Investigating the impacts of solid phase extraction on dissolved organic matter optical signatures and the pairing with high-resolution mass spectrometry data across a freshwater stream network

IF 2.1 3区 地球科学 Q2 LIMNOLOGY
J. Alan Roebuck Jr, Allison N. Myers-Pigg, Vanessa Garayburu-Caruso, James Stegen
{"title":"Investigating the impacts of solid phase extraction on dissolved organic matter optical signatures and the pairing with high-resolution mass spectrometry data across a freshwater stream network","authors":"J. Alan Roebuck Jr,&nbsp;Allison N. Myers-Pigg,&nbsp;Vanessa Garayburu-Caruso,&nbsp;James Stegen","doi":"10.1002/lom3.10603","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p>Advancing our understanding of dissolved organic matter (DOM) chemistry in aquatic systems necessitates the integration of data streams from multiple analytical platforms. Some measurements require pretreatment with solid phase extraction (SPE), while others are performed directly on whole water samples. Evidence has suggested that SPE will be biased against select DOM fractions, leading to concerns over the ability to establish data linkages across platforms with variable needs for SPE pretreatment, such as those from optical measurements and those that provide high-resolution molecular information. Here, we directly addressed this concern by assessing the impact of SPE on DOM optical properties through excitation–emission matrices with parallel factor analysis (PARAFAC) for 47 samples across a stream network within a single watershed reflective of variable DOM sources. PARAFAC data was further paired with molecular information obtained by Fourier transform ion cyclotron resonance mass spectrometry (FTICR-MS). A comparison of PARAFAC models first revealed no systematic qualitative differences in major components between whole water DOM and DOM isolated by SPE (SPE-DOM); however, quantitative biases against select components were observed. Further linkages with FTICR-MS data revealed that the molecular fingerprint associated with each PARAFAC component was consistent between the whole water DOM and SPE-DOM. Our results suggest that bulk scale linkages across these analytical platforms could be inferred irrespective of the observed quantitative biases resulting from SPE for samples within this example watershed. This work represents a key step toward the systematic evaluation of linkages between optical and high-resolution mass spectrometry datasets in freshwater lotic environments.</p>","PeriodicalId":18145,"journal":{"name":"Limnology and Oceanography: Methods","volume":"22 4","pages":"241-253"},"PeriodicalIF":2.1000,"publicationDate":"2024-02-28","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1002/lom3.10603","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Limnology and Oceanography: Methods","FirstCategoryId":"89","ListUrlMain":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1002/lom3.10603","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"地球科学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"LIMNOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Advancing our understanding of dissolved organic matter (DOM) chemistry in aquatic systems necessitates the integration of data streams from multiple analytical platforms. Some measurements require pretreatment with solid phase extraction (SPE), while others are performed directly on whole water samples. Evidence has suggested that SPE will be biased against select DOM fractions, leading to concerns over the ability to establish data linkages across platforms with variable needs for SPE pretreatment, such as those from optical measurements and those that provide high-resolution molecular information. Here, we directly addressed this concern by assessing the impact of SPE on DOM optical properties through excitation–emission matrices with parallel factor analysis (PARAFAC) for 47 samples across a stream network within a single watershed reflective of variable DOM sources. PARAFAC data was further paired with molecular information obtained by Fourier transform ion cyclotron resonance mass spectrometry (FTICR-MS). A comparison of PARAFAC models first revealed no systematic qualitative differences in major components between whole water DOM and DOM isolated by SPE (SPE-DOM); however, quantitative biases against select components were observed. Further linkages with FTICR-MS data revealed that the molecular fingerprint associated with each PARAFAC component was consistent between the whole water DOM and SPE-DOM. Our results suggest that bulk scale linkages across these analytical platforms could be inferred irrespective of the observed quantitative biases resulting from SPE for samples within this example watershed. This work represents a key step toward the systematic evaluation of linkages between optical and high-resolution mass spectrometry datasets in freshwater lotic environments.

Abstract Image

调查固相萃取对溶解有机物光学特征的影响以及与淡水溪流网络中高分辨率质谱数据的配对关系
要加深对水生系统中溶解有机物 (DOM) 化学性质的了解,就必须整合来自多个分析平台的数据流。有些测量需要使用固相萃取(SPE)进行预处理,而有些测量则直接在整个水样上进行。有证据表明,固相萃取会对特定的 DOM 部分产生偏差,从而导致人们担心能否在对固相萃取预处理有不同需求的平台(如光学测量平台和提供高分辨率分子信息的平台)之间建立数据联系。在此,我们直接解决了这一问题,通过激发-发射矩阵与并行因子分析(PARAFAC)评估了 SPE 对 DOM 光学特性的影响,这些样本来自单一流域内的 47 个溪流网络,反映了不同的 DOM 来源。PARAFAC 数据进一步与傅立叶变换离子回旋共振质谱法(FTICR-MS)获得的分子信息配对。首先对 PARAFAC 模型进行比较,发现全水 DOM 和通过 SPE 分离出来的 DOM(SPE-DOM)在主要成分上没有系统性的质量差异;但观察到对某些成分存在定量偏差。与 FTICR-MS 数据的进一步联系表明,与 PARAFAC 各组分相关的分子指纹在全水 DOM 和 SPE-DOM 之间是一致的。我们的研究结果表明,在该示例流域的样本中,无论 SPE 是否会导致观测到的定量偏差,都可以推断出这些分析平台之间的大尺度联系。这项工作为系统评估淡水地层环境中光学数据集与高分辨率质谱数据集之间的联系迈出了关键一步。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
4.80
自引率
3.70%
发文量
56
审稿时长
3 months
期刊介绍: Limnology and Oceanography: Methods (ISSN 1541-5856) is a companion to ASLO''s top-rated journal Limnology and Oceanography, and articles are held to the same high standards. In order to provide the most rapid publication consistent with high standards, Limnology and Oceanography: Methods appears in electronic format only, and the entire submission and review system is online. Articles are posted as soon as they are accepted and formatted for publication. Limnology and Oceanography: Methods will consider manuscripts whose primary focus is methodological, and that deal with problems in the aquatic sciences. Manuscripts may present new measurement equipment, techniques for analyzing observations or samples, methods for understanding and interpreting information, analyses of metadata to examine the effectiveness of approaches, invited and contributed reviews and syntheses, and techniques for communicating and teaching in the aquatic sciences.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信