Microsurgical versus endovascular treatment of ethmoidal dural arteriovenous fistulas: systematic review and meta-analysis with a single-center case series

IF 4.3 3区 材料科学 Q1 ENGINEERING, ELECTRICAL & ELECTRONIC
Chandler N. Berke, Anant Naik, Neil Majmundar, Sean Munier, Raphia Rahman, Ahsan Sattar, Priyank Khandelwal, James K. Liu
{"title":"Microsurgical versus endovascular treatment of ethmoidal dural arteriovenous fistulas: systematic review and meta-analysis with a single-center case series","authors":"Chandler N. Berke, Anant Naik, Neil Majmundar, Sean Munier, Raphia Rahman, Ahsan Sattar, Priyank Khandelwal, James K. Liu","doi":"10.3171/2023.12.focus23801","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"OBJECTIVE\n<p>Ethmoidal dural arteriovenous fistulas (DAVFs) are often associated with cortical venous drainage (CVD) and a higher incidence of hemorrhage compared with DAVFs in other locations. They may be treated with open surgical disconnection or with endovascular treatment (EVT). In this systematic review and meta-analysis, the authors compare the outcomes of ethmoidal DAVFs treated with open microsurgery versus EVT and report four additional cases of ethmoidal DAVFs treated with open microsurgery in their institution.</p>\nMETHODS\n<p>A literature search of the PubMed and Scopus databases was conducted between December 2021 and May 2022 to identify relevant articles published between 1990 and 2021 using the PRISMA guidelines. References were reviewed and screened by two authors independently, and disagreements were resolved through consensus. Exclusion criteria included non–English-language studies, those with an incorrect study design, those reporting DAVFs in a nonethmoidal location, and studies whose outcomes were not stratified based on DAVF location. Inclusion criteria were any studies reporting on ethmoidal DAVFs treated by either microsurgery or EVT. A risk of bias assessment was performed using the Newcastle-Ottawa Scale. The authors performed a pooled proportional meta-analysis to compare patient outcomes.</p>\nRESULTS\n<p>Twenty studies were included for analysis. Of 224 patients, 142 were treated with surgery, while 103 were treated with EVT. Seventy percent (148/210) of the patients were symptomatic at presentation, with hemorrhage being the most common presentation (48%). CVD was present in 98% of patients and venous ectasia in 61%. The rates of complete DAVF obliteration with surgery and EVT were 89% and 70%, respectively (95% CI −30% to −10%, p &lt; 0.03). Twenty percent (21/103) of endovascularly treated fistulas required subsequent surgery. Procedure-related complications occurred in 10% of the surgical cases, compared with 13% of the EVT cases. The authors’ case series included 4 patients with ethmoidal DAVFs treated surgically with complete obliteration, without any postoperative complications.</p>\nCONCLUSIONS\n<p>The complete obliteration rates of ethmoidal DAVF appear to be higher and more definitive with microsurgical intervention than with EVT. While complication rates between the two procedures seem similar, patients treated with EVT may require further interventions for definitive treatment. The limitations of this study include its retrospective nature, the quality of studies included, and the continued evolving technologies of EVT. Future studies should focus on the association between venous drainage pattern and the proclivity toward venous ectasia or rate of hemorrhage at presentation.</p>","PeriodicalId":3,"journal":{"name":"ACS Applied Electronic Materials","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":4.3000,"publicationDate":"2024-03-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"ACS Applied Electronic Materials","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.3171/2023.12.focus23801","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"材料科学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"ENGINEERING, ELECTRICAL & ELECTRONIC","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

OBJECTIVE

Ethmoidal dural arteriovenous fistulas (DAVFs) are often associated with cortical venous drainage (CVD) and a higher incidence of hemorrhage compared with DAVFs in other locations. They may be treated with open surgical disconnection or with endovascular treatment (EVT). In this systematic review and meta-analysis, the authors compare the outcomes of ethmoidal DAVFs treated with open microsurgery versus EVT and report four additional cases of ethmoidal DAVFs treated with open microsurgery in their institution.

