A qualitative study on the facilitators and barriers to adopting the N-of-1 trial methodology as part of clinical practice: potential versus implementation challenges.

IF 2.1 4区 医学 Q2 NURSING
Ilona Wilmont, Mark Loeffen, Thomas Hoogeboom
{"title":"A qualitative study on the facilitators and barriers to adopting the N-of-1 trial methodology as part of clinical practice: potential versus implementation challenges.","authors":"Ilona Wilmont, Mark Loeffen, Thomas Hoogeboom","doi":"10.1080/17482631.2024.2318810","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Purpose: </strong>To investigate opinions among healthcare stakeholders whether implementation of the N-of-1 trial approach in clinical practice is a feasible way to optimize evidence-based treatment results for unique patients.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>We interviewed clinicians, researchers, and a patient advocate (<i>n</i> = 13) with an interest in or experience with N-of-1 trials on the following topics: experience with N-of-1, measurement, validity and reliability, informally gathered data usability, and influence on physician-patient relationship. Interviews were analysed using qualitative, thematic analysis.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The N-of-1 approach has the potential to shift the current healthcare system towards embracing personalized medicine. However, its application in clinical practice carries significant challenges in terms of logistics, time investment and acceptability. New skills will be required from patients and healthcare providers, which may alter the patient-physician relationship. The rise of consumer technology enabling self-measurement may leverage the uptake of N-of-1 approaches in clinical practice.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>There is a strong belief that the N-of-1 approach has the potential to play a prominent role in transitioning the current healthcare system towards embracing personalized medicine. However, there are many barriers deeply ingrained in our healthcare system that hamper the uptake of the N-of-1 approach, making it momentarily only interesting for research purposes.</p>","PeriodicalId":51468,"journal":{"name":"International Journal of Qualitative Studies on Health and Well-Being","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":2.1000,"publicationDate":"2024-12-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10903748/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"International Journal of Qualitative Studies on Health and Well-Being","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/17482631.2024.2318810","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2024/2/28 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"NURSING","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Purpose: To investigate opinions among healthcare stakeholders whether implementation of the N-of-1 trial approach in clinical practice is a feasible way to optimize evidence-based treatment results for unique patients.

Methods: We interviewed clinicians, researchers, and a patient advocate (n = 13) with an interest in or experience with N-of-1 trials on the following topics: experience with N-of-1, measurement, validity and reliability, informally gathered data usability, and influence on physician-patient relationship. Interviews were analysed using qualitative, thematic analysis.

Results: The N-of-1 approach has the potential to shift the current healthcare system towards embracing personalized medicine. However, its application in clinical practice carries significant challenges in terms of logistics, time investment and acceptability. New skills will be required from patients and healthcare providers, which may alter the patient-physician relationship. The rise of consumer technology enabling self-measurement may leverage the uptake of N-of-1 approaches in clinical practice.

Conclusions: There is a strong belief that the N-of-1 approach has the potential to play a prominent role in transitioning the current healthcare system towards embracing personalized medicine. However, there are many barriers deeply ingrained in our healthcare system that hamper the uptake of the N-of-1 approach, making it momentarily only interesting for research purposes.

关于将 N-of-1 试验方法作为临床实践一部分的促进因素和障碍的定性研究:潜力与实施挑战。
目的:调查医疗利益相关者对在临床实践中实施 N-of-1 试验方法是否是为特殊患者优化循证治疗结果的可行方法的看法:我们就以下主题采访了对 N-of-1 试验感兴趣或有相关经验的临床医生、研究人员和一名患者权益倡导者(n = 13):N-of-1 试验经验、测量、有效性和可靠性、非正式收集数据的可用性以及对医患关系的影响。访谈采用定性主题分析法进行分析:N-of-1方法有可能使当前的医疗保健系统转向接受个性化医疗。然而,将其应用于临床实践在物流、时间投入和可接受性方面都面临着巨大挑战。病人和医疗服务提供者需要掌握新的技能,这可能会改变病人与医生之间的关系。能够进行自我测量的消费技术的兴起可能会促进 N-of-1 方法在临床实践中的应用:人们坚信,N-of-1 方法有可能在当前医疗保健系统向个性化医疗过渡的过程中发挥重要作用。然而,在我们的医疗保健系统中存在着许多根深蒂固的障碍,阻碍了N-of-1方法的应用,使其暂时只能用于研究目的。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
3.20
自引率
5.60%
发文量
99
审稿时长
14 weeks
期刊介绍: International Journal of Qualitative Studies on Health and Well-being acknowledges the international and interdisciplinary nature of health-related issues. It intends to provide a meeting-point for studies using rigorous qualitative methodology of significance for issues related to human health and well-being. The aim of the International Journal of Qualitative Studies on Health and Well-being is to support and to shape the emerging field of qualitative studies and to encourage a better understanding of all aspects of human health and well-being.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信