The use of biomimetic surfaces to reduce single- and dual-species biofilms of Escherichia coli and Pseudomonas putida

IF 5.9 Q1 MICROBIOLOGY
Rita Teixeira-Santos , Ana Azevedo , Maria J. Romeu , Cristina I. Amador , Luciana C. Gomes , Kathryn A. Whitehead , Jelmer Sjollema , Mette Burmølle , Filipe J. Mergulhão
{"title":"The use of biomimetic surfaces to reduce single- and dual-species biofilms of Escherichia coli and Pseudomonas putida","authors":"Rita Teixeira-Santos ,&nbsp;Ana Azevedo ,&nbsp;Maria J. Romeu ,&nbsp;Cristina I. Amador ,&nbsp;Luciana C. Gomes ,&nbsp;Kathryn A. Whitehead ,&nbsp;Jelmer Sjollema ,&nbsp;Mette Burmølle ,&nbsp;Filipe J. Mergulhão","doi":"10.1016/j.bioflm.2024.100185","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><p>The ability of bacteria to adhere to and form biofilms on food contact surfaces poses serious challenges, as these may lead to the cross-contamination of food products. Biomimetic topographic surface modifications have been explored to enhance the antifouling performance of materials. In this study, the topography of two plant leaves, <em>Brassica oleracea</em> var. <em>botrytis</em> (cauliflower, CF) and <em>Brassica oleracea capitate</em> (white cabbage, WC), was replicated through wax moulding, and their antibiofilm potential was tested against single- and dual-species biofilms of <em>Escherichia coli</em> and <em>Pseudomonas putida</em>. Biomimetic surfaces exhibited higher roughness values (<em>S</em><sub><em>a</em></sub> <sub>WC</sub> = 4.0 ± 1.0 μm and <em>S</em><sub><em>a</em></sub> <sub>CF</sub> = 3.3 ± 1.0 μm) than the flat control (<em>S</em><sub><em>a</em></sub> <sub>F</sub> = 0.6 ± 0.2 μm), whilst the CF surface demonstrated a lower interfacial free energy (<em>ΔG</em><sub><em>iwi</em></sub>) than the WC surface (−100.08 mJ m<sup>−2</sup> and −71.98 mJ m<sup>−2</sup>, respectively). The CF and WC surfaces had similar antibiofilm effects against single-species biofilms, achieving cell reductions of approximately 50% and 60% for <em>E. coli</em> and <em>P. putida</em>, respectively, compared to the control. Additionally, the biomimetic surfaces led to reductions of up to 60% in biovolume, 45% in thickness, and 60% in the surface coverage of single-species biofilms. For dual-species biofilms, only the <em>E. coli</em> strain growing on the WC surface exhibited a significant decrease in the cell count. However, confocal microscopy analysis revealed a 60% reduction in the total biovolume and surface coverage of mixed biofilms developed on both biomimetic surfaces. Furthermore, dual-species biofilms were mainly composed of <em>P. putida</em>, which reduced <em>E. coli</em> growth. Altogether, these results demonstrate that the surface properties of CF and WC biomimetic surfaces have the potential for reducing biofilm formation.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":55844,"journal":{"name":"Biofilm","volume":"7 ","pages":"Article 100185"},"PeriodicalIF":5.9000,"publicationDate":"2024-02-21","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2590207524000108/pdfft?md5=23e4ee41bb43669ceb9cc195da841e72&pid=1-s2.0-S2590207524000108-main.pdf","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Biofilm","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2590207524000108","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"MICROBIOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

The ability of bacteria to adhere to and form biofilms on food contact surfaces poses serious challenges, as these may lead to the cross-contamination of food products. Biomimetic topographic surface modifications have been explored to enhance the antifouling performance of materials. In this study, the topography of two plant leaves, Brassica oleracea var. botrytis (cauliflower, CF) and Brassica oleracea capitate (white cabbage, WC), was replicated through wax moulding, and their antibiofilm potential was tested against single- and dual-species biofilms of Escherichia coli and Pseudomonas putida. Biomimetic surfaces exhibited higher roughness values (Sa WC = 4.0 ± 1.0 μm and Sa CF = 3.3 ± 1.0 μm) than the flat control (Sa F = 0.6 ± 0.2 μm), whilst the CF surface demonstrated a lower interfacial free energy (ΔGiwi) than the WC surface (−100.08 mJ m−2 and −71.98 mJ m−2, respectively). The CF and WC surfaces had similar antibiofilm effects against single-species biofilms, achieving cell reductions of approximately 50% and 60% for E. coli and P. putida, respectively, compared to the control. Additionally, the biomimetic surfaces led to reductions of up to 60% in biovolume, 45% in thickness, and 60% in the surface coverage of single-species biofilms. For dual-species biofilms, only the E. coli strain growing on the WC surface exhibited a significant decrease in the cell count. However, confocal microscopy analysis revealed a 60% reduction in the total biovolume and surface coverage of mixed biofilms developed on both biomimetic surfaces. Furthermore, dual-species biofilms were mainly composed of P. putida, which reduced E. coli growth. Altogether, these results demonstrate that the surface properties of CF and WC biomimetic surfaces have the potential for reducing biofilm formation.

利用仿生表面减少大肠杆菌和绿脓杆菌的单种和双种生物膜
细菌能够附着在食品接触表面并形成生物膜,这带来了严峻的挑战,因为这可能导致食品的交叉污染。为了提高材料的防污性能,人们探索了仿生地形表面改性技术。在这项研究中,通过蜡模复制了两种植物叶片的地形,即 Brassica oleracea var.仿生表面的粗糙度值(Sa WC = 4.0 ± 1.0 μm,Sa CF = 3.3 ± 1.0 μm)高于平面对照(Sa F = 0.6 ± 0.2 μm),而 CF 表面的界面自由能(ΔGiwi)低于 WC 表面(分别为 -100.08 mJ m-2 和 -71.98 mJ m-2)。与对照组相比,CF 和 WC 表面对单种生物膜的抗生物膜效果相似,对大肠杆菌和绿脓杆菌的抗生物膜效果分别达到约 50% 和 60%。此外,仿生表面还能使单种生物膜的生物体积减少 60%,厚度减少 45%,表面覆盖率减少 60%。对于双菌种生物膜,只有生长在 WC 表面的大肠杆菌菌株的细胞数显著减少。不过,共聚焦显微镜分析表明,在两种仿生表面上形成的混合生物膜的总生物体积和表面覆盖率都减少了 60%。此外,双物种生物膜主要由 P. putida 组成,这减少了大肠杆菌的生长。总之,这些结果表明,CF 和 WC 仿生物表面的表面特性具有减少生物膜形成的潜力。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Biofilm
Biofilm MICROBIOLOGY-
CiteScore
7.50
自引率
1.50%
发文量
30
审稿时长
57 days
期刊介绍:
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信