Psychometric properties and normative data of the Latvian and Russian language versions of the strengths and difficulties questionnaire (SDQ) in the Latvian general adolescent population.

IF 1.5 4区 医学 Q3 PSYCHIATRY
Nordic Journal of Psychiatry Pub Date : 2024-05-01 Epub Date: 2024-02-29 DOI:10.1080/08039488.2024.2319662
Ņikita Bezborodovs, Rūdolfs Krēgers, Lelde Vētra, Elmārs Rancāns, Anita Villeruša
{"title":"Psychometric properties and normative data of the Latvian and Russian language versions of the strengths and difficulties questionnaire (SDQ) in the Latvian general adolescent population.","authors":"Ņikita Bezborodovs, Rūdolfs Krēgers, Lelde Vētra, Elmārs Rancāns, Anita Villeruša","doi":"10.1080/08039488.2024.2319662","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objectives: </strong>Mental health screening instruments are essential in population health research and clinical practice. The strengths and difficulties questionnaire (SDQ) self-report version has been widely used across the globe to screen for mental health problems in adolescent populations. This study aimed to explore the psychometric properties of the Latvian and Russian language versions of the SDQ in a representative sample of a general population of Latvian adolescents and establish the population-based normative scores.</p><p><strong>Materials and methods: </strong>This analysis was based on data from the international Health Behaviour in School-aged Children study year 2017/2018 Latvian database. The sample comprised 2683 Latvian and 1321 Russian-speaking 11-, 13-, and 15-year-old adolescents.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Significant language-based variance was observed in the mean scores of the externalising subscales of the SDQ, with Latvian-speaking adolescents reporting higher levels of conduct problems and hyperactivity. The reliability was satisfactory (ordinal alpha >0.7) only for the prosocial behaviour, emotional, internalising problems, and total difficulties subscales, while conduct, hyperactivity, peer, and externalising problems scales demonstrated lower internal consistency (ordinal alpha 0.5-0.7). Confirmatory factor analysis (CFA) did not support the hypothesised narrow-band five-factor or broad-band three-factor structure of the SDQ. The normative banding scores were calculated for both language variants.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>This study suggests that the self-report SDQ must be used cautiously in Latvian adolescents because some SDQ subscales lack reliability. When used in population research, the internalising subscales seem more reliable than the externalising ones. More research is needed regarding the reliability of the SDQ in clinical adolescent populations.</p>","PeriodicalId":19201,"journal":{"name":"Nordic Journal of Psychiatry","volume":" ","pages":"301-311"},"PeriodicalIF":1.5000,"publicationDate":"2024-05-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Nordic Journal of Psychiatry","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/08039488.2024.2319662","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2024/2/29 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"PSYCHIATRY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Objectives: Mental health screening instruments are essential in population health research and clinical practice. The strengths and difficulties questionnaire (SDQ) self-report version has been widely used across the globe to screen for mental health problems in adolescent populations. This study aimed to explore the psychometric properties of the Latvian and Russian language versions of the SDQ in a representative sample of a general population of Latvian adolescents and establish the population-based normative scores.

Materials and methods: This analysis was based on data from the international Health Behaviour in School-aged Children study year 2017/2018 Latvian database. The sample comprised 2683 Latvian and 1321 Russian-speaking 11-, 13-, and 15-year-old adolescents.

Results: Significant language-based variance was observed in the mean scores of the externalising subscales of the SDQ, with Latvian-speaking adolescents reporting higher levels of conduct problems and hyperactivity. The reliability was satisfactory (ordinal alpha >0.7) only for the prosocial behaviour, emotional, internalising problems, and total difficulties subscales, while conduct, hyperactivity, peer, and externalising problems scales demonstrated lower internal consistency (ordinal alpha 0.5-0.7). Confirmatory factor analysis (CFA) did not support the hypothesised narrow-band five-factor or broad-band three-factor structure of the SDQ. The normative banding scores were calculated for both language variants.

Conclusions: This study suggests that the self-report SDQ must be used cautiously in Latvian adolescents because some SDQ subscales lack reliability. When used in population research, the internalising subscales seem more reliable than the externalising ones. More research is needed regarding the reliability of the SDQ in clinical adolescent populations.

拉脱维亚普通青少年人口中拉脱维亚语和俄语版本的优势与困难问卷 (SDQ) 的心理计量特性和标准数据。
目的:心理健康筛查工具在人群健康研究和临床实践中至关重要。优点和困难问卷(SDQ)自我报告版已在全球范围内被广泛用于筛查青少年群体中的心理健康问题。本研究旨在通过拉脱维亚青少年的代表性样本,探索拉脱维亚语和俄语版本 SDQ 的心理测量特性,并建立基于人群的标准分数:本分析基于国际学龄儿童健康行为研究 2017/2018 拉脱维亚数据库中的数据。样本包括 2683 名拉脱维亚语青少年和 1321 名讲俄语的 11、13 和 15 岁青少年:SDQ外化分量表的平均分存在显著的语言差异,拉脱维亚语青少年报告的行为问题和多动程度更高。只有亲社会行为、情绪、内化问题和总困难分量表的信度令人满意(序数α>0.7),而行为、多动、同伴和外化问题量表的内部一致性较低(序数α0.5-0.7)。确认性因素分析(CFA)不支持 SDQ 的窄带五因素或宽带三因素结构假设。两种语言变体的常模分段得分均已计算:本研究表明,在拉脱维亚青少年中必须谨慎使用自我报告 SDQ,因为某些 SDQ 子量表缺乏可靠性。在人口研究中使用时,内化分量表似乎比外化分量表更可靠。关于SDQ在临床青少年群体中的可靠性,还需要进行更多的研究。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Nordic Journal of Psychiatry
Nordic Journal of Psychiatry 医学-精神病学
CiteScore
3.60
自引率
5.60%
发文量
86
审稿时长
12 months
期刊介绍: Nordic Journal of Psychiatry publishes international research on all areas of psychiatry. Nordic Journal of Psychiatry is the official journal for the eight psychiatry associations in the Nordic and Baltic countries. The journal aims to provide a leading international forum for high quality research on all themes of psychiatry including: Child psychiatry Adult psychiatry Psychotherapy Pharmacotherapy Social psychiatry Psychosomatic medicine Nordic Journal of Psychiatry accepts original research articles, review articles, brief reports, editorials and letters to the editor.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信