Individualized Functional Brain System Topologies and Major Depression: Relationships Among Patch Sizes and Clinical Profiles and Behavior

IF 5.7 2区 医学 Q1 NEUROSCIENCES
Matthew D. Sacchet , Poorvi Keshava , Shane W. Walsh , Ruby M. Potash , Meiling Li , Hesheng Liu , Diego A. Pizzagalli
{"title":"Individualized Functional Brain System Topologies and Major Depression: Relationships Among Patch Sizes and Clinical Profiles and Behavior","authors":"Matthew D. Sacchet ,&nbsp;Poorvi Keshava ,&nbsp;Shane W. Walsh ,&nbsp;Ruby M. Potash ,&nbsp;Meiling Li ,&nbsp;Hesheng Liu ,&nbsp;Diego A. Pizzagalli","doi":"10.1016/j.bpsc.2024.02.011","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Background</h3><p>Neuroimaging studies of major depression have typically been conducted using group-level approaches. However, given interindividual differences in brain systems, there is a need for individualized approaches to brain systems mapping and putative links toward diagnosis, symptoms, and behavior.</p></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><p>We used an iterative parcellation approach to map individualized brain systems in 328 participants from a multisite, placebo-controlled clinical trial. We hypothesized that participants with depression would show abnormalities in salience, control, default, and affective systems, which would be associated with higher levels of self-reported anhedonia, anxious arousal, and worse cognitive performance. Within hypothesized brain systems, we compared patch sizes (number of vertices) between depressed and healthy control groups. Within depressed groups, abnormal patches were correlated with hypothesized clinical and behavioral measures.</p></div><div><h3>Results</h3><p>Significant group differences emerged in hypothesized patches of 1) the lateral salience system (parietal operculum; <em>t</em><sub>326</sub> = −3.11, <em>p</em> = .002) and 2) the control system (left medial posterior prefrontal cortex region; <em>z</em> = −3.63, <em>p</em> &lt; .001), with significantly smaller patches in these regions in participants with depression than in healthy control participants. Results suggest that participants with depression with significantly smaller patch sizes in the lateral salience system and control system regions experience greater anxious arousal and cognitive deficits.</p></div><div><h3>Conclusions</h3><p>The findings imply that neural features mapped at the individual level may relate meaningfully to diagnosis, symptoms, and behavior. There is strong clinical relevance in taking an individualized brain systems approach to mapping neural functional connectivity because these associated region patch sizes may help advance our understanding of neural features linked to psychopathology and foster future patient-specific clinical decision making.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":54231,"journal":{"name":"Biological Psychiatry-Cognitive Neuroscience and Neuroimaging","volume":"9 6","pages":"Pages 616-625"},"PeriodicalIF":5.7000,"publicationDate":"2024-06-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Biological Psychiatry-Cognitive Neuroscience and Neuroimaging","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2451902224000624","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"NEUROSCIENCES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background

Neuroimaging studies of major depression have typically been conducted using group-level approaches. However, given interindividual differences in brain systems, there is a need for individualized approaches to brain systems mapping and putative links toward diagnosis, symptoms, and behavior.

Methods

We used an iterative parcellation approach to map individualized brain systems in 328 participants from a multisite, placebo-controlled clinical trial. We hypothesized that participants with depression would show abnormalities in salience, control, default, and affective systems, which would be associated with higher levels of self-reported anhedonia, anxious arousal, and worse cognitive performance. Within hypothesized brain systems, we compared patch sizes (number of vertices) between depressed and healthy control groups. Within depressed groups, abnormal patches were correlated with hypothesized clinical and behavioral measures.

Results

Significant group differences emerged in hypothesized patches of 1) the lateral salience system (parietal operculum; t326 = −3.11, p = .002) and 2) the control system (left medial posterior prefrontal cortex region; z = −3.63, p < .001), with significantly smaller patches in these regions in participants with depression than in healthy control participants. Results suggest that participants with depression with significantly smaller patch sizes in the lateral salience system and control system regions experience greater anxious arousal and cognitive deficits.

Conclusions

The findings imply that neural features mapped at the individual level may relate meaningfully to diagnosis, symptoms, and behavior. There is strong clinical relevance in taking an individualized brain systems approach to mapping neural functional connectivity because these associated region patch sizes may help advance our understanding of neural features linked to psychopathology and foster future patient-specific clinical decision making.

个性化大脑功能系统拓扑与重度抑郁症:斑块大小与临床特征和行为之间的关系。
背景:重度抑郁症的神经影像学研究通常采用群体方法。然而,考虑到大脑系统的个体差异,需要采用个体化方法绘制大脑系统图,并将其与诊断、症状和行为联系起来:方法:我们使用迭代解析法绘制了一项多地点安慰剂对照临床试验中 328 名参与者的个性化大脑系统图。我们假设,抑郁症患者会在显著性、控制、默认和情感系统中表现出异常,而这些异常将与自我报告的更高程度的失乐症、焦虑唤醒和更差的认知表现有关。在假设的大脑系统中,我们比较了抑郁组和健康对照组的斑块大小(顶点数量)。在抑郁组中,异常斑块与假设的临床和行为测量结果相关 结果:在以下假设的斑块中出现了显著的组间差异:(a) 外侧突出系统(顶叶厣;t=-3.11,p=0.002)和(b) 控制系统(左内侧后前额叶皮层区域;z=-3.63,p=0.002)。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
10.40
自引率
1.70%
发文量
247
审稿时长
30 days
期刊介绍: Biological Psychiatry: Cognitive Neuroscience and Neuroimaging is an official journal of the Society for Biological Psychiatry, whose purpose is to promote excellence in scientific research and education in fields that investigate the nature, causes, mechanisms, and treatments of disorders of thought, emotion, or behavior. In accord with this mission, this peer-reviewed, rapid-publication, international journal focuses on studies using the tools and constructs of cognitive neuroscience, including the full range of non-invasive neuroimaging and human extra- and intracranial physiological recording methodologies. It publishes both basic and clinical studies, including those that incorporate genetic data, pharmacological challenges, and computational modeling approaches. The journal publishes novel results of original research which represent an important new lead or significant impact on the field. Reviews and commentaries that focus on topics of current research and interest are also encouraged.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信