Evaluation of the Stability of Regenerant Oat Lines Developed from In Vitro Callus Cultures

V. Yu. Stupko, S. Yu. Lugovtsova
{"title":"Evaluation of the Stability of Regenerant Oat Lines Developed from In Vitro Callus Cultures","authors":"V. Yu. Stupko, S. Yu. Lugovtsova","doi":"10.3103/s1068367423080189","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<h3 data-test=\"abstract-sub-heading\">Abstract</h3><p>The study was carried out to compare the productivity and stability of regenerant lines of spring oat and their donor husky (Tubinsky st. (3 lines), Sayan (3), and Kazyr (1)) and naked (Tyumensky golozerny (3 lines) and Golets (2)) varieties. Field tests were carried out in the forest-steppe zone of the Krasnoyarsk krai on leached chernozem. Criteria used for the line stability evaluation were the following: superiority index <i>P</i><sub><i>i</i></sub> determining the degree of a sample deviation from the maximum yield in each of the environments (years); <i>S</i><sup>(1)</sup> index characterizing the predictability of a genotype response to growing conditions; <i>S</i><sup>(3)</sup> index, aimed at identifying highly productive and highly stable genotypes; and <i>NP</i><sup>(2)</sup> index, intended for selection of genotypes with the optimal productivity/stability ratio. The majority of regenerants showed the yield and 1000 kernel weight parameters to be close to the donor varieties. Only three lines of the Tubinsky variety surpassed the donor in terms of the average three-year productivity by 1.78 (SR6-Tub.), 2.45 (SR11-Tub.), and 2.95 (SR15-Tub.) t/ha. Note that the 1000-kernel weight in the SR6-Tub. and ZR4-Golets lines was lower than that of the original variety by 1.9 and 1.4 g, respectively. A 1000 kernel weight in the ZR15-Kazyr line in 2017 was inferior to that in the donor variety by 1.4 g. In terms of the yield stability indices <i>P</i><sub><i>i</i></sub> and <i>S</i><sup>(1)</sup>, the ranks of nine out of 12 studied lines exceeded that of initial donor varieties by 5.7 on average. The similar result was observed in four (<i>P</i><sub><i>i</i></sub> higher by 2.25 rank units) and eight (<i>S</i><sup>(1)</sup> higher by 6.6 rank units) regenerant lines. In relation to the <i>S</i><sup>(3)</sup> index, six out of twelve lines surpassed their donors by 7 rank units on average; in terms of the 1000 kernel weight, nine lines exceeded their donors by 5.3 rank units. The rank determined for the <i>NP</i><sup>(2)</sup> index exceeded that of donor varieties by 5.5 in four lines in terms of yield and by 6.2 in ten lines in terms of a 1000 kernel weight.</p>","PeriodicalId":21531,"journal":{"name":"Russian Agricultural Sciences","volume":"102 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-02-29","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Russian Agricultural Sciences","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.3103/s1068367423080189","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

The study was carried out to compare the productivity and stability of regenerant lines of spring oat and their donor husky (Tubinsky st. (3 lines), Sayan (3), and Kazyr (1)) and naked (Tyumensky golozerny (3 lines) and Golets (2)) varieties. Field tests were carried out in the forest-steppe zone of the Krasnoyarsk krai on leached chernozem. Criteria used for the line stability evaluation were the following: superiority index Pi determining the degree of a sample deviation from the maximum yield in each of the environments (years); S(1) index characterizing the predictability of a genotype response to growing conditions; S(3) index, aimed at identifying highly productive and highly stable genotypes; and NP(2) index, intended for selection of genotypes with the optimal productivity/stability ratio. The majority of regenerants showed the yield and 1000 kernel weight parameters to be close to the donor varieties. Only three lines of the Tubinsky variety surpassed the donor in terms of the average three-year productivity by 1.78 (SR6-Tub.), 2.45 (SR11-Tub.), and 2.95 (SR15-Tub.) t/ha. Note that the 1000-kernel weight in the SR6-Tub. and ZR4-Golets lines was lower than that of the original variety by 1.9 and 1.4 g, respectively. A 1000 kernel weight in the ZR15-Kazyr line in 2017 was inferior to that in the donor variety by 1.4 g. In terms of the yield stability indices Pi and S(1), the ranks of nine out of 12 studied lines exceeded that of initial donor varieties by 5.7 on average. The similar result was observed in four (Pi higher by 2.25 rank units) and eight (S(1) higher by 6.6 rank units) regenerant lines. In relation to the S(3) index, six out of twelve lines surpassed their donors by 7 rank units on average; in terms of the 1000 kernel weight, nine lines exceeded their donors by 5.3 rank units. The rank determined for the NP(2) index exceeded that of donor varieties by 5.5 in four lines in terms of yield and by 6.2 in ten lines in terms of a 1000 kernel weight.

Abstract Image

评估由体外胼胝培养物培育出的燕麦再生品系的稳定性
摘要 本研究旨在比较春燕麦再生品系及其供体哈士奇(Tubinsky st.(3 个品系)、Sayan(3 个)和 Kazyr(1 个))和裸燕麦(Tyumensky golozerny(3 个品系)和 Golets(2 个))品种的产量和稳定性。田间试验在克拉斯诺亚尔斯克边疆区的森林草原地带的沥滤 Chernozem 上进行。品系稳定性评价采用的标准如下:确定样本在每种环境(年份)中偏离最高产量程度的优势指数 Pi;表征基因型对生长条件反应可预测性的 S(1)指数;旨在确定高产和高度稳定基因型的 S(3)指数;以及旨在选择具有最佳产量/稳定性比率基因型的 NP(2)指数。大多数再生品种的产量和千粒重参数都接近供体品种。只有三个 Tubinsky 品种的品系在三年平均产量方面超过了供体品种,分别为 1.78 吨/公顷(SR6-Tub.)、2.45 吨/公顷(SR11-Tub.)和 2.95 吨/公顷(SR15-Tub.)。SR6-Tub. 和 ZR4-Golets 品系的千粒重分别比原品种低 1.9 克和 1.4 克。在产量稳定性指数 Pi 和 S(1)方面,12 个研究品系中有 9 个品系的排名比最初的供体品种平均高出 5.7。在 4 个再生品系(Pi 高出 2.25 个等级单位)和 8 个再生品系(S(1) 高出 6.6 个等级单位)中也观察到类似的结果。在 S(3)指数方面,12 个品系中有 6 个品系平均比供体高出 7 个等级单位;在千粒重方面,9 个品系比供体高出 5.3 个等级单位。在 NP(2)指数方面,4 个品系的产量比供体品种高出 5.5 个等级单位,10 个品系的千粒重比供体品种高出 6.2 个等级单位。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信