Salutogenic health measures: Psychometric properties of the Danish versions of the Flourish Index and the Secure Flourish Index.

IF 1.8 3区 心理学 Q2 PSYCHOLOGY, MULTIDISCIPLINARY
Scandinavian journal of psychology Pub Date : 2024-08-01 Epub Date: 2024-02-29 DOI:10.1111/sjop.13011
Tobias Anker Stripp, Richard G Cowden, Sonja Wehberg, Linda Juel Ahrenfeldt, Niels Christian Hvidt, Matthew T Lee
{"title":"Salutogenic health measures: Psychometric properties of the Danish versions of the Flourish Index and the Secure Flourish Index.","authors":"Tobias Anker Stripp, Richard G Cowden, Sonja Wehberg, Linda Juel Ahrenfeldt, Niels Christian Hvidt, Matthew T Lee","doi":"10.1111/sjop.13011","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Measurement of human flourishing represents a salutogenic approach to epidemiological and behavioral research emphasizing factors contributing to \"good lives\" rather than pathology. The objective of this study was to translate and psychometrically test the 10-item Flourish Index (FI) and 12-item Secure Flourish Index (SFI) in a convenience sample of Danish adults. A total of 325 participants completed a cross-sectional survey, with 148 of those participants completing the survey a second time (retest). Confirmatory factor analysis in a structural equation modelling framework was used to establish structural validity by comparing four different pre-specified models of the indexes. Additionally, internal consistency, convergent and incremental validity, and retest reliability were examined. The FI models exhibited superior structural validity compared with similar models of the SFI, although all models had good fits. Internal consistencies with McDonald's omega were 0.89 and 0.87 for the FI and SFI, respectively. The five (FI) or six (SFI) domains were happiness & life satisfaction, mental & physical health, meaning & purpose, character & virtue, close social relationships, and financial & material stability (λ<sub>4</sub> = 0.51-0.91). Convergent and incremental validity tests supported predefined hypotheses. Retest analyses with the FI and SFI showed a high degree of retest reliability. Based on the psychometric evidence reported in this study, the Danish Flourish Index and Secure Flourish Index seem suitable for use with healthy adult Danes. The authors hope that this psychometric evaluation of the FI and SFI will stimulate research on patterns, health and economic outcomes, and predictors of human flourishing in Denmark.</p>","PeriodicalId":21435,"journal":{"name":"Scandinavian journal of psychology","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":1.8000,"publicationDate":"2024-08-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Scandinavian journal of psychology","FirstCategoryId":"102","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1111/sjop.13011","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"心理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2024/2/29 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"PSYCHOLOGY, MULTIDISCIPLINARY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Measurement of human flourishing represents a salutogenic approach to epidemiological and behavioral research emphasizing factors contributing to "good lives" rather than pathology. The objective of this study was to translate and psychometrically test the 10-item Flourish Index (FI) and 12-item Secure Flourish Index (SFI) in a convenience sample of Danish adults. A total of 325 participants completed a cross-sectional survey, with 148 of those participants completing the survey a second time (retest). Confirmatory factor analysis in a structural equation modelling framework was used to establish structural validity by comparing four different pre-specified models of the indexes. Additionally, internal consistency, convergent and incremental validity, and retest reliability were examined. The FI models exhibited superior structural validity compared with similar models of the SFI, although all models had good fits. Internal consistencies with McDonald's omega were 0.89 and 0.87 for the FI and SFI, respectively. The five (FI) or six (SFI) domains were happiness & life satisfaction, mental & physical health, meaning & purpose, character & virtue, close social relationships, and financial & material stability (λ4 = 0.51-0.91). Convergent and incremental validity tests supported predefined hypotheses. Retest analyses with the FI and SFI showed a high degree of retest reliability. Based on the psychometric evidence reported in this study, the Danish Flourish Index and Secure Flourish Index seem suitable for use with healthy adult Danes. The authors hope that this psychometric evaluation of the FI and SFI will stimulate research on patterns, health and economic outcomes, and predictors of human flourishing in Denmark.

有益健康的测量方法:丹麦版 "幸福指数 "和 "安全幸福指数 "的心理计量特性。
对人类幸福感的测量是流行病学和行为学研究的一种有益方法,它强调的是有助于 "美好生活 "而非病态的因素。本研究的目的是在丹麦成年人的方便样本中翻译并测试 10 个项目的幸福指数(FI)和 12 个项目的安全幸福指数(SFI)。共有 325 名参与者完成了横向调查,其中 148 名参与者完成了第二次调查(重测)。通过比较四种不同的指数预设模型,在结构方程建模框架下使用了确认性因子分析来建立结构有效性。此外,还考察了内部一致性、收敛有效性和增量有效性以及重测可靠性。尽管所有模型都具有良好的拟合效果,但与 SFI 的类似模型相比,FI 模型表现出更高的结构效度。FI 和 SFI 与麦当劳欧米茄的内部一致性分别为 0.89 和 0.87。五个(FI)或六个(SFI)领域分别为幸福与生活满意度、身心健康、意义与目的、性格与美德、亲密的社会关系以及财务与物质稳定性(λ4 = 0.51-0.91)。收敛性和增量有效性测试支持预定义假设。FI和SFI的重测分析表明重测可靠性很高。根据本研究报告的心理测量学证据,丹麦幸福指数和安全幸福指数似乎适合用于健康的丹麦成年人。作者希望对丹麦幸福指数和安全幸福指数的心理测量评估能够促进对丹麦人的幸福模式、健康和经济成果以及预测因素的研究。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Scandinavian journal of psychology
Scandinavian journal of psychology PSYCHOLOGY, MULTIDISCIPLINARY-
CiteScore
4.20
自引率
0.00%
发文量
102
期刊介绍: Published in association with the Nordic psychological associations, the Scandinavian Journal of Psychology publishes original papers from Scandinavia and elsewhere. Covering the whole range of psychology, with a particular focus on experimental psychology, the journal includes high-quality theoretical and methodological papers, empirical reports, reviews and ongoing commentaries.Scandinavian Journal of Psychology is organised into four standing subsections: - Cognition and Neurosciences - Development and Aging - Personality and Social Sciences - Health and Disability
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信