Bilingualism reduces associations between cognition and the brain at baseline, but does not show evidence of cognitive reserve over time

IF 2.5 1区 文学 Q1 LINGUISTICS
Meghan R. Elliott, Dan M Mungas, Miguel Arce Rentería, Rachel A. Whitmer, Charles DeCarli, Evan M Fletcher
{"title":"Bilingualism reduces associations between cognition and the brain at baseline, but does not show evidence of cognitive reserve over time","authors":"Meghan R. Elliott, Dan M Mungas, Miguel Arce Rentería, Rachel A. Whitmer, Charles DeCarli, Evan M Fletcher","doi":"10.1017/s1366728924000105","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Studies suggest that bilingualism may be associated with better cognition, but the role of active bilingualism, the daily use of two languages, on cognitive trajectories remains unclear. One hypothesis is that frequent language switching may protect cognitive trajectories against effects of brain atrophy. Here, we examined interaction effects between language and brain variables on cognition among Hispanic participants at baseline (N = 153) and longitudinally (N = 84). Linguistic measures included self-reported active Spanish–English bilingualism or Spanish monolingualism. Brain measures included, at baseline, regions of gray matter (GM) thickness strongly correlated with cross-sectional episodic memory and executive function and longitudinally, tissue atrophy rates correlated with episodic memory and executive function change. Active Spanish–English bilinguals showed reduced association strength between cognition and gray matter thickness cross-sectionally, <jats:italic>β</jats:italic>=0.303, p &lt; .01 but not longitudinally, <jats:italic>β</jats:italic>=0.024, p = 0.105. Thus, active bilingualism may support episodic memory and executive function despite GM atrophy cross-sectionally, but not longitudinally.","PeriodicalId":8758,"journal":{"name":"Bilingualism: Language and Cognition","volume":"10 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.5000,"publicationDate":"2024-03-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Bilingualism: Language and Cognition","FirstCategoryId":"98","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1017/s1366728924000105","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"文学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"LINGUISTICS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Studies suggest that bilingualism may be associated with better cognition, but the role of active bilingualism, the daily use of two languages, on cognitive trajectories remains unclear. One hypothesis is that frequent language switching may protect cognitive trajectories against effects of brain atrophy. Here, we examined interaction effects between language and brain variables on cognition among Hispanic participants at baseline (N = 153) and longitudinally (N = 84). Linguistic measures included self-reported active Spanish–English bilingualism or Spanish monolingualism. Brain measures included, at baseline, regions of gray matter (GM) thickness strongly correlated with cross-sectional episodic memory and executive function and longitudinally, tissue atrophy rates correlated with episodic memory and executive function change. Active Spanish–English bilinguals showed reduced association strength between cognition and gray matter thickness cross-sectionally, β=0.303, p < .01 but not longitudinally, β=0.024, p = 0.105. Thus, active bilingualism may support episodic memory and executive function despite GM atrophy cross-sectionally, but not longitudinally.
双语会降低基线认知与大脑之间的联系,但随着时间的推移并不会显示出认知储备的证据
研究表明,双语可能与认知能力的提高有关,但积极的双语(日常使用两种语言)对认知轨迹的作用仍不清楚。一种假设是,频繁的语言转换可以保护认知轨迹免受脑萎缩的影响。在此,我们研究了基线(153 人)和纵向(84 人)语言和大脑变量对西班牙裔参与者认知能力的交互作用。语言测量包括自我报告的西班牙语-英语双语或西班牙语单语。大脑测量包括基线灰质(GM)厚度与横断面记忆和执行功能密切相关的区域,以及纵向组织萎缩率与记忆和执行功能变化相关的区域。活跃的西班牙语-英语双语者的认知能力与灰质厚度之间的横截面关联强度降低,β=0.303,p < .01,但纵向关联强度没有降低,β=0.024,p = 0.105。因此,积极的双语能力可能会支持外显记忆和执行功能,尽管基因组横向萎缩,但纵向萎缩不明显。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
8.90
自引率
16.70%
发文量
86
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信