Adhesion of glass ionomer cements to primary dentin using a universal adhesive.

IF 4.6 Q2 MATERIALS SCIENCE, BIOMATERIALS
Parastoo Iranparvar, Amir Ghasemi, Pouria Iranparvar
{"title":"Adhesion of glass ionomer cements to primary dentin using a universal adhesive.","authors":"Parastoo Iranparvar, Amir Ghasemi, Pouria Iranparvar","doi":"10.17219/dmp/131066","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Glass ionomers are widely used for restoring carious primary teeth. However, their ability to bond to primary dentin is considered a challenge in pediatric dentistry.</p><p><strong>Objectives: </strong>The study aimed to evaluate the microshear bond strength (μSBS) of a resin-modified glass ionomer (RMGI) and a high-viscosity glass ionomer cement (Hv-GIC) to primary dentin using a universal adhesive.</p><p><strong>Material and methods: </strong>Thirty human primary maxillary canines were cut in half and prepared for the μSBS test. The specimens (N = 60) were assigned to 6 groups. Three groups were defined for RMGI (FUJI II LC) and 3 groups for Hv-GIC (EQUIA Forte): with an immediately curing adhesive (G-Premio); with a delayed curing adhesive; and without an adhesive (control group). After preparing the dentin surfaces, the glass ionomers were bonded using Tygon® tubes with an internal diameter of 0.7 mm. The μSBS test was performed, and the data was analyzed using two-way analysis of variance (ANOVA) followed by Tukey's post hoc test. Additionally, the failure modes were determined using a stereomicroscope. Six specimens, one for each study group, were prepared for scanning electron microscopy (SEM) analysis to observe the glass ionomer-dentin interface.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The type of glass ionomer did not have a significant effect on the μSBS (p = 0.305). Groups that received universal adhesive application prior to glass ionomer exhibited a significantly higher μSBS (p < 0.0001). However, there was no significant difference between the immediately curing and delayed curing groups (p = 0.157). The predominant failure mode was mixed failure.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Higher bond strength of glass ionomers to primary teeth can be achieved by using universal adhesives, which, in addition to the proven benefits of glass ionomers, can improve their clinical success.</p>","PeriodicalId":2,"journal":{"name":"ACS Applied Bio Materials","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":4.6000,"publicationDate":"2024-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"ACS Applied Bio Materials","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.17219/dmp/131066","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"MATERIALS SCIENCE, BIOMATERIALS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: Glass ionomers are widely used for restoring carious primary teeth. However, their ability to bond to primary dentin is considered a challenge in pediatric dentistry.

Objectives: The study aimed to evaluate the microshear bond strength (μSBS) of a resin-modified glass ionomer (RMGI) and a high-viscosity glass ionomer cement (Hv-GIC) to primary dentin using a universal adhesive.

Material and methods: Thirty human primary maxillary canines were cut in half and prepared for the μSBS test. The specimens (N = 60) were assigned to 6 groups. Three groups were defined for RMGI (FUJI II LC) and 3 groups for Hv-GIC (EQUIA Forte): with an immediately curing adhesive (G-Premio); with a delayed curing adhesive; and without an adhesive (control group). After preparing the dentin surfaces, the glass ionomers were bonded using Tygon® tubes with an internal diameter of 0.7 mm. The μSBS test was performed, and the data was analyzed using two-way analysis of variance (ANOVA) followed by Tukey's post hoc test. Additionally, the failure modes were determined using a stereomicroscope. Six specimens, one for each study group, were prepared for scanning electron microscopy (SEM) analysis to observe the glass ionomer-dentin interface.

Results: The type of glass ionomer did not have a significant effect on the μSBS (p = 0.305). Groups that received universal adhesive application prior to glass ionomer exhibited a significantly higher μSBS (p < 0.0001). However, there was no significant difference between the immediately curing and delayed curing groups (p = 0.157). The predominant failure mode was mixed failure.

Conclusions: Higher bond strength of glass ionomers to primary teeth can be achieved by using universal adhesives, which, in addition to the proven benefits of glass ionomers, can improve their clinical success.

使用通用粘合剂将玻璃离聚体水门汀粘合到基牙上。
背景:玻璃离聚体被广泛用于修复龋坏的基牙。然而,在儿童牙科中,玻璃离聚体与基牙牙本质的粘结能力被认为是一个挑战:研究旨在评估使用通用粘合剂的树脂改性玻璃离聚体(RMGI)和高粘度玻璃离聚体粘结剂(Hv-GIC)与基牙牙本质的微剪切粘结强度(μSBS):将 30 颗人类上颌原生犬齿切成两半,准备进行 μSBS 试验。标本(N = 60)被分为 6 组。三组用于 RMGI(FUJI II LC),三组用于 Hv-GIC(EQUIA Forte):使用即刻固化粘合剂(G-Premio);使用延迟固化粘合剂;不使用粘合剂(对照组)。准备好牙本质表面后,使用内径为 0.7 毫米的 Tygon® 管粘接玻璃离聚体。进行了 μSBS 检验,并使用双向方差分析 (ANOVA) 和 Tukey 后检验对数据进行了分析。此外,还使用体视显微镜确定了失效模式。为观察玻璃离聚体-牙本质界面,准备了六个试样,每个研究组一个,进行扫描电子显微镜(SEM)分析:结果:玻璃离聚物的类型对 μSBS 没有显著影响(p = 0.305)。在使用玻璃离聚体之前使用通用粘合剂的组,其 μSBS 明显更高(p < 0.0001)。但是,立即固化组和延迟固化组之间没有明显差异(p = 0.157)。主要的失效模式是混合失效:使用通用粘合剂可以提高玻璃离聚体与基牙的粘接强度,除了玻璃离聚体已被证实的优点外,还可以提高其临床成功率。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
ACS Applied Bio Materials
ACS Applied Bio Materials Chemistry-Chemistry (all)
CiteScore
9.40
自引率
2.10%
发文量
464
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信