Protected Areas and the Environmental Kuznets Curve in European countries

IF 4 2区 农林科学 Q1 ECONOMICS
Salvatore Bimonte , Arsenio Stabile
{"title":"Protected Areas and the Environmental Kuznets Curve in European countries","authors":"Salvatore Bimonte ,&nbsp;Arsenio Stabile","doi":"10.1016/j.forpol.2024.103186","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><p>Protected areas are a natural instrument for preserving biodiversity and a major defence against climate change. This paper uses an Environmental Kuznets Curve (EKC) perspective to examine the relationship between the percentage of national territory under protection (PA%) and per capita GDP (GDPpc) in European countries. Building on the results of a previous study (Bimonte, 2002) that found a U-shaped relationship between GDPpc and PA%, it explores fate of this relationship two decades later, after two economic crises and a pandemic. It also investigates the effect of the European Union (EU) enlargement. In a dynamic perspective, it analyses the effect, if any, on national conservation policy. Due to the characteristics of the indicator chosen, which is stock-sensitive and subject to saturation effect, it verifies whether the relationship between income level and PA% is still an EKC, or whether a convergence in conservation policy has emerged and PA% is tending to a steady state. This is done by running regression models on the countries to test said EKC and <em>β</em>-convergence hypotheses. The results confute the persistence of an EKC and show a convergence in conservation policy in the last two decades, albeit with interesting differences between groups of countries, in particular latecomers as opposed to old member states of the EU. The results have important policy implications: when dealing with public or collective goods, or goods that produce externalities, centralised (federal) guidance is more effective than local and decentralised approaches (subsidiarity principle).</p></div>","PeriodicalId":12451,"journal":{"name":"Forest Policy and Economics","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":4.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-03-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S138993412400039X/pdfft?md5=91596cb6d4155e345608118d978c9de2&pid=1-s2.0-S138993412400039X-main.pdf","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Forest Policy and Economics","FirstCategoryId":"97","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S138993412400039X","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"农林科学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"ECONOMICS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Protected areas are a natural instrument for preserving biodiversity and a major defence against climate change. This paper uses an Environmental Kuznets Curve (EKC) perspective to examine the relationship between the percentage of national territory under protection (PA%) and per capita GDP (GDPpc) in European countries. Building on the results of a previous study (Bimonte, 2002) that found a U-shaped relationship between GDPpc and PA%, it explores fate of this relationship two decades later, after two economic crises and a pandemic. It also investigates the effect of the European Union (EU) enlargement. In a dynamic perspective, it analyses the effect, if any, on national conservation policy. Due to the characteristics of the indicator chosen, which is stock-sensitive and subject to saturation effect, it verifies whether the relationship between income level and PA% is still an EKC, or whether a convergence in conservation policy has emerged and PA% is tending to a steady state. This is done by running regression models on the countries to test said EKC and β-convergence hypotheses. The results confute the persistence of an EKC and show a convergence in conservation policy in the last two decades, albeit with interesting differences between groups of countries, in particular latecomers as opposed to old member states of the EU. The results have important policy implications: when dealing with public or collective goods, or goods that produce externalities, centralised (federal) guidance is more effective than local and decentralised approaches (subsidiarity principle).

欧洲国家的保护区和环境库兹涅茨曲线
保护区是保护生物多样性的天然工具,也是抵御气候变化的重要手段。本文从环境库兹涅茨曲线(EKC)的角度研究了欧洲国家受保护领土的百分比(PA%)与人均 GDP(GDPpc)之间的关系。之前的一项研究(Bimonte,2002 年)发现 GDPpc 与 PA% 之间存在 U 型关系,在此基础上,本研究探讨了这种关系在二十年后,即两次经济危机和一次大流行病之后的命运。它还研究了欧盟(EU)扩大的影响。从动态角度分析了对国家保护政策的影响(如果有的话)。由于所选指标对存量敏感并受饱和效应的影响,本研究验证了收入水平与 PA% 之间的关系是否仍然是 EKC,或者保护政策是否出现了趋同,PA% 是否趋于稳定状态。具体做法是对各国运行回归模型,检验 EKC 和 β 趋同假设。结果证实了 EKC 的持续性,并表明在过去二十年中保护政策出现了趋同,尽管不同国家组之间存在有趣的差异,尤其是欧盟的后加入者与老成员国之间。这些结果具有重要的政策含义:在处理公共或集体物品或产生外部性的物品时,集中(联邦)指导比地方和分散方法(辅助原则)更有效。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Forest Policy and Economics
Forest Policy and Economics 农林科学-林学
CiteScore
9.00
自引率
7.50%
发文量
148
审稿时长
21.9 weeks
期刊介绍: Forest Policy and Economics is a leading scientific journal that publishes peer-reviewed policy and economics research relating to forests, forested landscapes, forest-related industries, and other forest-relevant land uses. It also welcomes contributions from other social sciences and humanities perspectives that make clear theoretical, conceptual and methodological contributions to the existing state-of-the-art literature on forests and related land use systems. These disciplines include, but are not limited to, sociology, anthropology, human geography, history, jurisprudence, planning, development studies, and psychology research on forests. Forest Policy and Economics is global in scope and publishes multiple article types of high scientific standard. Acceptance for publication is subject to a double-blind peer-review process.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信