{"title":"Protected Areas and the Environmental Kuznets Curve in European countries","authors":"Salvatore Bimonte , Arsenio Stabile","doi":"10.1016/j.forpol.2024.103186","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><p>Protected areas are a natural instrument for preserving biodiversity and a major defence against climate change. This paper uses an Environmental Kuznets Curve (EKC) perspective to examine the relationship between the percentage of national territory under protection (PA%) and per capita GDP (GDPpc) in European countries. Building on the results of a previous study (Bimonte, 2002) that found a U-shaped relationship between GDPpc and PA%, it explores fate of this relationship two decades later, after two economic crises and a pandemic. It also investigates the effect of the European Union (EU) enlargement. In a dynamic perspective, it analyses the effect, if any, on national conservation policy. Due to the characteristics of the indicator chosen, which is stock-sensitive and subject to saturation effect, it verifies whether the relationship between income level and PA% is still an EKC, or whether a convergence in conservation policy has emerged and PA% is tending to a steady state. This is done by running regression models on the countries to test said EKC and <em>β</em>-convergence hypotheses. The results confute the persistence of an EKC and show a convergence in conservation policy in the last two decades, albeit with interesting differences between groups of countries, in particular latecomers as opposed to old member states of the EU. The results have important policy implications: when dealing with public or collective goods, or goods that produce externalities, centralised (federal) guidance is more effective than local and decentralised approaches (subsidiarity principle).</p></div>","PeriodicalId":12451,"journal":{"name":"Forest Policy and Economics","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":4.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-03-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S138993412400039X/pdfft?md5=91596cb6d4155e345608118d978c9de2&pid=1-s2.0-S138993412400039X-main.pdf","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Forest Policy and Economics","FirstCategoryId":"97","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S138993412400039X","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"农林科学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"ECONOMICS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Protected areas are a natural instrument for preserving biodiversity and a major defence against climate change. This paper uses an Environmental Kuznets Curve (EKC) perspective to examine the relationship between the percentage of national territory under protection (PA%) and per capita GDP (GDPpc) in European countries. Building on the results of a previous study (Bimonte, 2002) that found a U-shaped relationship between GDPpc and PA%, it explores fate of this relationship two decades later, after two economic crises and a pandemic. It also investigates the effect of the European Union (EU) enlargement. In a dynamic perspective, it analyses the effect, if any, on national conservation policy. Due to the characteristics of the indicator chosen, which is stock-sensitive and subject to saturation effect, it verifies whether the relationship between income level and PA% is still an EKC, or whether a convergence in conservation policy has emerged and PA% is tending to a steady state. This is done by running regression models on the countries to test said EKC and β-convergence hypotheses. The results confute the persistence of an EKC and show a convergence in conservation policy in the last two decades, albeit with interesting differences between groups of countries, in particular latecomers as opposed to old member states of the EU. The results have important policy implications: when dealing with public or collective goods, or goods that produce externalities, centralised (federal) guidance is more effective than local and decentralised approaches (subsidiarity principle).
期刊介绍:
Forest Policy and Economics is a leading scientific journal that publishes peer-reviewed policy and economics research relating to forests, forested landscapes, forest-related industries, and other forest-relevant land uses. It also welcomes contributions from other social sciences and humanities perspectives that make clear theoretical, conceptual and methodological contributions to the existing state-of-the-art literature on forests and related land use systems. These disciplines include, but are not limited to, sociology, anthropology, human geography, history, jurisprudence, planning, development studies, and psychology research on forests. Forest Policy and Economics is global in scope and publishes multiple article types of high scientific standard. Acceptance for publication is subject to a double-blind peer-review process.