Networking trait resilience: Unifying fragmented trait resilience systems from an ecological systems theory perspective.

IF 5 1区 心理学 Q1 Psychology
John Maltby
{"title":"Networking trait resilience: Unifying fragmented trait resilience systems from an ecological systems theory perspective.","authors":"John Maltby","doi":"10.1111/jopy.12925","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>This study reconceptualized trait resilience, defining it as a network of systems; utilizing direct resilience assessments-engineering, ecological, adaptive capacity, social cohesion-and proxy resilience assessments-personality, cognitive, emotional, eudaimonia, and health.</p><p><strong>Background: </strong>The background of the study addresses the fragmented conceptualization of trait resilience by proposing a unifying network model based on ecological systems theory, illustrating the dynamic interplay of resilience factors across varying levels of disturbance.</p><p><strong>Method: </strong>In Study One, four USA or UK samples (total n = 2396) were used to depict the trait resilience network. Study Two (n = 1091) examined the relationship between the network and disturbance at two time-points, using mental health levels as a disturbance metric.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Study One found that adaptive capacity, and sometimes positive emotional processes, were central variables to the network. Study Two found that in lower disturbance groups, adaptive capacity remained important, while in higher disturbance groups, a broader set of variables became central to the network.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Study One suggests a Broaden-and-Build approach, where adaptive capacity is a foundational resilience capability, reciprocally associated with positive emotional mechanisms. Study Two suggests a new \"Dynamic Resilience Spectrum Theory,\" proposing that increased disturbances necessitate the use of a more diverse set of resilience traits.</p>","PeriodicalId":48421,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Personality","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":5.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-03-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Personality","FirstCategoryId":"102","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1111/jopy.12925","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"心理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"Psychology","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Objective: This study reconceptualized trait resilience, defining it as a network of systems; utilizing direct resilience assessments-engineering, ecological, adaptive capacity, social cohesion-and proxy resilience assessments-personality, cognitive, emotional, eudaimonia, and health.

Background: The background of the study addresses the fragmented conceptualization of trait resilience by proposing a unifying network model based on ecological systems theory, illustrating the dynamic interplay of resilience factors across varying levels of disturbance.

Method: In Study One, four USA or UK samples (total n = 2396) were used to depict the trait resilience network. Study Two (n = 1091) examined the relationship between the network and disturbance at two time-points, using mental health levels as a disturbance metric.

Results: Study One found that adaptive capacity, and sometimes positive emotional processes, were central variables to the network. Study Two found that in lower disturbance groups, adaptive capacity remained important, while in higher disturbance groups, a broader set of variables became central to the network.

Conclusions: Study One suggests a Broaden-and-Build approach, where adaptive capacity is a foundational resilience capability, reciprocally associated with positive emotional mechanisms. Study Two suggests a new "Dynamic Resilience Spectrum Theory," proposing that increased disturbances necessitate the use of a more diverse set of resilience traits.

特质复原力网络化:从生态系统论的角度统一零散的特质复原力系统。
研究目的本研究将特质复原力重新概念化,将其定义为一个系统网络;利用直接复原力评估(工程、生态、适应能力、社会凝聚力)和替代复原力评估(个性、认知、情感、幸福感和健康):研究背景:本研究以生态系统论为基础,提出了一个统一的网络模型,说明了在不同程度的干扰下各种复原力因素之间的动态相互作用,从而解决了特质复原力的概念化问题:研究一:利用四个美国或英国样本(总数 n = 2396)来描述特质复原力网络。研究二(n = 1091)使用心理健康水平作为干扰度量标准,在两个时间点考察了该网络与干扰之间的关系:研究一发现,适应能力,有时是积极的情绪过程,是网络的核心变量。研究二发现,在干扰程度较低的群体中,适应能力仍然很重要,而在干扰程度较高的群体中,一系列更广泛的变量成为网络的核心:结论:研究一提出了一种 "拓宽与建设 "方法,即适应能力是一种基础复原能力,与积极情绪机制相互关联。研究二提出了一种新的 "动态复原力光谱理论",认为干扰的增加需要使用更多样化的复原力特征。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Journal of Personality
Journal of Personality PSYCHOLOGY, SOCIAL-
CiteScore
9.60
自引率
6.00%
发文量
100
期刊介绍: Journal of Personality publishes scientific investigations in the field of personality. It focuses particularly on personality and behavior dynamics, personality development, and individual differences in the cognitive, affective, and interpersonal domains. The journal reflects and stimulates interest in the growth of new theoretical and methodological approaches in personality psychology.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信