American Independent Inventors in an Era of Corporate R&D by Eric S. Hintz (review)

IF 0.8 3区 哲学 Q2 HISTORY & PHILOSOPHY OF SCIENCE
Alexander Donges
{"title":"American Independent Inventors in an Era of Corporate R&D by Eric S. Hintz (review)","authors":"Alexander Donges","doi":"10.1353/tech.2024.a920553","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p> <span>Reviewed by:</span> <ul> <li><!-- html_title --> <em>American Independent Inventors in an Era of Corporate R&amp;D</em> by Eric S. Hintz <!-- /html_title --></li> <li> Alexander Donges (bio) </li> </ul> <em>American Independent Inventors in an Era of Corporate R&amp;D</em> By Eric S. Hintz. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press, 2021. Pp. 368. <p>Since the late nineteenth century, corporate R&amp;D labs have become an increasingly important source of innovation in the United States. Yet independent inventors still accounted for the majority of all patented inventions until the 1930s, and despite representing a declining share, they delivered notable inventions throughout the twentieth century. In his book <em>American Independent Inventors in an Era of Corporate R&amp;D</em>, Eric S. Hintz delves into the fascinating world of independent inventors in the United States and explores their contributions amid the dominance of corporate R&amp;D. Through comprehensive research, Hintz sheds light on the challenges, successes, and impact of these inventors in shaping innovation and driving technological change.</p> <p>The fact that independent inventors accounted for a large share of patented inventions until the mid-twentieth century is well documented by economic historians. Building on this research, Hintz uses various cases to illustrate different commercialization strategies. He distinguishes between four types of inventors: first, inventor-entrepreneurs who founded their own companies to exploit patented inventions commercially; second, inventors who sold their patents to existing firms, which then could either use these patents to scale up production or to hold down potential competitors; third, inventors who joined long-run cooperations with existing firms based on license or consulting agreements; fourth, inventors who used mixed strategies. There was vigorous cooperation between independent inventors and large firms, some of which had their own R&amp;D labs. Thus, independent inventors and corporate R&amp;D were somehow complementary inputs for the generation of innovation.</p> <p>Hintz shows that independent inventors could profit from cooperation with large firms by leveraging resources and expertise to bring inventions <strong>[End Page 403]</strong> to the market, but there were also conflicts. There was no level playing field when large corporations infringed patents of independent inventors, given that the latter did not possess similar financial means to endure lengthy court cases. Hintz highlights how patents were used to circumvent antitrust laws and build up barriers to market entry, for example by the creation of patent pools as in the market for light bulbs.</p> <p>Throughout the book, Hintz explores the challenges faced by independent inventors in navigating complex legal and economic landscapes. Independent inventors often found themselves marginalized and facing numerous obstacles. In contrast to other professions, inventors were not successful in establishing durable and powerful lobby organizations. Consequently, attempts to lobby in favor of patent law reforms, strengthening the interest of independent inventors, ultimately failed.</p> <p>By presenting a wide range of profiles of inventors and their stories, the author captures the breadth and depth of the independent inventor landscape, also including the role of female and African American inventors. The latter groups were vastly underrepresented in the patent statistics, reflecting the effects of explicit and implicit discrimination, for example by restricted access to education and capital. Hintz shows that there were attempts to create organizations and networks that should have helped female and African American inventors overcome such barriers, but these initiatives were of limited success.</p> <p>When measured by the share of patents, the importance of independent inventors declined in the twentieth century. World War II fostered this development, since corporate R&amp;D labs profited from large-scale military research contracts, even though individual inventors still delivered important military inventions, as Hintz shows. During the era of the Cold War, the large corporations could maintain their dominance, but the late 1970s and 1980s marked a turning point. Japanese firms overtook their U.S. competitors in various markets, raising doubts about the superiority of corporate R&amp;D. Hintz argues that independent inventors have again become more important since this period. Examples are the well-known inventor-entrepreneurs who founded large tech companies such as Apple or Microsoft. Unfortunately, Hintz discusses the post-1945 period only cursorily. Since the large tech companies built up their own R&amp;D labs, it would be interesting to know more about their cooperation with independent inventors. Concerning the link between competition and innovation, it would also...</p> </p>","PeriodicalId":49446,"journal":{"name":"Technology and Culture","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.8000,"publicationDate":"2024-02-29","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Technology and Culture","FirstCategoryId":"98","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1353/tech.2024.a920553","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"哲学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"HISTORY & PHILOSOPHY OF SCIENCE","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Reviewed by:

  • American Independent Inventors in an Era of Corporate R&D by Eric S. Hintz
  • Alexander Donges (bio)
American Independent Inventors in an Era of Corporate R&D By Eric S. Hintz. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press, 2021. Pp. 368.

