Sci-comm "behind the scenes": Gendered narratives of scientific outreach activities in the life sciences

Perry G Beasley-Hall, Pam Papadelos, Anne Hewitt, Kate D L Umbers, Michelle T Guzik
{"title":"Sci-comm \"behind the scenes\": Gendered narratives of scientific outreach activities in the life sciences","authors":"Perry G Beasley-Hall, Pam Papadelos, Anne Hewitt, Kate D L Umbers, Michelle T Guzik","doi":"10.1101/2024.02.28.582614","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Science communication, or sci-comm, is a broad term describing activities seeking to increase scientific literacy. Sci-comm has a positive impact on perceptions of science, public policy, public scientific literacy, and career choices of future scientists. Yet, sci-comm is often viewed as at odds with, or tangential, to academic achievement, as non-scientific, or as less worthy a time commitment compared to internal communication in academia. In Australia, scientific societies and organisations engage in a range of activities underpinned by communal, or so-called \"behind-the-scenes\", sci-comm work by individuals done almost exclusively on a voluntary basis. Given an apparent undervaluing of sci-comm work in academia, we established a pilot study to investigate who does this work, in what capacity, and why. A semi-structured online survey was administered to 88 Australian life sciences organisations for dissemination to their members, and 49 responses were received. Respondents were mostly women in early-career researcher positions at universities. Participants almost universally agreed that their sci-comm contributions to organisations were not beneficial to career progression. Some participants suggested that this perception might stem from it being perceived as feminised or categorised as \"care work\", potentially resulting in its undervaluation. However, most also cited a range of personal and professional benefits gained from the work, including giving back to the general public and scientific community, and developing skills relevant to translating scientific research. The majority of survey respondents indicated that they were likely to continue such work in the future. Gaining a deeper understanding of the motivations behind, and perceptions of, behind-the-scenes sci-comm work will aid in overcoming barriers that disproportionately affect women, and promote better acknowledgement and recognition of their contributions in the future.","PeriodicalId":501568,"journal":{"name":"bioRxiv - Scientific Communication and Education","volume":"34 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-02-29","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"bioRxiv - Scientific Communication and Education","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1101/2024.02.28.582614","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Science communication, or sci-comm, is a broad term describing activities seeking to increase scientific literacy. Sci-comm has a positive impact on perceptions of science, public policy, public scientific literacy, and career choices of future scientists. Yet, sci-comm is often viewed as at odds with, or tangential, to academic achievement, as non-scientific, or as less worthy a time commitment compared to internal communication in academia. In Australia, scientific societies and organisations engage in a range of activities underpinned by communal, or so-called "behind-the-scenes", sci-comm work by individuals done almost exclusively on a voluntary basis. Given an apparent undervaluing of sci-comm work in academia, we established a pilot study to investigate who does this work, in what capacity, and why. A semi-structured online survey was administered to 88 Australian life sciences organisations for dissemination to their members, and 49 responses were received. Respondents were mostly women in early-career researcher positions at universities. Participants almost universally agreed that their sci-comm contributions to organisations were not beneficial to career progression. Some participants suggested that this perception might stem from it being perceived as feminised or categorised as "care work", potentially resulting in its undervaluation. However, most also cited a range of personal and professional benefits gained from the work, including giving back to the general public and scientific community, and developing skills relevant to translating scientific research. The majority of survey respondents indicated that they were likely to continue such work in the future. Gaining a deeper understanding of the motivations behind, and perceptions of, behind-the-scenes sci-comm work will aid in overcoming barriers that disproportionately affect women, and promote better acknowledgement and recognition of their contributions in the future.
科学通讯 "幕后":生命科学领域科学推广活动的性别叙事
科学传播(Sci-comm)是一个广义的术语,用于描述旨在提高科学素养的活动。科学传播对科学认知、公共政策、公众科学素养以及未来科学家的职业选择都有积极影响。然而,科学通讯往往被视为与学术成就不相容,或与学术成就无关,被视为非科学的,或与学术界的内部交流相比不值得投入时间。在澳大利亚,科学协会和组织开展的一系列活动都是由个人自愿参与的社区性或所谓的 "幕后 "科技通讯工作支撑的。鉴于科学通讯工作在学术界的价值明显被低估,我们开展了一项试点研究,以调查谁在从事这项工作、以何种身份从事以及原因何在。我们向 88 家澳大利亚生命科学组织发放了一份半结构化在线调查问卷,以向其成员传播信息,共收到 49 份回复。受访者大多是在大学担任早期研究员职位的女性。参与者几乎普遍认为,她们为组织做出的科学通讯贡献无益于职业发展。一些参与者认为,这种看法可能是由于科学通讯被视为女性化或被归类为 "护理工作",从而可能导致其价值被低估。不过,大多数人也提到了从这项工作中获得的一系列个人和职业利益,包括回馈公众和科学界,以及发展与科研成果转化相关的技能。大多数调查对象表示,他们今后有可能继续从事此类工作。更深入地了解幕后科普工作的动机和对幕后科普工作的看法,将有助于克服对女性产生过大影响的障碍,并促使她们的贡献在未来得到更好的承认和认可。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信