Comparative evaluation of rapid plasma reagin and ELISA with Treponema pallidum hemagglutination assay for the detection of syphilis in blood donors: a single center experience.
Brinda Kakkar, Joseph Philip, Rajeevinder Singh Mallhi
{"title":"Comparative evaluation of rapid plasma reagin and ELISA with Treponema pallidum hemagglutination assay for the detection of syphilis in blood donors: a single center experience.","authors":"Brinda Kakkar, Joseph Philip, Rajeevinder Singh Mallhi","doi":"10.1016/j.htct.2024.01.003","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Introduction: </strong>The prime responsibility of blood transfusion services in India is to provide safe blood. The donated blood is tested for human immunodeficiency virus (HIV), hepatitis B virus (HBV), hepatitis C virus (HCV), malaria and syphilis. In India, the screening of donated blood for syphilis is performed by rapid plasma reagin (RPR) or venereal disease research laboratory (VDRL), whereas the World Health Organization (WHO) recommends screening of syphilis in blood donors by enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay (ELISA). Therefore, the aim of this study was to evaluate the performance of RPR and ELISA with the Treponema pallidum hemagglutination assay (TPHA - the gold standard) for the detection of syphilis in blood donors.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>In this cross-sectional study, 1524 consecutive whole blood donors were screened from April to October 2022. All blood samples collected during the study period were tested by RPR, ELISA and the TPHA and the results obtained were compared.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The seroprevalence of syphilis in blood donors in this study was 0.06% by RPR and 0.72% by ELISA and TPHA. On considering ELISA and the TPHA as the gold standard, ELISA had comparable sensitivity (100%), a higher specificity (100% vs. 99.34%), a higher positive predictive value (PPV - 100% vs. 9.1%) and no biological false positive/false negative results (0 vs. 10 false negatives) when compared to RPR.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>ELISA performed better as a screening assay than RPR in the detection of syphilis in blood donors, which is in agreement with the WHO recommendations for syphilis testing in blood donors with low prevalence.</p>","PeriodicalId":94026,"journal":{"name":"Hematology, transfusion and cell therapy","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-02-19","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Hematology, transfusion and cell therapy","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1016/j.htct.2024.01.003","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Introduction: The prime responsibility of blood transfusion services in India is to provide safe blood. The donated blood is tested for human immunodeficiency virus (HIV), hepatitis B virus (HBV), hepatitis C virus (HCV), malaria and syphilis. In India, the screening of donated blood for syphilis is performed by rapid plasma reagin (RPR) or venereal disease research laboratory (VDRL), whereas the World Health Organization (WHO) recommends screening of syphilis in blood donors by enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay (ELISA). Therefore, the aim of this study was to evaluate the performance of RPR and ELISA with the Treponema pallidum hemagglutination assay (TPHA - the gold standard) for the detection of syphilis in blood donors.
Methods: In this cross-sectional study, 1524 consecutive whole blood donors were screened from April to October 2022. All blood samples collected during the study period were tested by RPR, ELISA and the TPHA and the results obtained were compared.
Results: The seroprevalence of syphilis in blood donors in this study was 0.06% by RPR and 0.72% by ELISA and TPHA. On considering ELISA and the TPHA as the gold standard, ELISA had comparable sensitivity (100%), a higher specificity (100% vs. 99.34%), a higher positive predictive value (PPV - 100% vs. 9.1%) and no biological false positive/false negative results (0 vs. 10 false negatives) when compared to RPR.
Conclusion: ELISA performed better as a screening assay than RPR in the detection of syphilis in blood donors, which is in agreement with the WHO recommendations for syphilis testing in blood donors with low prevalence.
求助内容：
应助结果提醒方式：
京公网安备 11010802042870号
