Contamination fear and attention bias variability early in the COVID-19 pandemic

IF 4.2 2区 心理学 Q1 PSYCHOLOGY, CLINICAL
Patrick J.F. Clarke , Elise Szeremeta , Bram Van Bockstaele , Lies Notebaert , Frances Meeten , Jemma Todd
{"title":"Contamination fear and attention bias variability early in the COVID-19 pandemic","authors":"Patrick J.F. Clarke ,&nbsp;Elise Szeremeta ,&nbsp;Bram Van Bockstaele ,&nbsp;Lies Notebaert ,&nbsp;Frances Meeten ,&nbsp;Jemma Todd","doi":"10.1016/j.brat.2024.104497","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><p>The onset of the COVID-19 pandemic resulted in a dramatic increase in the salience and importance of information relating to both the risk of infection, and factors that could mitigate against such risk. This is likely to have contributed to elevated contamination fear concerns in the general population. Biased attention for contamination-related information has been proposed as a potential mechanism underlying contamination fear, though evidence regarding the presence of such biased attention has been inconsistent. A possible reason for this is that contamination fear may be characterised by variability in attention bias that has not yet been examined. The current study examined the potential association between attention bias variability for both contamination-related and mitigation-related stimuli, and contamination fear during the early stages of the COVID-19 pandemic. A final sample of 315 participants completed measures of attention bias and contamination fear. The measure of average attention bias for contamination-related stimuli and mitigation-related stimuli was not associated with contamination fear (<em>r</em> = 0.055 and <em>r</em> = 0.051, <em>p</em> &gt; 0.10), though both attention bias variability measures did show a small but statistically significant relationship with contamination fear (<em>r</em> = 0.133, <em>p</em> &lt; 0.05; r = 0.147, <em>p</em> &lt; 0.01). These attention bias variability measures also accounted for significant additional variance in contamination fear above the average attention bias measure (and controlling for response time variability). These findings provide initial evidence for the association between attention bias variability and contamination fear, underscoring a potential target for cognitive bias interventions for clinical contamination fear.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":48457,"journal":{"name":"Behaviour Research and Therapy","volume":"175 ","pages":"Article 104497"},"PeriodicalIF":4.2000,"publicationDate":"2024-02-24","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S000579672400024X/pdfft?md5=6bc0d90941c8d2b1fd0343d6bbeef3a2&pid=1-s2.0-S000579672400024X-main.pdf","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Behaviour Research and Therapy","FirstCategoryId":"102","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S000579672400024X","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"心理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"PSYCHOLOGY, CLINICAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

The onset of the COVID-19 pandemic resulted in a dramatic increase in the salience and importance of information relating to both the risk of infection, and factors that could mitigate against such risk. This is likely to have contributed to elevated contamination fear concerns in the general population. Biased attention for contamination-related information has been proposed as a potential mechanism underlying contamination fear, though evidence regarding the presence of such biased attention has been inconsistent. A possible reason for this is that contamination fear may be characterised by variability in attention bias that has not yet been examined. The current study examined the potential association between attention bias variability for both contamination-related and mitigation-related stimuli, and contamination fear during the early stages of the COVID-19 pandemic. A final sample of 315 participants completed measures of attention bias and contamination fear. The measure of average attention bias for contamination-related stimuli and mitigation-related stimuli was not associated with contamination fear (r = 0.055 and r = 0.051, p > 0.10), though both attention bias variability measures did show a small but statistically significant relationship with contamination fear (r = 0.133, p < 0.05; r = 0.147, p < 0.01). These attention bias variability measures also accounted for significant additional variance in contamination fear above the average attention bias measure (and controlling for response time variability). These findings provide initial evidence for the association between attention bias variability and contamination fear, underscoring a potential target for cognitive bias interventions for clinical contamination fear.

COVID-19 大流行早期的污染恐惧和注意偏差变异性
COVID-19 大流行的爆发导致与感染风险和可降低这种风险的因素有关的信息的显著性和重要性急剧增加。这很可能是造成普通民众对污染恐惧担忧加剧的原因之一。有人提出,对污染相关信息的偏向性注意是造成污染恐惧的潜在机制,但有关这种偏向性注意存在的证据并不一致。其中一个可能的原因是,污染恐惧的特点可能是注意偏差的可变性,而这种可变性尚未得到研究。本研究探讨了在 COVID-19 大流行的早期阶段,污染相关刺激和缓解相关刺激的注意偏差变异性与污染恐惧之间的潜在关联。最终有 315 名参与者完成了注意力偏差和污染恐惧的测量。对污染相关刺激和缓解相关刺激的平均注意偏差测量与污染恐惧无关(r = 0.055 和 r = 0.051,p >0.10),尽管两种注意偏差变异性测量与污染恐惧有微小但有统计学意义的关系(r = 0.133,p <0.05;r = 0.147,p <0.01)。这些注意偏差变异性测量结果还能在平均注意偏差测量结果(并控制反应时间变异性)之上解释污染恐惧的其他重大变异。这些发现为注意偏差变异性与污染恐惧之间的联系提供了初步证据,强调了认知偏差干预治疗临床污染恐惧的潜在目标。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Behaviour Research and Therapy
Behaviour Research and Therapy PSYCHOLOGY, CLINICAL-
CiteScore
7.50
自引率
7.30%
发文量
148
期刊介绍: The major focus of Behaviour Research and Therapy is an experimental psychopathology approach to understanding emotional and behavioral disorders and their prevention and treatment, using cognitive, behavioral, and psychophysiological (including neural) methods and models. This includes laboratory-based experimental studies with healthy, at risk and subclinical individuals that inform clinical application as well as studies with clinically severe samples. The following types of submissions are encouraged: theoretical reviews of mechanisms that contribute to psychopathology and that offer new treatment targets; tests of novel, mechanistically focused psychological interventions, especially ones that include theory-driven or experimentally-derived predictors, moderators and mediators; and innovations in dissemination and implementation of evidence-based practices into clinical practice in psychology and associated fields, especially those that target underlying mechanisms or focus on novel approaches to treatment delivery. In addition to traditional psychological disorders, the scope of the journal includes behavioural medicine (e.g., chronic pain). The journal will not consider manuscripts dealing primarily with measurement, psychometric analyses, and personality assessment.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信