Understanding visitor attitudes towards the timed-entry reservation system in Rocky Mountain National Park: Contemporary managed access as a social-ecological system
IF 3.6 3区 管理学Q1 HOSPITALITY, LEISURE, SPORT & TOURISM
Noah Creany , Christopher A. Monz , Scott M. Esser
{"title":"Understanding visitor attitudes towards the timed-entry reservation system in Rocky Mountain National Park: Contemporary managed access as a social-ecological system","authors":"Noah Creany , Christopher A. Monz , Scott M. Esser","doi":"10.1016/j.jort.2024.100736","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><p>Park and protected area (PPAs) management is often characterized by tightly interdependent social, ecological, and managerial dimensions that have increasingly been conceptualized as social-ecological systems (SES) to understand the complex interrelationships between these dimensions. Current trends of increasing visitation in U.S. National Parks have accentuated the complex interactions between the amount of recreation use, the quality of the visitor experience, ecological resource conditions, and the burden on management and the capacity of the setting. In order to manage visitor use in balance with desired social and ecological conditions and allocate opportunities for use in an equitable manner, several U.S. National Parks including Acadia (ME), Arches (UT), Glacier (MT), Rocky Mountain (CO), Shenandoah (VA), Yosemite (CA), and Zion (UT) are using advance-reservation or managed-access reservation systems. Rocky Mountain National Park (RMNP) implemented a Timed-Entry Reservation System (TEPS) which required visitors to place an online reservation for park access and allocated a fixed number of reservations per daily time period. RMNP managers employed the park's transportation system to target desired conditions and consequently moderate the flow of vehicles entering the park. We developed an email-based survey instrument to understand visitors' evaluations of their experience under the TEPS system and elicited their attitudes towards use-limiting strategies like TEPS. Our analysis found 78% of respondents reflected favorably on the TEPS managed-access park experience, although these attitudes are often value-laden and involve expectations about the conditions they experience. Our results provide a contemporary perspective on the assumptions in the rationing and allocation literature regarding the barriers and acceptability of these techniques for managing visitor use. Finally, we offer some insights and considerations from this analysis for managers considering similar managed-access strategies.</p></div><div><h3>Management implications</h3><p></p><ul><li><span>•</span><span><p>Conceptualizing a national park and associated managed-access process social-ecological systems illustrates connections between the visitor use and ecological dimensions of protected areas.</p></span></li><li><span>•</span><span><p>Managed-access reservations systems are a tool for management to balance recreation use alongside the resource conservation and management goals for the setting.</p></span></li><li><span>•</span><span><p>This research reveals that Rocky Mountain National Park visitors are generally supportive of managed-access strategies, particularly for the safety of their experience and the sustainable management of ecological resource conditions for future generations' enjoyment.</p></span></li></ul></div>","PeriodicalId":46931,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Outdoor Recreation and Tourism-Research Planning and Management","volume":"45 ","pages":"Article 100736"},"PeriodicalIF":3.6000,"publicationDate":"2024-03-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2213078024000045/pdfft?md5=2643175ee0eb12b5f4c1edeeb6e6dd68&pid=1-s2.0-S2213078024000045-main.pdf","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Outdoor Recreation and Tourism-Research Planning and Management","FirstCategoryId":"91","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2213078024000045","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"管理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"HOSPITALITY, LEISURE, SPORT & TOURISM","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Park and protected area (PPAs) management is often characterized by tightly interdependent social, ecological, and managerial dimensions that have increasingly been conceptualized as social-ecological systems (SES) to understand the complex interrelationships between these dimensions. Current trends of increasing visitation in U.S. National Parks have accentuated the complex interactions between the amount of recreation use, the quality of the visitor experience, ecological resource conditions, and the burden on management and the capacity of the setting. In order to manage visitor use in balance with desired social and ecological conditions and allocate opportunities for use in an equitable manner, several U.S. National Parks including Acadia (ME), Arches (UT), Glacier (MT), Rocky Mountain (CO), Shenandoah (VA), Yosemite (CA), and Zion (UT) are using advance-reservation or managed-access reservation systems. Rocky Mountain National Park (RMNP) implemented a Timed-Entry Reservation System (TEPS) which required visitors to place an online reservation for park access and allocated a fixed number of reservations per daily time period. RMNP managers employed the park's transportation system to target desired conditions and consequently moderate the flow of vehicles entering the park. We developed an email-based survey instrument to understand visitors' evaluations of their experience under the TEPS system and elicited their attitudes towards use-limiting strategies like TEPS. Our analysis found 78% of respondents reflected favorably on the TEPS managed-access park experience, although these attitudes are often value-laden and involve expectations about the conditions they experience. Our results provide a contemporary perspective on the assumptions in the rationing and allocation literature regarding the barriers and acceptability of these techniques for managing visitor use. Finally, we offer some insights and considerations from this analysis for managers considering similar managed-access strategies.
Management implications
•
Conceptualizing a national park and associated managed-access process social-ecological systems illustrates connections between the visitor use and ecological dimensions of protected areas.
•
Managed-access reservations systems are a tool for management to balance recreation use alongside the resource conservation and management goals for the setting.
•
This research reveals that Rocky Mountain National Park visitors are generally supportive of managed-access strategies, particularly for the safety of their experience and the sustainable management of ecological resource conditions for future generations' enjoyment.
期刊介绍:
Journal of Outdoor Recreation and Tourism offers a dedicated outlet for research relevant to social sciences and natural resources. The journal publishes peer reviewed original research on all aspects of outdoor recreation planning and management, covering the entire spectrum of settings from wilderness to urban outdoor recreation opportunities. It also focuses on new products and findings in nature based tourism and park management. JORT is an interdisciplinary and transdisciplinary journal, articles may focus on any aspect of theory, method, or concept of outdoor recreation research, planning or management, and interdisciplinary work is especially welcome, and may be of a theoretical and/or a case study nature. Depending on the topic of investigation, articles may be positioned within one academic discipline, or draw from several disciplines in an integrative manner, with overarching relevance to social sciences and natural resources. JORT is international in scope and attracts scholars from all reaches of the world to facilitate the exchange of ideas. As such, the journal enhances understanding of scientific knowledge, empirical results, and practitioners'' needs. Therefore in JORT each article is accompanied by an executive summary, written by the editors or authors, highlighting the planning and management relevant aspects of the article.