Paleozoic Reef Formation in the Pechora Syneclise and the Caspian Basin: A Comparative Analysis

IF 0.7 4区 地球科学 Q4 GEOCHEMISTRY & GEOPHYSICS
V. G. Kuznetsov, L. M. Zhuravleva
{"title":"Paleozoic Reef Formation in the Pechora Syneclise and the Caspian Basin: A Comparative Analysis","authors":"V. G. Kuznetsov,&nbsp;L. M. Zhuravleva","doi":"10.1134/S0024490223700360","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p>In two marginal depressions of the East European Platform (Pechora Syneclise and Caspian Basin), reef structures are widespread, but their stratigraphic intervals are far from similar. The reef formation began in the Caradocian in the Pechorian Ural, in the second half of the Llandoverian in the Pechora Syneclise, reached the maximum in the Frasnian, and gave way to the development of reef mounds in the Famennian. The structures are represented both as asymmetric reefs framing shallow zones at their boundary with the relatively deep paleobasins and as solitary structures within the latter. Reefs of the next global maximums (late Visean–Serpukhovian and Lower Permian) are confined to some places at the boundary with the Ural paleocean and its relict (Cis-Ural foredeep). The Caspian Basin accommodates reefs of all three global maximums of development—both asymmetric reef systems framing the shelf edges and symmetric intra-basin isolated structures. Such difference is due to the different paleogeomorphological type of basins. The Caspian Basin was sharply differentiated in depth throughout the Middle and Late Paleozoic, resulting in the formation of reefs rising above the bottom of these basins. In the Pechora Syneclise, depth differentiation of the basins occurred only in the Late Devonian. The Visean–Serpukhovian and early Permian shallow seas were generally weakly dissected and did not provide conditions for the formation of thick reefs protruding above the seafloor. Such reefs were formed only on the Ural paleocean edge in the Visean–Serpukhovian and on the Cis-Ural foredeep edge in the Permian.</p>","PeriodicalId":18150,"journal":{"name":"Lithology and Mineral Resources","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.7000,"publicationDate":"2024-03-02","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Lithology and Mineral Resources","FirstCategoryId":"89","ListUrlMain":"https://link.springer.com/article/10.1134/S0024490223700360","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"地球科学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"GEOCHEMISTRY & GEOPHYSICS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

In two marginal depressions of the East European Platform (Pechora Syneclise and Caspian Basin), reef structures are widespread, but their stratigraphic intervals are far from similar. The reef formation began in the Caradocian in the Pechorian Ural, in the second half of the Llandoverian in the Pechora Syneclise, reached the maximum in the Frasnian, and gave way to the development of reef mounds in the Famennian. The structures are represented both as asymmetric reefs framing shallow zones at their boundary with the relatively deep paleobasins and as solitary structures within the latter. Reefs of the next global maximums (late Visean–Serpukhovian and Lower Permian) are confined to some places at the boundary with the Ural paleocean and its relict (Cis-Ural foredeep). The Caspian Basin accommodates reefs of all three global maximums of development—both asymmetric reef systems framing the shelf edges and symmetric intra-basin isolated structures. Such difference is due to the different paleogeomorphological type of basins. The Caspian Basin was sharply differentiated in depth throughout the Middle and Late Paleozoic, resulting in the formation of reefs rising above the bottom of these basins. In the Pechora Syneclise, depth differentiation of the basins occurred only in the Late Devonian. The Visean–Serpukhovian and early Permian shallow seas were generally weakly dissected and did not provide conditions for the formation of thick reefs protruding above the seafloor. Such reefs were formed only on the Ural paleocean edge in the Visean–Serpukhovian and on the Cis-Ural foredeep edge in the Permian.

Abstract Image

Abstract Image

佩乔拉群落和里海盆地的古生代岩礁形成:对比分析
摘要 在东欧地台的两个边缘洼地(佩科拉同步带和里海盆地)中,礁石结构十分普遍,但它们的地层间隔却远不相似。礁石的形成始于佩乔拉乌拉尔卡拉多克纪,佩乔拉群的形成始于兰多瓦纪后半期,在弗拉斯年达到顶峰,并在法门年让位于礁丘的发展。这些结构既表现为在与相对较深的古盆地交界处的浅滩上形成不对称的礁框,也表现为古盆地内的孤立结构。下一个全球最大值(晚维西期-瑟普霍夫期和下二叠统)的礁石仅限于与乌拉尔古海洋及其遗迹(顺乌拉尔前深)交界的一些地方。里海盆地容纳了所有三种全球最大发育程度的礁石--既有构成陆架边缘的非对称礁石系统,也有盆地内对称的孤立结构。这种差异是由于盆地的古地貌类型不同造成的。里海盆地在整个中、晚古生代深度分化明显,导致礁石形成,高出盆地底部。在佩乔拉群,盆地的深度分异只发生在晚泥盆世。维谢安-塞普霍维亚和二叠纪早期的浅海一般分隔较弱,不具备形成凸出海底的厚珊瑚礁的条件。只有在维谢安-塞普霍夫期的乌拉尔古海洋边缘和二叠纪的顺乌拉尔前深边缘才形成了这种珊瑚礁。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Lithology and Mineral Resources
Lithology and Mineral Resources 地学-地球化学与地球物理
CiteScore
1.30
自引率
37.50%
发文量
29
审稿时长
>12 weeks
期刊介绍: Lithology and Mineral Resources is an international peer reviewed journal that publishes articles on a wide range of problems related to the formation of sedimentary rocks and ores. Special attention is given to comparison of ancient sedimentary rock and ore formation with present-day processes. The major part of the journal is devoted to comparative analysis of sedimentary processes on the continents and in oceans, as well as the genetic aspects of the formation of sedimentary and hydrothermal–sedimentary mineral resources. The journal welcomes manuscripts from all countries in the English or Russian language.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信