METHODS

A literature search of the PubMed and Scopus databases was conducted between December 2021 and May 2022 to identify relevant articles published between 1990 and 2021 using the PRISMA guidelines. References were reviewed and screened by two authors independently, and disagreements were resolved through consensus. Exclusion criteria included non–English-language studies, those with an incorrect study design, those reporting DAVFs in a nonethmoidal location, and studies whose outcomes were not stratified based on DAVF location. Inclusion criteria were any studies reporting on ethmoidal DAVFs treated by either microsurgery or EVT. A risk of bias assessment was performed using the Newcastle-Ottawa Scale. The authors performed a pooled proportional meta-analysis to compare patient outcomes.

RESULTS

Twenty studies were included for analysis. Of 224 patients, 142 were treated with surgery, while 103 were treated with EVT. Seventy percent (148/210) of the patients were symptomatic at presentation, with hemorrhage being the most common presentation (48%). CVD was present in 98% of patients and venous ectasia in 61%. The rates of complete DAVF obliteration with surgery and EVT were 89% and 70%, respectively (95% CI −30% to −10%, p < 0.03). Twenty percent (21/103) of endovascularly treated fistulas required subsequent surgery. Procedure-related complications occurred in 10% of the surgical cases, compared with 13% of the EVT cases. The authors’ case series included 4 patients with ethmoidal DAVFs treated surgically with complete obliteration, without any postoperative complications.

CONCLUSIONS

The complete obliteration rates of ethmoidal DAVF appear to be higher and more definitive with microsurgical intervention than with EVT. While complication rates between the two procedures seem similar, patients treated with EVT may require further interventions for definitive treatment. The limitations of this study include its retrospective nature, the quality of studies included, and the continued evolving technologies of EVT. Future studies should focus on the association between venous drainage pattern and the proclivity toward venous ectasia or rate of hemorrhage at presentation.

乙状硬脑膜动静脉瘘的显微手术治疗与血管内治疗:系统回顾和荟萃分析与单中心病例系列研究
目的峡部硬脑膜动静脉瘘(DAVF)通常伴有皮质静脉引流(CVD),与其他部位的 DAVF 相比,出血的发生率更高。可通过开放手术断开或血管内治疗(EVT)对其进行治疗。在这篇系统综述和荟萃分析中,作者比较了开放显微手术与 EVT 治疗乙状体 DAVFs 的结果,并报告了其所在机构采用开放显微手术治疗乙状体 DAVFs 的另外四例病例。方法在 2021 年 12 月至 2022 年 5 月期间,采用 PRISMA 指南对 PubMed 和 Scopus 数据库进行了文献检索,以确定 1990 年至 2021 年期间发表的相关文章。参考文献由两位作者独立审阅和筛选,如有分歧,则通过协商一致的方式解决。排除标准包括非英语研究、研究设计不正确的研究、报告了非乙状结肠位置的 DAVFs 的研究以及未根据 DAVF 位置对结果进行分层的研究。纳入标准为任何报告了通过显微手术或EVT治疗乙状体DAVF的研究。采用纽卡斯尔-渥太华量表对偏倚风险进行了评估。作者进行了汇总比例荟萃分析,以比较患者的治疗效果。在224名患者中,142人接受了手术治疗,103人接受了EVT治疗。70%的患者(148/210)在发病时有症状,出血是最常见的表现(48%)。98%的患者存在心血管疾病,61%的患者存在静脉异位。手术和EVT完全阻塞DAVF的比例分别为89%和70%(95% CI -30%至-10%,p <0.03)。在接受血管内治疗的瘘管中,20%(21/103)需要进行后续手术。10%的手术病例出现了与手术相关的并发症,而EVT病例的这一比例仅为13%。作者的病例系列包括 4 例经手术治疗的乙状体 DAVF 患者,他们的瘘管完全闭塞,术后未出现任何并发症。虽然两种手术的并发症发生率似乎相似,但接受EVT治疗的患者可能需要进一步干预才能获得最终治疗。本研究的局限性包括其回顾性、纳入研究的质量以及EVT技术的不断发展。未来的研究应关注静脉引流模式与静脉异位倾向或发病时出血率之间的关联。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
7.20
自引率
4.30%
发文量
567
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信