Language tests and tests of competence for registration purposes - a scoping review of the experiences of overseas nurses.

Contemporary nurse Pub Date : 2024-08-01 Epub Date: 2024-02-29 DOI:10.1080/10376178.2024.2318360
Dilla Davis, Shelly Sharma, Maria Taylor
{"title":"Language tests and tests of competence for registration purposes - a scoping review of the experiences of overseas nurses.","authors":"Dilla Davis, Shelly Sharma, Maria Taylor","doi":"10.1080/10376178.2024.2318360","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>The overseas applicant's capability of practising safely and effectively is proven through the tests of competence which consist of computer-based tests and the Objective Structured Clinical Examination (OSCE). All prospective applicants to the Nursing and Midwiferey Council (NMC) register must be able to demonstrate that their skills, knowledge and behaviours are at the level required to meet the NMC preregistration nursing or midwifery standards for the United Kingdom (UK).</p><p><strong>Aim: </strong>The aim of this review is to explore the challenges faced whilst undertaking these tests of competence, the OSCE, by overseas educated nurses who aspire for Nursing and Midwifery Council (NMC) registration in the UK.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>A scoping review using the Arksey and O'Malley (2005) framework was conducted to explore and produce a profile of the existing literature on the registration requirements of the NMC. A search of CINAHL, Medline and Scopus resulted in 150 records, which were then screened against the inclusion criteria - English Language, publication between 2015 onwards and discussed the language tests/competency tests required for gaining entry to the NMC register. A total of nine articles met the criteria and are included in this scoping review. The PRISMA-ScR framework is used to present the review.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>There was a paucity of studies that addressed the experience of overseas nurses who faced the OSCE. An interpretative stance was adopted to formulate the themes which were: competence/practice disparity, arbitrary issues for failing, failure to capture the digital health agenda, financial implications, and consequences of failing the OSCE. The results raise concern whether the nurses from overseas are held to higher standards than those trained in the UK and whether the assessment process is realistic and not pedantic.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>This scoping review demonstrates there is a lack of robust research evaluating the effectiveness of tests of competencies. The review indicates there is no due acknowledgement of the previous skills and knowledge of the overseas nurses. Future research should focus on exploring the feasibility of tests of competence and its role in the integration of the nursing workforce.</p>","PeriodicalId":93954,"journal":{"name":"Contemporary nurse","volume":" ","pages":"420-432"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-08-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Contemporary nurse","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/10376178.2024.2318360","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2024/2/29 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: The overseas applicant's capability of practising safely and effectively is proven through the tests of competence which consist of computer-based tests and the Objective Structured Clinical Examination (OSCE). All prospective applicants to the Nursing and Midwiferey Council (NMC) register must be able to demonstrate that their skills, knowledge and behaviours are at the level required to meet the NMC preregistration nursing or midwifery standards for the United Kingdom (UK).

Aim: The aim of this review is to explore the challenges faced whilst undertaking these tests of competence, the OSCE, by overseas educated nurses who aspire for Nursing and Midwifery Council (NMC) registration in the UK.

Methods: A scoping review using the Arksey and O'Malley (2005) framework was conducted to explore and produce a profile of the existing literature on the registration requirements of the NMC. A search of CINAHL, Medline and Scopus resulted in 150 records, which were then screened against the inclusion criteria - English Language, publication between 2015 onwards and discussed the language tests/competency tests required for gaining entry to the NMC register. A total of nine articles met the criteria and are included in this scoping review. The PRISMA-ScR framework is used to present the review.

Results: There was a paucity of studies that addressed the experience of overseas nurses who faced the OSCE. An interpretative stance was adopted to formulate the themes which were: competence/practice disparity, arbitrary issues for failing, failure to capture the digital health agenda, financial implications, and consequences of failing the OSCE. The results raise concern whether the nurses from overseas are held to higher standards than those trained in the UK and whether the assessment process is realistic and not pedantic.

Conclusions: This scoping review demonstrates there is a lack of robust research evaluating the effectiveness of tests of competencies. The review indicates there is no due acknowledgement of the previous skills and knowledge of the overseas nurses. Future research should focus on exploring the feasibility of tests of competence and its role in the integration of the nursing workforce.

以注册为目的的语言测试和能力测试--海外护士经验的范围审查。
背景:海外申请人安全有效地执业的能力是通过能力测试来证明的,能力测试包括计算机测试和客观结构化临床考试(OSCE)。所有有望申请护理与助产委员会(NMC)注册的申请人必须能够证明其技能、知识和行为达到了英国(UK)护理与助产委员会注册前护理或助产标准所要求的水平。目的:本综述旨在探讨希望在英国护理与助产委员会(NMC)注册的受过海外教育的护士在进行这些能力测试(OSCE)时所面临的挑战:方法:采用 Arksey 和 O'Malley(2005 年)框架进行了一次范围界定审查,以探索和编制有关 NMC 注册要求的现有文献概况。通过对 CINAHL、Medline 和 Scopus 的检索,共获得 150 条记录,然后根据纳入标准对这些记录进行筛选--英语语言、发表于 2015 年之后,并讨论了进入 NMC 注册所需的语言测试/能力测试。共有 9 篇文章符合标准,被纳入本范围界定综述。本综述采用了 PRISMA-ScR 框架:很少有研究涉及海外护士面对 OSCE 的经历。我们采用了一种解释性的立场来制定主题,即:能力/实践差异、失败的任意性问题、未能抓住数字健康议程、财务影响以及 OSCE 失败的后果。结果引起了人们的关注,即海外护士是否比在英国接受培训的护士有更高的标准,以及评估过程是否现实而不是迂腐:此次范围界定审查表明,缺乏对能力测试有效性进行评估的可靠研究。综述表明,海外护士以往的技能和知识没有得到应有的承认。未来的研究应侧重于探索能力测试的可行性及其在整合护理人员队伍中的作用。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信