PROTOCOL: Effects of social prescribing for older adults: An evidence and gap map

IF 4 Q1 SOCIAL SCIENCES, INTERDISCIPLINARY

Campbell Systematic Reviews Pub Date : 2024-02-29 DOI:10.1002/cl2.1382

Elizabeth Tanjong Ghogomu, Vivian Welch, Mojde Yaqubi, Omar Dewidar, Victoria I. Barbeau, Srija Biswas, Kiffer Card, Sonia Hsiung, Caitlin Muhl, Michelle Nelson, Douglas M. Salzwedel, Marianne Saragosa, Cindy Yu, Kate Mulligan, Paul Hébert

{"title":"PROTOCOL: Effects of social prescribing for older adults: An evidence and gap map","authors":"Elizabeth Tanjong Ghogomu, Vivian Welch, Mojde Yaqubi, Omar Dewidar, Victoria I. Barbeau, Srija Biswas, Kiffer Card, Sonia Hsiung, Caitlin Muhl, Michelle Nelson, Douglas M. Salzwedel, Marianne Saragosa, Cindy Yu, Kate Mulligan, Paul Hébert","doi":"10.1002/cl2.1382","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div>\n \n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Objectives</h3>\n \n <p>This is the protocol for an evidence and gap map. The objectives are as follows: The aim of this evidence and gap map is to map the available evidence on the effectiveness of social prescribing interventions addressing a non-medical, health-related social need for older adults in any setting.</p>\n \n <p>Specific objectives are as follows:</p>\n \n <div>\n \n <ul>\n \n <li><span>1. </span>\n \n <p>To identify existing evidence from primary studies and systematic reviews on the effects of community-based interventions that address non-medical, health-related social needs of older adults to improve their health and wellbeing.</p>\n </li>\n \n <li><span>2. </span>\n \n <p>To identify research evidence gaps for new high-quality primary studies and systematic reviews.</p>\n </li>\n \n <li><span>3. </span>\n \n <p>To highlight evidence of health equity considerations from included primary studies and systematic reviews.</p>\n </li>\n </ul>\n </div>\n </section>\n </div>","PeriodicalId":36698,"journal":{"name":"Campbell Systematic Reviews","volume":"20 2","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":4.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-02-29","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1002/cl2.1382","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Campbell Systematic Reviews","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1002/cl2.1382","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"SOCIAL SCIENCES, INTERDISCIPLINARY","Score":null,"Total":0}

引用次数: 0

Abstract

Objectives

This is the protocol for an evidence and gap map. The objectives are as follows: The aim of this evidence and gap map is to map the available evidence on the effectiveness of social prescribing interventions addressing a non-medical, health-related social need for older adults in any setting.

Specific objectives are as follows:

1.
To identify existing evidence from primary studies and systematic reviews on the effects of community-based interventions that address non-medical, health-related social needs of older adults to improve their health and wellbeing.
2.
To identify research evidence gaps for new high-quality primary studies and systematic reviews.
3.
To highlight evidence of health equity considerations from included primary studies and systematic reviews.

Abstract Image

查看原文本刊更多论文

方案：社会处方对老年人的影响：证据和差距图

目标这是证据和差距图的规程。目标如下：本证据与差距图旨在绘制有关社会处方干预有效性的现有证据，以满足老年人在任何环境下与健康无关的社会需求。具体目标如下 1. 从初步研究和系统性综述中找出现有证据，说明以社区为基础的干预措施在满足老年人非医疗、与健康相关的社会需求以改善其健康和福祉方面的效果。 2. 确定新的高质量初步研究和系统性综述的研究证据差距。 3. 从已纳入的初步研究和系统性综述中突出健康公平考虑因素的证据。

本文章由计算机程序翻译，如有差异，请以英文原文为准。

求助全文

约1分钟内获得全文求助全文

来源期刊