Assessment of pre-extubating recurrent laryngeal nerve palsy using ultrasound in postoperative patients with esophageal cancer: a prospective observational study.

IF 2.8 3区 医学 Q2 ANESTHESIOLOGY
Journal of Anesthesia Pub Date : 2024-06-01 Epub Date: 2024-03-02 DOI:10.1007/s00540-024-03315-7
Tomomi Kaneko, Takao Kato, Yuki Shiko, Yohei Kawasaki, Kaoru Koyama
{"title":"Assessment of pre-extubating recurrent laryngeal nerve palsy using ultrasound in postoperative patients with esophageal cancer: a prospective observational study.","authors":"Tomomi Kaneko, Takao Kato, Yuki Shiko, Yohei Kawasaki, Kaoru Koyama","doi":"10.1007/s00540-024-03315-7","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Purpose: </strong>Ultrasound performed after extubation has been suggested to be useful for the diagnosis of recurrent laryngeal nerve (RLN) paralysis. However, the use of ultrasound for this purpose before extubation has not been examined. The aim of this study was to examine the versatility (interrater reliability) and usefulness of ultrasound for evaluating the movement of vocal cords before extubation.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>The subjects were 30 patients who underwent radical surgery for esophageal cancer from August 2020 to December 2021. An experienced examiner performed an ultrasound examination before and after elective extubation on the day after surgery to evaluate RLN paralysis and record videos. Bronchoscopy was then performed to make a definite diagnosis. Three anesthetists blinded to the diagnosis also evaluated the cases using the videos, and the versatility of the examination was determined using a kappa test.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The diagnostic accuracies of the examiner and three anesthetists were 76.7%, 50.0%, 53.3%, and 46.7%, respectively, and the kappa coefficients for the examiner with the anesthetists were 0.310, 0.502, and 0.169, respectively. The sensitivity, specificity, positive predictive value and negative predictive value for diagnosis of RLN paralysis by the examiner using ultrasound before extubation were 0.57, 0.95, 0.80, and 0.87, respectively.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>These results indicate a lack of versatility of the ultrasound examination based on the low kappa coefficients. However, with an experienced examiner, ultrasound can serve as a non-invasive examination that can be performed before extubation with high accuracy and specificity for diagnosis of postoperative RLN paralysis.</p>","PeriodicalId":14997,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Anesthesia","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":2.8000,"publicationDate":"2024-06-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11096227/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Anesthesia","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1007/s00540-024-03315-7","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2024/3/2 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"ANESTHESIOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Purpose: Ultrasound performed after extubation has been suggested to be useful for the diagnosis of recurrent laryngeal nerve (RLN) paralysis. However, the use of ultrasound for this purpose before extubation has not been examined. The aim of this study was to examine the versatility (interrater reliability) and usefulness of ultrasound for evaluating the movement of vocal cords before extubation.

Methods: The subjects were 30 patients who underwent radical surgery for esophageal cancer from August 2020 to December 2021. An experienced examiner performed an ultrasound examination before and after elective extubation on the day after surgery to evaluate RLN paralysis and record videos. Bronchoscopy was then performed to make a definite diagnosis. Three anesthetists blinded to the diagnosis also evaluated the cases using the videos, and the versatility of the examination was determined using a kappa test.

Results: The diagnostic accuracies of the examiner and three anesthetists were 76.7%, 50.0%, 53.3%, and 46.7%, respectively, and the kappa coefficients for the examiner with the anesthetists were 0.310, 0.502, and 0.169, respectively. The sensitivity, specificity, positive predictive value and negative predictive value for diagnosis of RLN paralysis by the examiner using ultrasound before extubation were 0.57, 0.95, 0.80, and 0.87, respectively.

Conclusion: These results indicate a lack of versatility of the ultrasound examination based on the low kappa coefficients. However, with an experienced examiner, ultrasound can serve as a non-invasive examination that can be performed before extubation with high accuracy and specificity for diagnosis of postoperative RLN paralysis.

Abstract Image

利用超声波评估食管癌术后患者拔管前的喉返神经麻痹:一项前瞻性观察研究。
目的:有人认为在拔管后进行超声检查有助于诊断喉返神经(RLN)麻痹。然而,在拔管前使用超声波诊断喉返神经麻痹的情况尚未得到研究。本研究的目的是检验超声波在评估拔管前声带运动方面的通用性(相互间可靠性)和实用性:研究对象为 2020 年 8 月至 2021 年 12 月期间接受食道癌根治术的 30 名患者。一名经验丰富的检查员在术后第二天择期拔管前后进行超声检查,评估声带麻痹情况并记录视频。然后进行支气管镜检查以明确诊断。三名对诊断结果视而不见的麻醉师也使用视频对病例进行了评估,并使用卡帕检验确定了检查的通用性:检查员和三位麻醉师的诊断准确率分别为 76.7%、50.0%、53.3% 和 46.7%,检查员与麻醉师的卡帕系数分别为 0.310、0.502 和 0.169。检查者在拔管前使用超声诊断 RLN 麻痹的敏感性、特异性、阳性预测值和阴性预测值分别为 0.57、0.95、0.80 和 0.87:这些结果表明,基于较低的卡帕系数,超声检查缺乏通用性。不过,如果检查者经验丰富,超声检查可作为一种无创检查,在拔管前进行,对术后 RLN 麻痹的诊断具有较高的准确性和特异性。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Journal of Anesthesia
Journal of Anesthesia 医学-麻醉学
CiteScore
5.30
自引率
7.10%
发文量
112
审稿时长
3-8 weeks
期刊介绍: The Journal of Anesthesia is the official journal of the Japanese Society of Anesthesiologists. This journal publishes original articles, review articles, special articles, clinical reports, short communications, letters to the editor, and book and multimedia reviews. The editors welcome the submission of manuscripts devoted to anesthesia and related topics from any country of the world. Membership in the Society is not a prerequisite. The Journal of Anesthesia (JA) welcomes case reports that show unique cases in perioperative medicine, intensive care, emergency medicine, and pain management.
文献相关原料
公司名称 产品信息 采购帮参考价格
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信