Since the late nineteenth century, corporate R&D labs have become an increasingly important source of innovation in the United States. Yet independent inventors still accounted for the majority of all patented inventions until the 1930s, and despite representing a declining share, they delivered notable inventions throughout the twentieth century. In his book American Independent Inventors in an Era of Corporate R&D, Eric S. Hintz delves into the fascinating world of independent inventors in the United States and explores their contributions amid the dominance of corporate R&D. Through comprehensive research, Hintz sheds light on the challenges, successes, and impact of these inventors in shaping innovation and driving technological change.

The fact that independent inventors accounted for a large share of patented inventions until the mid-twentieth century is well documented by economic historians. Building on this research, Hintz uses various cases to illustrate different commercialization strategies. He distinguishes between four types of inventors: first, inventor-entrepreneurs who founded their own companies to exploit patented inventions commercially; second, inventors who sold their patents to existing firms, which then could either use these patents to scale up production or to hold down potential competitors; third, inventors who joined long-run cooperations with existing firms based on license or consulting agreements; fourth, inventors who used mixed strategies. There was vigorous cooperation between independent inventors and large firms, some of which had their own R&D labs. Thus, independent inventors and corporate R&D were somehow complementary inputs for the generation of innovation.

Hintz shows that independent inventors could profit from cooperation with large firms by leveraging resources and expertise to bring inventions [End Page 403] to the market, but there were also conflicts. There was no level playing field when large corporations infringed patents of independent inventors, given that the latter did not possess similar financial means to endure lengthy court cases. Hintz highlights how patents were used to circumvent antitrust laws and build up barriers to market entry, for example by the creation of patent pools as in the market for light bulbs.

Throughout the book, Hintz explores the challenges faced by independent inventors in navigating complex legal and economic landscapes. Independent inventors often found themselves marginalized and facing numerous obstacles. In contrast to other professions, inventors were not successful in establishing durable and powerful lobby organizations. Consequently, attempts to lobby in favor of patent law reforms, strengthening the interest of independent inventors, ultimately failed.

By presenting a wide range of profiles of inventors and their stories, the author captures the breadth and depth of the independent inventor landscape, also including the role of female and African American inventors. The latter groups were vastly underrepresented in the patent statistics, reflecting the effects of explicit and implicit discrimination, for example by restricted access to education and capital. Hintz shows that there were attempts to create organizations and networks that should have helped female and African American inventors overcome such barriers, but these initiatives were of limited success.

When measured by the share of patents, the importance of independent inventors declined in the twentieth century. World War II fostered this development, since corporate R&D labs profited from large-scale military research contracts, even though individual inventors still delivered important military inventions, as Hintz shows. During the era of the Cold War, the large corporations could maintain their dominance, but the late 1970s and 1980s marked a turning point. Japanese firms overtook their U.S. competitors in various markets, raising doubts about the superiority of corporate R&D. Hintz argues that independent inventors have again become more important since this period. Examples are the well-known inventor-entrepreneurs who founded large tech companies such as Apple or Microsoft. Unfortunately, Hintz discusses the post-1945 period only cursorily. Since the large tech companies built up their own R&D labs, it would be interesting to know more about their cooperation with independent inventors. Concerning the link between competition and innovation, it would also...

