Yang Han, Jie Zhu, Xiqian Zhang, Suning Hu, Cong Li
{"title":"Er:YAG Laser Therapy on Alveolar Osteitis After Mandibular Third Molar Surgery: A Randomized Controlled Clinical Study.","authors":"Yang Han, Jie Zhu, Xiqian Zhang, Suning Hu, Cong Li","doi":"10.1089/photob.2023.0151","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p><b><i>Background:</i></b> Alveolar osteitis (AO) or \"dry socket\" affects the quality of life of patients, and there is a high clinical demand for its effective treatment. <b><i>Objective:</i></b> To evaluate the effect of Er:YAG laser therapy (ErLT) on AO after mandibular third molar surgery. <b><i>Methods:</i></b> Eighty-three patients were randomly divided into Er (<i>n</i> = 43) and control groups (<i>n</i> = 40). In the Er group, the Er:YAG laser (2940 nm; AT Fidelis Fotona, Ljubljana, Slovenia) was used to irradiate the AO site directly in micro short-pulsed mode (pulse duration 0.1 ms, pulse energy 100 mJ, frequency 40 Hz, water 4, and air 2) until all debris and necrotic material had been removed, exposing fresh bone and soft tissue surfaces with blood exudation. The control group received mechanical therapy until the treated lesions resembled those in the Er group. Pain assessment was performed at baseline and on days 1-7 post-intervention using the visual analog scale (VAS). Wound healing was assessed using the wound healing index (WHI). The operating times of the two therapies were also recorded. <b><i>Results:</i></b> Group Er had lower VAS scores than the control group on days 1-3 (<i>p</i> = 0.00). There was no significant difference between the two groups on days 4-7 (<i>p</i> = 0.15). The WHI scores were better in the Er group than those in the control group (<i>t</i> = 2.65, <i>p</i> = 0.01), especially in terms of redness (<i>t</i> = 2.70, <i>p</i> = 0.01). There was no significant difference in the operating time between the two groups (<i>t</i> = 0.76, <i>p</i> = 0.45). <b><i>Conclusions:</i></b> Compared with mechanical therapy, ErLT for AO provides rapid pain relief and improved wound healing.</p>","PeriodicalId":94169,"journal":{"name":"Photobiomodulation, photomedicine, and laser surgery","volume":" ","pages":"238-245"},"PeriodicalIF":1.8000,"publicationDate":"2024-03-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Photobiomodulation, photomedicine, and laser surgery","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1089/photob.2023.0151","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2024/2/28 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"SURGERY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Background: Alveolar osteitis (AO) or "dry socket" affects the quality of life of patients, and there is a high clinical demand for its effective treatment. Objective: To evaluate the effect of Er:YAG laser therapy (ErLT) on AO after mandibular third molar surgery. Methods: Eighty-three patients were randomly divided into Er (n = 43) and control groups (n = 40). In the Er group, the Er:YAG laser (2940 nm; AT Fidelis Fotona, Ljubljana, Slovenia) was used to irradiate the AO site directly in micro short-pulsed mode (pulse duration 0.1 ms, pulse energy 100 mJ, frequency 40 Hz, water 4, and air 2) until all debris and necrotic material had been removed, exposing fresh bone and soft tissue surfaces with blood exudation. The control group received mechanical therapy until the treated lesions resembled those in the Er group. Pain assessment was performed at baseline and on days 1-7 post-intervention using the visual analog scale (VAS). Wound healing was assessed using the wound healing index (WHI). The operating times of the two therapies were also recorded. Results: Group Er had lower VAS scores than the control group on days 1-3 (p = 0.00). There was no significant difference between the two groups on days 4-7 (p = 0.15). The WHI scores were better in the Er group than those in the control group (t = 2.65, p = 0.01), especially in terms of redness (t = 2.70, p = 0.01). There was no significant difference in the operating time between the two groups (t = 0.76, p = 0.45). Conclusions: Compared with mechanical therapy, ErLT for AO provides rapid pain relief and improved wound healing.