Multiple biomaterials for immediate implant placement tissue repair: Current status and future perspectives

Xiaoqi Su, Shasha Jia, Xueya Wang, Baodong Zhao, Guowei Wang, Xiaojing Wang
{"title":"Multiple biomaterials for immediate implant placement tissue repair: Current status and future perspectives","authors":"Xiaoqi Su,&nbsp;Shasha Jia,&nbsp;Xueya Wang,&nbsp;Baodong Zhao,&nbsp;Guowei Wang,&nbsp;Xiaojing Wang","doi":"10.1002/mba2.69","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p>Immediate oral implant placement is a widely accepted technique, known for its efficacy in reducing treatment duration, surgical visits, and overall healing time. One of the primary challenges associated with immediate implant placement is the attainment of initial stability. The inevitable loss of bone and soft tissue after extraction poses a risk to implant osseointegration in both vertical and horizontal dimensions. Guided tissue regeneration/guided bone regeneration (GTR/GBR) is a well-established method for periodontal regeneration. However, current GTR/GBR membranes lack tissue inherent regeneration properties and necessitate combination with grafts to enhance tissue recovery. In this context, biomaterials have emerged as a promising option due to their good biocompatibility, biodegradability, and bioactive properties. They present a potential alternative to standard autologous/allograft procedures. The field of biomaterials for bone regeneration has rapidly evolved, developing new guiding materials and engineering techniques. These advances have become integral in addressing tissue defects at the immediate implant site. Various materials such as bioceramics, natural polymers, and synthetic polymers have been used for tissue repair. This article undertakes an etiological examination of tissue deficiency associated with immediate implant placement. Additionally, it reviews the advantages and disadvantages of a variety of biomaterials, aiming to provide references for clinical treatment and areas for further investigation.</p>","PeriodicalId":100901,"journal":{"name":"MedComm – Biomaterials and Applications","volume":"3 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-02-29","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1002/mba2.69","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"MedComm – Biomaterials and Applications","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1002/mba2.69","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Immediate oral implant placement is a widely accepted technique, known for its efficacy in reducing treatment duration, surgical visits, and overall healing time. One of the primary challenges associated with immediate implant placement is the attainment of initial stability. The inevitable loss of bone and soft tissue after extraction poses a risk to implant osseointegration in both vertical and horizontal dimensions. Guided tissue regeneration/guided bone regeneration (GTR/GBR) is a well-established method for periodontal regeneration. However, current GTR/GBR membranes lack tissue inherent regeneration properties and necessitate combination with grafts to enhance tissue recovery. In this context, biomaterials have emerged as a promising option due to their good biocompatibility, biodegradability, and bioactive properties. They present a potential alternative to standard autologous/allograft procedures. The field of biomaterials for bone regeneration has rapidly evolved, developing new guiding materials and engineering techniques. These advances have become integral in addressing tissue defects at the immediate implant site. Various materials such as bioceramics, natural polymers, and synthetic polymers have been used for tissue repair. This article undertakes an etiological examination of tissue deficiency associated with immediate implant placement. Additionally, it reviews the advantages and disadvantages of a variety of biomaterials, aiming to provide references for clinical treatment and areas for further investigation.

Abstract Image

用于即刻植入组织修复的多种生物材料:现状与未来展望
即刻口腔种植体植入是一种广为接受的技术,因其能有效缩短治疗时间、手术次数和整体愈合时间而闻名。即刻种植的主要挑战之一是实现初期稳定性。拔牙后骨质和软组织不可避免地会流失,这给种植体在垂直和水平方向上的骨结合带来了风险。引导组织再生/引导骨再生(GTR/GBR)是一种行之有效的牙周再生方法。然而,目前的引导组织再生/引导骨再生膜缺乏组织固有的再生特性,必须与移植物相结合才能提高组织的恢复能力。在这种情况下,生物材料因其良好的生物相容性、生物可降解性和生物活性而成为一种很有前景的选择。它们是标准自体/异体移植手术的潜在替代品。骨再生生物材料领域发展迅速,开发出了新的引导材料和工程技术。这些进步已成为解决即刻种植部位组织缺损问题不可或缺的一部分。生物陶瓷、天然聚合物和合成聚合物等各种材料已被用于组织修复。本文对与即刻种植相关的组织缺损进行了病因学研究。此外,文章还回顾了各种生物材料的优缺点,旨在为临床治疗和进一步研究提供参考。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
1.10
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信