公司研发时代的美国独立发明家》,埃里克-S-欣茨著(评论)
评论人:Alexander Donges 公司研发时代的美国独立发明家 Eric S. Hintz Alexander Donges (bio) 公司研发时代的美国独立发明家 Eric S. Hintz 著。马萨诸塞州剑桥市:麻省理工学院出版社,2021 年。页码368.自 19 世纪末以来,企业研发实验室已成为美国日益重要的创新源泉。然而,直到 20 世纪 30 年代,独立发明家仍占所有专利发明的绝大多数,尽管所占比例不断下降,但他们在整个 20 世纪都取得了引人注目的发明。在《企业研发时代的美国独立发明家》一书中,埃里克-S-欣茨深入研究了美国独立发明家的迷人世界,并探讨了他们在企业研发占主导地位的时代所做出的贡献。通过全面的研究,辛茨揭示了这些发明家在塑造创新和推动技术变革方面所面临的挑战、取得的成功以及产生的影响。直到 20 世纪中叶,独立发明家在专利发明中所占的比例一直很大,这一事实已被经济史学家充分证明。在这一研究的基础上,欣茨利用各种案例说明了不同的商业化战略。他区分了四种类型的发明人:第一种是发明企业家,他们成立自己的公司,对专利发明进行商业开发;第二种是发明人,他们将专利出售给现有企业,这些企业可以利用这些专利扩大生产规模,或者压制潜在的竞争对手;第三种是发明人,他们与现有企业根据许可或咨询协议进行长期合作;第四种是采用混合策略的发明人。独立发明人与大公司之间的合作十分活跃,其中一些公司拥有自己的研发实验室。因此,独立发明人和企业研发在某种程度上是创新产生的互补投入。欣茨表明,独立发明人可以通过与大公司合作,利用资源和专业知识将发明[第 403 页结束]推向市场,从而从中获利,但同时也存在冲突。当大公司侵犯独立发明家的专利时,由于后者不具备类似的财力,无法忍受漫长的法庭诉讼,因此不存在公平的竞争环境。欣茨强调了专利是如何被用来规避反托拉斯法和建立市场进入壁垒的,例如在灯泡市场中建立专利池。在全书中,欣茨探讨了独立发明家在驾驭复杂的法律和经济环境时所面临的挑战。独立发明家常常发现自己被边缘化,面临重重障碍。与其他行业相比,发明家无法成功建立持久而强大的游说组织。因此,试图游说支持专利法改革、加强独立发明人利益的努力最终以失败告终。作者通过对发明家及其故事的广泛介绍,捕捉到了独立发明家的广度和深度,还包括女性和非裔美国人发明家的作用。在专利统计数据中,非裔美国人和女性发明家的比例严重偏低,这反映了显性和隐性歧视的影响,例如在获得教育和资本方面的限制。欣茨指出,人们曾试图建立一些组织和网络来帮助女性和非裔美国人发明家克服这些障碍,但这些举措取得的成功有限。以专利比例衡量,独立发明家的重要性在 20 世纪有所下降。第二次世界大战促进了这一发展,因为公司研发实验室从大规模的军事研究合同中获利,尽管正如欣茨所展示的,个人发明家仍然提供了重要的军事发明。在冷战时期,大公司可以保持其主导地位,但 20 世纪 70 年代末和 80 年代标志着一个转折点。日本公司在各个市场上超越了美国竞争对手,使人们对企业研发的优势产生了怀疑。欣茨认为,自这一时期以来,独立发明人再次变得更加重要。创立了苹果或微软等大型科技公司的知名发明企业家就是一例。遗憾的是,欣茨对 1945 年之后的时期只是粗略地进行了讨论。由于大型科技公司都建立了自己的研发实验室,我们有兴趣了解更多它们与独立发明家合作的情况。关于竞争与创新之间的联系,我们也希望了解更多。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Technology and Culture
Technology and Culture 社会科学-科学史与科学哲学
CiteScore
0.60
自引率
14.30%
发文量
225
审稿时长
>12 weeks
期刊介绍: Technology and Culture, the preeminent journal of the history of technology, draws on scholarship in diverse disciplines to publish insightful pieces intended for general readers as well as specialists. Subscribers include scientists, engineers, anthropologists, sociologists, economists, museum curators, archivists, scholars, librarians, educators, historians, and many others. In addition to scholarly essays, each issue features 30-40 book reviews and reviews of new museum exhibitions. To illuminate important debates and draw attention to specific topics, the journal occasionally publishes thematic issues. Technology and Culture is the official journal of the Society for the History of Technology (SHOT).
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信