Clear aligner therapy versus conventional brackets: Oral impacts over time.

Q2 Dentistry
Dental Research Journal Pub Date : 2024-01-25 eCollection Date: 2024-01-01
Sara Hashemi, Seyed Saman Hashemi, Kioumars Tavakoli Tafti, Seyed Sobhan Khademi, Niyosha Ariana, Shohreh Ghasemi, Mahmood Dashti, Hamed Ghanati, Marjan Mansourian
{"title":"Clear aligner therapy versus conventional brackets: Oral impacts over time.","authors":"Sara Hashemi, Seyed Saman Hashemi, Kioumars Tavakoli Tafti, Seyed Sobhan Khademi, Niyosha Ariana, Shohreh Ghasemi, Mahmood Dashti, Hamed Ghanati, Marjan Mansourian","doi":"","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>The objective is to compare the impact of clear aligner treatment (CAT) versus conventional fixed appliance treatment (FAT) on oral health-related quality of life (OHRQoL) among adults at five-time points: pretreatment (T0), 1 week (T1), 1 month after (T2), and 6 months after (T3) treatment initiation, and in the long-term follow-up (T4).</p><p><strong>Materials and methods: </strong>Search terms were based on Medical Subject Headings (MeSH) and non-MeSH. Potentially eligible studies compared OHRQoL in clear aligner (CA) and fixed appliance (FA) patients. In February 2023, Scopus, Web of Science, Cochrane, and PubMed were searched for published studies. Nine out of 94 shortlisted papers were eligible for a systematic review. Of these nine papers, five studies were considered for a meta-analysis.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>At T0, CA and FA patients had similar oral health impact profile (OHIP)-14 questionnaire scores with a standard mean difference (SMD) of 0.105 (confidence interval [CI]: -1.029-1.48). The SMD of the OHRQoL related to T1, T2, and T3 was -3.119 (CI: -0.145, 0.355), -1.527 (CI: -5.597, -0.64), and - 2.331 (CI: -1.906, -1.148). T4 showed no difference between groups (SMD = 0.007, CI: CI: -4.286, -0.376). Regarding the OHIP-14 domains, functional limitations remained consistent in both groups across all time intervals. Psychological discomfort exhibited a notable difference only at T2. Throughout the treatment, CAT showed significantly lower levels of physical, psychological, and social disability, as well as handicap, though these differences did not persist beyond T4. Notably, physical pain was the sole domain that remained elevated in the FAT group up to T4.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>During the 1<sup>st</sup> day of the orthodontic treatment, both the CA and FA groups had comparable OHRQoL statuses. However, as time passed, the CA group notably improved their OHRQoL compared to the FA group. Interestingly, after a year or the completion of treatment, both groups eventually reached similar OHRQoL levels. Nevertheless, it is worth noting that FA patients continued to experience more physical pain even a year later.</p>","PeriodicalId":11016,"journal":{"name":"Dental Research Journal","volume":"21 ","pages":"6"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-01-25","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10899161/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Dental Research Journal","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2024/1/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"Dentistry","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: The objective is to compare the impact of clear aligner treatment (CAT) versus conventional fixed appliance treatment (FAT) on oral health-related quality of life (OHRQoL) among adults at five-time points: pretreatment (T0), 1 week (T1), 1 month after (T2), and 6 months after (T3) treatment initiation, and in the long-term follow-up (T4).

Materials and methods: Search terms were based on Medical Subject Headings (MeSH) and non-MeSH. Potentially eligible studies compared OHRQoL in clear aligner (CA) and fixed appliance (FA) patients. In February 2023, Scopus, Web of Science, Cochrane, and PubMed were searched for published studies. Nine out of 94 shortlisted papers were eligible for a systematic review. Of these nine papers, five studies were considered for a meta-analysis.

