[Radiofrequency denervation of the spine and the sacroiliac joint : A systematic literature search according to GRADE with new German S3 guideline].

IF 1.1 4区 医学 Q3 ANESTHESIOLOGY
Schmerz Pub Date : 2024-03-01 DOI:10.1007/s00482-024-00799-w
Stephan Klessinger, Hans-Raimund Casser, Sebastian Gillner, Holger Koepp, Andreas Kopf, Martin Legat, Katharina Meiler, Heike Norda, Markus Schneider, Matti Scholz, Phillipp J Slotty, Volker Tronnier, Martin Vazan, Karsten Wiechert
{"title":"[Radiofrequency denervation of the spine and the sacroiliac joint : A systematic literature search according to GRADE with new German S3 guideline].","authors":"Stephan Klessinger, Hans-Raimund Casser, Sebastian Gillner, Holger Koepp, Andreas Kopf, Martin Legat, Katharina Meiler, Heike Norda, Markus Schneider, Matti Scholz, Phillipp J Slotty, Volker Tronnier, Martin Vazan, Karsten Wiechert","doi":"10.1007/s00482-024-00799-w","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>This article summarizes the results of the German guideline on radiofrequency denervation of the facet joints and the sacroiliac joint. Evidence on the indications, test blocks and technical parameters are presented.</p><p><strong>Objective: </strong>The aim is to avoid overtreatment and undertreatment, which is also of socioeconomic importance.</p><p><strong>Material and method: </strong>A systematic evaluation of the literature was carried out according to the grading of recommendations assessment, development and evaluation (GRADE) approach. A multidisciplinary guideline group has developed recommendations and statements.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Statements and recommendations were given for 20 key questions. There was an 87.5% consensus for 1 recommendation and 100% consensus for all other recommendations and statements. The guideline was approved by all scientific medical societies involved. Specific questions included the value of the medical history, examination and imaging, the need for conservative treatment prior to an intervention, the importance of test blocks (medial branch block and lateral branch block), choice of imaging for denervation, choice of trajectory, the possibility to influence the size of the lesion, stimulation, the possibility of revision, sedation and decision support for patients with anticoagulants, metal implants and pacemakers and advice on how to avoid complications.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Selected patients can benefit from well-performed radiofrequency denervation. The guideline recommendations are based on very low to moderate quality of evidence.</p>","PeriodicalId":21572,"journal":{"name":"Schmerz","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":1.1000,"publicationDate":"2024-03-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Schmerz","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1007/s00482-024-00799-w","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"ANESTHESIOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: This article summarizes the results of the German guideline on radiofrequency denervation of the facet joints and the sacroiliac joint. Evidence on the indications, test blocks and technical parameters are presented.

Objective: The aim is to avoid overtreatment and undertreatment, which is also of socioeconomic importance.

Material and method: A systematic evaluation of the literature was carried out according to the grading of recommendations assessment, development and evaluation (GRADE) approach. A multidisciplinary guideline group has developed recommendations and statements.

Results: Statements and recommendations were given for 20 key questions. There was an 87.5% consensus for 1 recommendation and 100% consensus for all other recommendations and statements. The guideline was approved by all scientific medical societies involved. Specific questions included the value of the medical history, examination and imaging, the need for conservative treatment prior to an intervention, the importance of test blocks (medial branch block and lateral branch block), choice of imaging for denervation, choice of trajectory, the possibility to influence the size of the lesion, stimulation, the possibility of revision, sedation and decision support for patients with anticoagulants, metal implants and pacemakers and advice on how to avoid complications.

Conclusion: Selected patients can benefit from well-performed radiofrequency denervation. The guideline recommendations are based on very low to moderate quality of evidence.

[脊柱和骶髂关节射频去神经:根据 GRADE 和新的德国 S3 指南进行的系统性文献检索]。
背景:本文总结了德国关于射频去神经治疗面关节和骶髂关节的指南结果。文章介绍了有关适应症、测试块和技术参数的证据:目的:避免过度治疗和治疗不足,这也具有重要的社会经济意义:材料和方法:根据建议评估、发展和评价分级法(GRADE)对文献进行了系统评估。一个多学科指南小组制定了建议和声明:结果:针对 20 个关键问题提出了声明和建议。对 1 项建议达成了 87.5% 的共识,对所有其他建议和声明达成了 100% 的共识。该指南获得了所有相关科学医学会的批准。具体问题包括病史、检查和成像的价值,干预前保守治疗的必要性,测试阻滞(内侧支阻滞和外侧支阻滞)的重要性,去神经化成像的选择,轨迹的选择,影响病变大小的可能性,刺激,翻修的可能性,镇静和对使用抗凝剂、金属植入物和心脏起搏器患者的决策支持,以及如何避免并发症的建议:结论:经过选择的患者可以从操作良好的射频去神经支配术中获益。该指南的建议基于极低至中等质量的证据。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Schmerz
Schmerz 医学-临床神经学
CiteScore
2.00
自引率
20.00%
发文量
64
审稿时长
6-12 weeks
期刊介绍: Der Schmerz is an internationally recognized journal and addresses all scientists, practitioners and psychologists, dealing with the treatment of pain patients or working in pain research. The aim of the journal is to enhance the treatment of pain patients in the long run. Review articles provide an overview on selected topics and offer the reader a summary of current findings from all fields of pain research, pain management and pain symptom management. Freely submitted original papers allow the presentation of important clinical studies and serve the scientific exchange. Case reports feature interesting cases and aim at optimizing diagnostic and therapeutic strategies. Review articles under the rubric ''Continuing Medical Education'' present verified results of scientific research and their integration into daily practice.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信