Best practices on patient education materials in hip surgery based on learnings from major hip centers and societies

IF 1.4 4区 医学 Q3 ORTHOPEDICS
Ali Parsa, Omkar N Prabhavalkar, Sheema Saeed, Julio Nerys-Figueroa, Andrew Carbone, Benjamin G Domb
{"title":"Best practices on patient education materials in hip surgery based on learnings from major hip centers and societies","authors":"Ali Parsa, Omkar N Prabhavalkar, Sheema Saeed, Julio Nerys-Figueroa, Andrew Carbone, Benjamin G Domb","doi":"10.1093/jhps/hnae011","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Patient education is important as it gives patients a better understanding of the risks and benefits of medical and surgical interventions. Developing communication technologies have completely changed and enhanced patient access to medical information. The aim of this study was to evaluate available patient education materials (PEMs) regarding hip surgery on the websites of major hip societies and centers. The PEM from 11 selected leading hip centers and societies were evaluated with the following assessment tools: Flesch–Kincaid (FK) readability test, Flesch Reading Ease formula, Literature-Intelligence-Data-Analysis (LIDA) instrument and Discernibility Interpretability Sources Comprehensive Evidence Relevance Noticeable (DISCERN) tool. Videos were assessed using Patient Educational Video Assessment Tool (PEVAT). A total of 69 educational items, including 52 text articles (75.4%) and 17 videos (24.6%) were retrieved and evaluated. The median Interquartile Range (IQR) FK level of 52 text articles was 10.8 (2.2). The median (IQR) LIDA score of text articles by center was 45. According to the LIDA score, 60% of all website articles demonstrated high accessibility (LIDA score > 44). The median DISCERN score of text articles by center was 69. Overall, 52 (100%) of the text articles were deemed to be at ‘good’ quality rating or higher, and 23.2% (16 out of 69) of the articles had excellent quality. The mean PEVAT score for the 17 videos was 25 ± 1.9. Analysis of text and video articles from the 11 leading orthopedic surgery centers and societies demonstrated that by selecting a reliable source of information from main scientific societies and major centers in hip surgery, patients can find more accurate information regarding their hip conditions.","PeriodicalId":48583,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Hip Preservation Surgery","volume":"48 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":1.4000,"publicationDate":"2024-02-29","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Hip Preservation Surgery","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1093/jhps/hnae011","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"ORTHOPEDICS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Patient education is important as it gives patients a better understanding of the risks and benefits of medical and surgical interventions. Developing communication technologies have completely changed and enhanced patient access to medical information. The aim of this study was to evaluate available patient education materials (PEMs) regarding hip surgery on the websites of major hip societies and centers. The PEM from 11 selected leading hip centers and societies were evaluated with the following assessment tools: Flesch–Kincaid (FK) readability test, Flesch Reading Ease formula, Literature-Intelligence-Data-Analysis (LIDA) instrument and Discernibility Interpretability Sources Comprehensive Evidence Relevance Noticeable (DISCERN) tool. Videos were assessed using Patient Educational Video Assessment Tool (PEVAT). A total of 69 educational items, including 52 text articles (75.4%) and 17 videos (24.6%) were retrieved and evaluated. The median Interquartile Range (IQR) FK level of 52 text articles was 10.8 (2.2). The median (IQR) LIDA score of text articles by center was 45. According to the LIDA score, 60% of all website articles demonstrated high accessibility (LIDA score > 44). The median DISCERN score of text articles by center was 69. Overall, 52 (100%) of the text articles were deemed to be at ‘good’ quality rating or higher, and 23.2% (16 out of 69) of the articles had excellent quality. The mean PEVAT score for the 17 videos was 25 ± 1.9. Analysis of text and video articles from the 11 leading orthopedic surgery centers and societies demonstrated that by selecting a reliable source of information from main scientific societies and major centers in hip surgery, patients can find more accurate information regarding their hip conditions.
根据主要髋关节中心和学会的经验,总结髋关节手术患者教育材料的最佳做法
患者教育非常重要,因为它能让患者更好地了解医疗和手术干预的风险和益处。通信技术的发展彻底改变并增强了患者获取医疗信息的途径。本研究旨在评估主要髋关节学会和中心网站上有关髋关节手术的现有患者教育资料(PEM)。我们采用以下评估工具对 11 家主要髋关节中心和学会的患者教育材料进行了评估:弗莱什-金凯德(FK)可读性测试、弗莱什阅读容易度公式、文献-智能-数据分析(LIDA)工具和可辨认性-可解释性-来源-证据相关性综合通知(DISCERN)工具。视频采用患者教育视频评估工具(PEVAT)进行评估。共检索和评估了 69 个教育项目,包括 52 篇文字文章(75.4%)和 17 个视频(24.6%)。52 篇文本文章的 FK 水平中位数(IQR)为 10.8 (2.2)。各中心文本文章的 LIDA 评分中位数(IQR)为 45 分。根据 LIDA 评分,60% 的网站文章显示出较高的可访问性(LIDA 评分> 44)。各中心文本文章的 DISCERN 得分中位数为 69 分。总体而言,52 篇文本文章(100%)被认为质量等级为 "良好 "或更高,23.2% 的文章(69 篇中有 16 篇)质量优异。17 个视频的平均 PEVAT 得分为 25 ± 1.9。对来自 11 个主要骨科手术中心和学会的文字和视频文章进行的分析表明,通过从主要科学学会和主要髋关节手术中心选择可靠的信息来源,患者可以找到更准确的髋关节疾病信息。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
20.00%
发文量
45
审稿时长
12 weeks
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信