Results: At T0, CA and FA patients had similar oral health impact profile (OHIP)-14 questionnaire scores with a standard mean difference (SMD) of 0.105 (confidence interval [CI]: -1.029-1.48). The SMD of the OHRQoL related to T1, T2, and T3 was -3.119 (CI: -0.145, 0.355), -1.527 (CI: -5.597, -0.64), and - 2.331 (CI: -1.906, -1.148). T4 showed no difference between groups (SMD = 0.007, CI: CI: -4.286, -0.376). Regarding the OHIP-14 domains, functional limitations remained consistent in both groups across all time intervals. Psychological discomfort exhibited a notable difference only at T2. Throughout the treatment, CAT showed significantly lower levels of physical, psychological, and social disability, as well as handicap, though these differences did not persist beyond T4. Notably, physical pain was the sole domain that remained elevated in the FAT group up to T4.

Conclusion: During the 1st day of the orthodontic treatment, both the CA and FA groups had comparable OHRQoL statuses. However, as time passed, the CA group notably improved their OHRQoL compared to the FA group. Interestingly, after a year or the completion of treatment, both groups eventually reached similar OHRQoL levels. Nevertheless, it is worth noting that FA patients continued to experience more physical pain even a year later.

透明矫治器疗法与传统托槽:随着时间的推移对口腔的影响
研究背景目的是比较透明矫治器治疗(CAT)与传统固定矫治器治疗(FAT)在五个时间点对成人口腔健康相关生活质量(OHRQoL)的影响:治疗前(T0)、治疗后1周(T1)、治疗后1个月(T2)、治疗后6个月(T3)以及长期随访(T4):搜索词基于医学主题词表(MeSH)和非 MeSH。符合条件的潜在研究对透明矫治器(CA)和固定矫治器(FA)患者的 OHRQoL 进行了比较。2023 年 2 月,Scopus、Web of Science、Cochrane 和 PubMed 对已发表的研究进行了检索。在 94 篇入围论文中,有 9 篇符合系统综述的条件。在这9篇论文中,有5项研究被考虑进行荟萃分析:在T0时,CA和FA患者的口腔健康影响档案(OHIP)-14问卷得分相似,标准平均差(SMD)为0.105(置信区间[CI]:-1.029-1.48)。与 T1、T2 和 T3 有关的 OHRQoL 的 SMD 分别为-3.119(置信区间[CI]:-0.145,0.355)、-1.527(置信区间[CI]:-5.597,-0.64)和-2.331(置信区间[CI]:-1.906,-1.148)。T4 组间无差异(SMD = 0.007,CI:CI:-4.286,-0.376)。在 OHIP-14 领域中,两组的功能限制在所有时间间隔内均保持一致。心理不适仅在第二阶段表现出明显差异。在整个治疗过程中,CAT 的身体、心理和社会残疾以及残障水平都明显降低,但这些差异在 T4 之后并没有持续。值得注意的是,身体疼痛是 FAT 组唯一一个直到 T4 仍保持升高的领域:结论:在正畸治疗的第一天,CA 组和 FA 组的 OHRQoL 状况相当。然而,随着时间的推移,与 FA 组相比,CA 组的 OHRQoL 显著改善。有趣的是,一年后或治疗结束后,两组患者的 OHRQoL 最终都达到了相似的水平。尽管如此,值得注意的是,即使在一年后,FA 患者仍然承受着更多的身体疼痛。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Dental Research Journal
Dental Research Journal Dentistry-Dentistry (all)
CiteScore
1.70
自引率
0.00%
发文量
70
审稿时长
52 weeks
期刊介绍: Dental Research Journal, a publication of Isfahan University of Medical Sciences, is a peer-reviewed online journal with Bimonthly print on demand compilation of issues published. The journal’s full text is available online at http://www.drjjournal.net. The journal allows free access (Open Access) to its contents and permits authors to self-archive final accepted version of the articles on any OAI-compliant institutional / subject-based repository. The journal will cover technical and clinical studies related to health, ethical and social issues in field of Dentistry. Articles with clinical interest and implications will be given preference.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信