究结果表明,地方当局在信息提供方面存在差异,因此限制了一些青少年和家庭就他们可获得的支持做出明智决定的能力。这进一步证明了人们日益关注的 "邮编抽签 "对有特殊教育需求的家庭及其子女造成的不平等。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
British Educational Research Journal
British Educational Research Journal EDUCATION & EDUCATIONAL RESEARCH-
CiteScore
4.70
自引率
8.70%
发文量
71
期刊介绍: The British Educational Research Journal is an international peer reviewed medium for the publication of articles of interest to researchers in education and has rapidly become a major focal point for the publication of educational research from throughout the world. For further information on the association please visit the British Educational Research Association web site. The journal is interdisciplinary in approach, and includes reports of case studies, experiments and surveys, discussions of conceptual and methodological issues and of underlying assumptions in educational research, accounts of research in progress, and book reviews.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信