Matthew Jackson MN , Lauren McTier PhD , Laura A. Brooks MN , Rochelle Wynne PhD
{"title":"Impact Of Simulation Design Elements on Undergraduate Nursing Education: A Systematic Review","authors":"Matthew Jackson MN , Lauren McTier PhD , Laura A. Brooks MN , Rochelle Wynne PhD","doi":"10.1016/j.ecns.2024.101519","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><p>The primary aim of this review was to determine the effect of simulation-based education, when compared to traditional teaching methods in undergraduate nursing programs. The secondary aims were to describe variability in design elements. A systematic review and narrative synthesis of quantitative studies. CINAHL, MEDLINE, APA PsycInfo, ERIC, and EMBASE. Databases were searched from 1990 to 2023. Articles were screened in Covidence. Quality assessment using the MMAT, RoB, Cochrane RoB2, and ROBINS-I. Synthesis without meta-analyses was used to examine extracted data. When simulation-based education was compared to traditional education knowledge significantly improved in 16 (62%) studies, skills in 29 (64%) studies, and improvement in attitude in eight (44%) studies. Reporting of design elements was deficient. Variability in design elements, implementation, and evaluation of simulation-based education underpin the current evidence making it difficult to accurately measure the effect of simulation-based education on learning outcomes.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":48753,"journal":{"name":"Clinical Simulation in Nursing","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":3.4000,"publicationDate":"2024-02-29","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1876139924000112/pdfft?md5=c7a3482f08ff01b8ef9f6983755ecd67&pid=1-s2.0-S1876139924000112-main.pdf","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Clinical Simulation in Nursing","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1876139924000112","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"NURSING","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
The primary aim of this review was to determine the effect of simulation-based education, when compared to traditional teaching methods in undergraduate nursing programs. The secondary aims were to describe variability in design elements. A systematic review and narrative synthesis of quantitative studies. CINAHL, MEDLINE, APA PsycInfo, ERIC, and EMBASE. Databases were searched from 1990 to 2023. Articles were screened in Covidence. Quality assessment using the MMAT, RoB, Cochrane RoB2, and ROBINS-I. Synthesis without meta-analyses was used to examine extracted data. When simulation-based education was compared to traditional education knowledge significantly improved in 16 (62%) studies, skills in 29 (64%) studies, and improvement in attitude in eight (44%) studies. Reporting of design elements was deficient. Variability in design elements, implementation, and evaluation of simulation-based education underpin the current evidence making it difficult to accurately measure the effect of simulation-based education on learning outcomes.
期刊介绍:
Clinical Simulation in Nursing is an international, peer reviewed journal published online monthly. Clinical Simulation in Nursing is the official journal of the International Nursing Association for Clinical Simulation & Learning (INACSL) and reflects its mission to advance the science of healthcare simulation.
We will review and accept articles from other health provider disciplines, if they are determined to be of interest to our readership. The journal accepts manuscripts meeting one or more of the following criteria:
Research articles and literature reviews (e.g. systematic, scoping, umbrella, integrative, etc.) about simulation
Innovative teaching/learning strategies using simulation
Articles updating guidelines, regulations, and legislative policies that impact simulation
Leadership for simulation
Simulation operations
Clinical and academic uses of simulation.